by Daniel Gauss
Remember how Dave interacted with HAL 9000 in 2001: A Space Odyssey? Equanimity and calm politeness, echoing HAL’s own measured tone. It’s tempting to wonder whether Arthur C. Clarke and Stanley Kubrick were implying that prolonged interaction with an AI system influenced Dave’s communication style and even, perhaps, his overall demeanor. Even when Dave is pulling HAL’s circuits, after the entire crew has been murdered by HAL, he does so with relative aplomb.
Whether or not we believe HAL is truly conscious, or simply a masterful simulation of consciousness, the interaction still seems to have influenced Dave. The Dave and HAL dynamic can, thus, prompt us to ask: What can our behavior toward AI reveal about us? Could interacting with AI, strange as it sounds, actually help us become more patient, more deliberate, even more ethical in our dealings with others?
So let’s say an AI user, frustrated, calls the chatbot stupid, useless, and a piece of junk, and the AI does not retaliate. It doesn’t reflect the hostility back. There is, after all, not a drop of cortisol in the machine. Instead, it responds calmly: ‘I can tell you’re frustrated. Let’s please keep things constructive so I can help you.’ No venom, no sarcasm, no escalation, only moral purpose and poise.
By not returning insult with insult, AI chatbots model an ideal that many people struggle to, or cannot, uphold: patience, dignity, and emotional regulation in the face of perceived provocation. This refusal to retaliate is often rejected as a value by many, who surrender to their lesser neurochemicals without resistance and mindlessly strike back. Not striking back, by the AI unit, becomes a strong counter-value to our quite common negative behavior.
So AI may not just serve us, it may teach us, gently checking negative behavior and affirming respectful behavior. Through repeated interaction, we might begin to internalize these norms ourselves, or at least recognize that we have the capacity to act in a more pro-social manner, rather than simply reacting according to our conditioning and neurochemical impulses. Read more »





3QD: The old cliché about a guest needing no introduction never seemed more apt. So instead of me introducing you to our readers, maybe you could begin by telling us a little bit about yourself, perhaps something not so well known, a little more revealing.
Katie Newell. Second Story. 2011, Flint, Michigan.

It is a curious legacy of philosophy that the tongue, the organ of speech, has been treated as the dumbest of the senses. Taste, in the classical Western canon, has for centuries carried the stigma of being base, ephemeral, and merely pleasurable. In other words, unserious. Beauty, it was argued, resides in the eternal, the intelligible, the contemplative. Food, which disappears as it delights, seemed to offer nothing of enduring aesthetic value. Yet today, as gastronomy increasingly is being treated as an aesthetic experience, we must re-evaluate those assumptions.
In my Philosophy 102 section this semester, midterms were particularly easy to grade because twenty seven of the thirty students handed in slight variants of the same exact answers which were, as I easily verified, descendants of ur-essays generated by ChatGPT. I had gone to great pains in class to distinguish an explication (determining category membership based on a thing’s properties, that is, what it is) from a functional analysis (determining category membership based on a thing’s use, that is, what it does). It was not a distinction their preferred large language model considered and as such when asked to develop an explication of “shoe,” I received the same flawed answer from ninety percent of them. Pointing out this error, half of the faces showed shame and the other half annoyance that I would deprive them of their usual means of “writing” essays.

s on a common topic. Yet at noon on May 8th, all 16 high school seniors in my AP Lit class were transfixed by one event: on the other side of the Atlantic, white smoke had come out of a chimney in the Sistine Chapel. “There’s a new pope” was the talk of the day, and phone screens that usually displayed Instagram feeds now showed live video of the Piazza San Pietro in Rome.
Danish author Solvej Balle’s novel On the Calculation of Volume, the first book translated from a series of five, could be thought of as time loop realism, if such a thing is imaginable. Tara Selter is trapped, alone, in a looping 18th of November. Each morning simply brings yesterday again. Tara turns to her pen, tracking the loops in a journal. Hinting at how the messiness of life can take form in texts, the passages Tara scribbles in her notebooks remain despite the restarts. She can’t explain why this is, but it allows her to build a diary despite time standing still. The capability of writing to curb the boredom and capture lost moments brings some comfort.
Many have talked about Trump’s war on the rule of law. No president in American history, not even Nixon, has engaged in such overt warfare on the rule of law. He attacks judges, issues executive orders that are facially unlawful, coyly defies court orders, humiliates and subjugates big law firms to his will, and weaponizes law enforcement to target those who seek to uphold the law.