by Daniel Gauss

If the United States reinstated the military draft, many defense experts and policy analysts argue that this would weaken the all-volunteer force by lowering personnel quality, hurting morale and negatively affecting retention. Yet, the administration of Donald Trump is moving to automate draft registration under Pete Hegseth, streamlining a system the military itself would prefer not to use.
Why modernize a program widely seen as unnecessary, or even potentially harmful? To answer that, we need to look at how draft registration was quickly reborn (1980) after the draft ended (1973) and registration was suspended (1975), and why registration has not been abandoned, even though it should have been.
President Jimmy Carter proposed reinstating military draft registration in the late 1970s, after it had been suspended just a few years earlier. Only someone oblivious to the lessons of Vietnam could have ignored the well-documented problems with the draft (lower morale, discipline issues and personnel quality) that severely plagued the military for years.
Post‑Vietnam, Army leaders, most prominently Gen. Creighton Abrams, became champions of an all‑volunteer force. Abrams believed draftees undermined discipline and unit cohesion, so he redesigned the Army around high-quality volunteers, proving the draft was neither necessary nor desirable long-term and establishing a model that the other services ultimately adopted.
Carter reinstated registration for the military draft anyway, apparently for self-serving political reasons…pure political theater to prop up a failing presidential run. Since then, maintaining the Selective Service has cost taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars, money spent to keep a draft machine ready that an all-volunteer force has made obsolete. Read more »





On Thursday this week I will join two of my colleagues—the mezzo Annina Haug and the pianist Edward Rushton—to present a program of poems by French authors to a private audience. We are staging our concert in Zurich, at the home of a descendant of one of those authors, the renowned Swiss-French clown and musician 





I’m curious about the intersection of psychology, philosophy, and spirituality, and the more I read, the more closely they all appear to intertwine until they’re sometimes indistinguishable. Buddhism overlaps with Stoicism, which influenced Albert Ellis’s REBT (then CBT and all its variations). They dig down to acknowledge and question mistaken core beliefs. Plato inspired some of Freud’s work, which mixed with Sartre and Camus to become the existential psychotherapy of Irvin Yalom and Otto Rank. They have a focus on the acceptance of death, which comes back around to the Buddhist prescription to meditate on our bones turning to dust. Yet, despite a general theme being repeated, it’s striking how hard it is to get out from the minutia of daily life to attend to it.
Sughra Raza. Microforest, March 2022.

The debate about whether artificial intelligence might one day become conscious is philosophically interesting. It raises age-old philosophical questions in a new form: What is a mind? What counts as experience? What would it mean for something made of code and silicon to have beliefs, desires, or a point of view? I covered some of those issues in a