Lockdown Drill

As we practice being silent and invisible, a sophomore says,
Would you take a bullet for me, Mrs. Garcia?
……..
In this corner of darkened classroom, teens under furniture,
his inquiry sparks murmurs. Crouching in my dress,
……..
I give him a look that says, You are an insufferable wiseass.
While we wait, in my mind, I try to recite Psalm 23 by heart.
……..
Would you take a bullet for me, Mrs. Garcia? I don’t yet know
that after more drills, future shootings, I soften and see
maybe the boy was scared and deflected fear the best he could.
……..
Though restless, we remain huddled away from the windows.
Fifteen miles down the road is Sandy Hook Elementary.
……..
Over the P.A., the Incident Coordinator gives the all-clear,
delivering us from make-believe that isn’t. I shepherd
……..
students back to Shakespeare, semicolons. Sitting
at their desks, they fill each row, my little ducks.

—–
by Nicole Caruso Garcia

from Rattle Magazine

““A designer launched a line of school shooting sweatshirts, complete with bullet holes. Like many people, I was repulsed. Also this week, Sandy Hook Promise launched a timely PSA called ‘Back to School Essentials.’ As an educator who taught for 15 years in the public school system, this week’s news made me meditate on my own experiences of school lockdown drills that have become necessary, how I have seen them affect me, my colleagues, and our students.”

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Wednesday, October 29, 2025

The Case for Strip Malls, the Antidote to Shiny, Soulless City Luxury

Ismail Muhammad in the New York Times:

We’ve moved beyond what the magazine n+1 identified as the unadorned qualities of post-2008 cityscapes. That insubstantial, flat and gray “fast-casual modernism” is complemented by a social-media-approved cookie-cutter skin that has been thrust upon our major and midsize cities in a dismal consensus. It’s no surprise that New York is getting its very own versions of two neo-yuppie Los Angeles mainstays: the meme-ified health-food store Erewhon and the Los Feliz cafe Maru (which I love, of course). America’s two largest cities have most quickly been reshaped by the internet, succumbing to an epidemic of increasingly blank streets for the moneyed classes, the bicoastal and the terminally online people who covet luxury. It’s possible now to walk down Columbus Avenue and mistake it for Abbot Kinney in Venice Beach.

As a solution, I present a hated staple of American urban infrastructure: the strip mall.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Cognitivism prevents us from understanding artificial intelligence

Paper by Mehdi Bugallo:

Cognitivism, which has permeated society—as evidenced by the omnipresence of the terms “cognitive” and “cognition”—has perpetuated a traditional view of thought and intelligence as phenomena of inextricable complexity, and therefore phenomena that we can hardly imagine recreating artificially. This approach has prevented us from anticipating and continues to prevent us from understanding what is happening. Behaviorism, on the other hand, allows us to apprehend complexity through the simple processes from which it emerges and provides the framework for understanding current AI. According to this approach, here is what is essential to understand about psychology: the environment shapes the behavior of organisms via two processes, natural selection and associative learning; the first process structures the brain over generations, establishing a “pre-wiring” that provides the basis upon which the second process structures behaviors over the course of the individual’s life.

The idea of artificial neural networks functioning on associative principles is fundamentally simple, and it is not new (Geoffrey Hinton had been working on this idea for decades when he received the Nobel Prize in 2024). But for such a system to yield results, it needed to be able to integrate billions of parameters, something that was only possible with current graphics cards (GPUs); hence the sudden improvement in AI.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Bill Gates: Three tough truths about climate

Bill Gates at Gates Notes:

Although climate change will have serious consequences—particularly for people in the poorest countries—it will not lead to humanity’s demise. People will be able to live and thrive in most places on Earth for the foreseeable future. Emissions projections have gone down, and with the right policies and investments, innovation will allow us to drive emissions down much further.

Unfortunately, the doomsday outlook is causing much of the climate community to focus too much on near-term emissions goals, and it’s diverting resources from the most effective things we should be doing to improve life in a warming world.

It’s not too late to adopt a different view and adjust our strategies for dealing with climate change. Next month’s global climate summit in Brazil, known as COP30, is an excellent place to begin, especially because the summit’s Brazilian leadership is putting climate adaptation and human development high on the agenda.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

7 basic science discoveries that changed the world

Michael Marshall in Nature:

From hot springs to DNA forensics

In the summer of 1966, while he was an undergraduate at Indiana University, Hudson Freeze went to live in a cabin on the edge of Yellowstone National Park. He was working for microbiologist Thomas Brock, who was convinced that certain microorganisms were living at surprisingly high temperatures. Dodging bears, and the traffic jams they caused, Freeze visited the hot springs every day to sample their bacteria. On 19 September, Freeze succeeded in growing a sample of yellowish microbes from Mushroom Spring. Under a microscope, he found an array of cells collected from the near-boiling fluids. “I was seeing something that nobody had ever seen before,” says Freeze, now at the Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute in La Jolla, California. “I still get goosebumps when I remember looking into the microscope.”

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Wednesday Poem

The Weight of Sweetness

No easy thing to bear, the weight of sweetness.
Song, wisdom, sadness, joy: sweetness
equals three of any of these gravities.

See a peach bend
the branch and strain the stem until
it snaps.
Hold the peach, try the weight, sweetness
and death so round and snug
in your palm.
And, so, there is
the weight of memory:

Windblown, a rain-soaked
bough shakes, showering
the man and the boy.
They shiver in delight,
and the father lifts from his son’s cheek
one green leaf
fallen like a kiss.

The good boy hugs a bag of peaches
his father has entrusted to him.
Now he follows his father
who carries a bagful in each arm.
See the look on the boy’s face
as his father moves
faster, farther ahead, while his own steps
flag, his arms grow weak as he labors
under the weight
of peaches.

Li-Young Lee 1957 –
From Rose (BOA Editions, 1986).

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Fiction as an Exercise in Sabotage

Xiaolu Guo at Words Without Borders:

A writer explores the semiotic. All artists work with signs and meanings. For me, writing is a form of semiotic sabotage. It is full of bold advances and strategic retreats, and above all it is shot through with deliberate acts of obstructionism.

But why sabotage? Why such a violent word, which resonates with political struggle and warfare?

For a storyteller who switches from one major language to another, semiotic sabotage is a means of disruption and reinvention. Often the method such an author adopts, be she a realist or a postmodernist, involves some degree of linguistic and ideological demolishing and reinventing. I am part of this phenomenon. Having left China for Britain, my writing has been a hybrid of Chinese and English linguistic forms. That’s how I imagine the possibilities of narrative.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Sean Carroll’s Mindscape Podcast: Gordon Pennycook on Unthinkingness, Conspiracies, and What to Do About Them

Sean Carroll at Preposterous Universe:

Why are people wrong all the time, anyway? Is it because we human beings are too good at being irrational, using our biases and motivated reasoning to convince ourselves of something that isn’t quite accurate? Or is it something different — unmotivated reasoning, or “unthinkingness,” an unwillingness to do the cognitive work that most of us are actually up to if we try? Gordon Pennycook wants to argue for the latter, and this simple shift has important consequences, including for strategies for getting people to be less susceptible to misinformation and conspiracies.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

The Villains on Pre-K TV Are Cuddly, Annoying and … Morally Interesting

Robin Kaiser-Schatzlein in the New York Times:

In most superhero stories, the villains are so deranged or evil that they operate outside the boundaries of society. “SuperKitties” and its ilk focus on characters who do bad things from within the boundaries of society: Their actions are hurtful or wrong, but they were committed because the character believed they were reasonable or permitted. Children may get more out of this type of character because this is exactly the kind of conflict they experience with parents, siblings and classmates; it is even a situation they may find themselves in, having done something that seemed fun or helpful only to receive a scolding, warning or lecture in response.

It should also be familiar to adults, who know that bad deeds can be driven by good intentions.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Plants have a secret language

Amber Dance in Nature:

When Robert Hooke gazed through his microscope at a slice of cork and coined the term ‘cell’ in 1665, he was really looking at just the walls of the dead cells. The squishy contents typically found within would become objects of ongoing study. But for many plant scientists, the walls themselves faded into the background. They were considered passive containers for the exciting biology inside.

“For a long time, the cell wall was really thought to be dead,” says Alice Cheung, a plant molecular biologist and biochemist at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. It wasn’t until the late twentieth century, Cheung says, that scientists began to reveal the cell wall for the vibrant, ever-changing structure it is. Even then, its complex mix of sugar molecules linked into long, branching polysaccharides kept away all but the most intrepid biochemists.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

How do you know what I know you know?

David Adam in Nature:

How do we know when others know what we know? Harvard psychologist Steven Pinker’s latest book, When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows, delves into how ‘common knowledge’ can cement or explode social relations. Common knowledge — awareness of mutual understanding — can explain the emergence of social-media shaming mobs, academic cancel culture and revolutions that seem to erupt from nowhere. It drives how people coordinate with others and can explain everything from awkward first-date conversations to financial bubbles and stock-market crashes. Pinker tells Nature why it helps to better understand the ways we get into each other’s heads — and what happens when we know that we have.

What is common knowledge?

It is the state in which I know something, you know it, I know that you know it, you know that I know it, I know that you know that I know that you know it, and so on, ad infinitum. It differs from private knowledge, in which someone knows something without knowing whether anyone knows they know it.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Experiences in Groups

Lily Scherlis at n+1:

Group relations was built for wartime, its experimental protocols germinating amid British imperial and military activity. During World War I, Bion had led tank squadrons, learning how groups behaved when enclosed in machines that might explode at any moment. In World War II, charged with selecting cadets to train as officers, Bion observed how individuals behaved in unstructured groups, inventing the prototype of the small study group. Working at British military psychiatric hospitals, he turned his method of passive observation into a treatment: refusing to actively facilitate his therapy groups, he waited quietly, unperturbed by his squirming patients. When they would complain that they weren’t receiving therapy, he would genially offer a hypothesis about how the group was behaving at that moment.

From his observations, Bion theorized that groups under pressure tend to regress to earlier developmental stages. Just as individuals regress into neurosis or psychosis, regressed groups unconsciously gravitate toward one of three counterproductive psychic states Bion called “basic assumptions.”

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Tuesday Poem

Eating Alone

I’ve pulled the last of the year’s young onions.
The garden is bare now. The ground is cold, 
brown and old. What is left of the day flames 
in the maples at the corner of my 
eye. I turn, a cardinal vanishes. 
By the cellar door, I wash the onions, 
then drink from the icy metal spigot.

Once, years back, I walked beside my father 
among the windfall pears. I can’t recall 
our words. We may have strolled in silence. But 
I still see him bend that way-left hand braced 
on knee, creaky-to lift and hold to my 
eye a rotten pear. In it, a hornet 
spun crazily, glazed in slow, glistening juice.

It was my father I saw this morning 
waving to me from the trees. I almost 
called to him, until I came close enough 
to see the shovel, leaning where I had 
left it, in the flickering, deep green shade.

White rice steaming, almost done. Sweet green peas 
fried in onions. Shrimp braised in sesame 
oil and garlic. And my own loneliness. 
What more could I, a young man, want.

by Li-Young Lee
from To Read a Poem
Holt Rinehart and Winston, 1992

 

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

 

On The Hidden Significance Of Everyday Items

Jenny Erpenbeck at The Guardian:

Each time I take a long trip, I lose at least one scarf or hat, sometimes even a pair of sunglasses or a watch. I’ve also lost a number of things when moving house: a piece of moulding from an old rustic wardrobe, a few blinds, and once I even lost the typewriter I used to write my first works. Although the hotel rooms I left were small, and the apartments I left were clearly empty, the things were still missing later; somehow, somewhere, they had disappeared in the no man’s land between departure and arrival, it happened so regularly that I began to expect it when packing my suitcase or my boxes, as if it were a sacrifice, a price I had to pay for the change in my circumstances, and in that respect, despite all the randomness, it was still appropriate. However, in the course of my everyday life, the number of things around me never decreased, but rather increased, the piles grew higher, the folders thicker, I could imagine that a fire would break out and I would tuck my diaries, letters, and photo albums under my arm and run out of the house, but fortunately no fire broke out.

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Monday, October 27, 2025

What Made Blogging Different?

Elizabeth Spiers at Talking Points Memo:

Whether I like it or not, the first line of my obituary will probably be that I was the founding editor of Gawker.com, the flagship site of Gawker Media, a sprawling blog network that was put out of business by Peter Thiel and Hulk Hogan in 2016. Nick Denton and I started Gawker in 2002 and I left in late 2003 to go to New York Magazine, so I missed some of Gawker’s greatest hits and biggest misses, but the early ‘00s were what I now think of as the heyday of blogging. (Talking Points Memo was started in 2000.)

Since then, popular blogs have been commercialized; added comment sections and video; migrated to social media platforms; and been subsumed by large media companies. The growth of social media in particular has wiped out a particular kind of blogging that I sometimes miss: a text-based dialogue between bloggers that required more thought and care than dashing off 180 or 240 characters and calling it a day. In order to participate in the dialogue, you had to invest some effort in what media professionals now call “building an audience” and you couldn’t do that simply by shitposting or responding in facile ways to real arguments.

This was largely a function of technical limitations.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

The evolutionary benefits of getting drunk

Jonny Thomson at Big Think:

“The classic example of a hijack is masturbation,” Edward Slingerland tells me. We’re talking about all the evolutionary quirks that humans tend to exploit — the cases where we’re “built” for one purpose, but decide to put that structure to other uses. And masturbation is a classic example.

In this week’s Mini Philosophy interview, I spoke with Slingerland about his book Drunk, in which he outlines his “intoxication thesis.” Slingerland argues it’s quite common to think that getting drunk is an evolutionary mistake. Some early Homo sapiens drank too much fermented fruit juice and discovered it was pretty fun. So they told their mates and, altogether, they clinked their frothy ciders and sang bawdy songs about hunting and gathering. But the human brain and body were not built to get drunk. Alcohol is effectively a poison. Our bodies don’t like it — or so the argument goes.

The intoxication thesis says this is all wrong. For Slingerland, drinking alcohol and getting drunk are important to human well-being and complex societies. It might not be what evolution “intended,” but it’s certainly given us a reproductive and interspecies advantage.

So, how is getting drunk different from other “evolutionary mistakes”? And what possible benefits might getting drunk give us? Today, we find out.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.