Ultralightweight sonar plus AI lets tiny drones navigate like bats

Nitin Sanket at The Conversation:

To help small aerial robots navigate in the dark and other low-visibility environments, my colleagues and I developed an ultrasound-based perception system inspired by bat echolocation.

Current robots rely heavily on cameras or light detection and ranging, known as lidar, or both. But these sensors fail in visually challenging conditions, such as smoke, fog, dust, snow or complete darkness.

I’m a scientific engineer who develops bio-inspired microrobots. To solve this challenge, my research team looked at nature’s experts at navigating in poor visibility: bats. They thrive in dark, damp and dusty caves and can detect obstacles as thin as a human hair using echolocation while weighing as little as two paper clips. They emit sound waves and listen to weak echoes reflected from objects.

However, enabling this sensing on aerial robots is extremely challenging because propellers generate a lot of noise. It is a bit like trying to listen to your friend while a jet engine is taking off next to you.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

On Ben Lerner’s Transcription

Maggie Millner at n+1:

Transcription is his first book written as an elegy, a mode that comes with a thornier-than-usual crop of formal mandates. What kind of verbal machine is an elegy supposed to be, let alone one for intellectual giants like Waldrop or Kluge? To honor the departed mentors in true mimetic fashion, the ideal book should both describe and ventriloquize them, incorporating these writers’ love of slippage and fragmentation, their aversion to cliché and self-seriousness, their taste for the marginal and off-kilter over the exhaustive and august. It should constellate their favorite metaphors and métiers: dreams, angels, ghosts, “apothegms.” It should resist hyperbole. It should purloin language and motifs from their own books and letters, enacting the alchemy of artistic influence. It should alert us to the limits of memory and bend our sense of linear time. It should also, preferably, and wherever possible, approximate the conditions of death itself.

Implausibly, Transcription pulls off all this and more. It is a lovely, desponding, idiosyncratic novel, anchored in a series of dialogues about artmaking, technology, and literal and figurative parenthood.

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

‘Stay Alive,’ about daily life in Nazi Berlin, shows how easy it is to just go along

John Powers at NPR:

It’s been 80 years since Adolf Hitler shot himself in his bunker, yet our fascination with the Nazi era seems eternal. By now I’ve read and seen so many different things that I’m always surprised when somebody offers a new angle on what the Nazis wrought.

Ian Buruma does this in Stay Alive: Berlin, 1939-1945, a new book about living in a country where you have no control over what happens. Inspired by the experience of his Dutch father, Leo, who was forced to do factory work in Berlin, Buruma uses diaries, memoirs and some personal interviews — most of the witnesses are dead, of course — to explore how it felt to be in Berlin during World War II. He weaves together a chronicle that carries Berliners from the triumphant days when Germany steamrolled Poland and daily life felt almost “normal” (unless you were Jewish, of course) through the end of the war when bombs pulverized the city, and Soviet soldiers arrived to rape and pillage.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

The Push for Artificial Inheritance

Ashley Smart in Undark Magazine:

Last June, at a conference and retreat center not far from downtown Berkeley, California, around 100 people gathered to mull a new, techno-centric future of human reproduction. There was the physics professor moonlighting as a biotech company executive. There was the secret author of a widely read newsletter with a reputation for controversial takes on race and intelligence. There was the fertility specialist with a practice in nearby San Ramon. There was, by way of video feed, the Harvard professor whose foundational work in genetics had arguably helped lay the groundwork for a meeting like this to happen in the first place.

And there was an unmistakable interest in genetically modifying human embryos — to spare them from disease, yes, but also to engineer smarter, stronger, more resilient human beings.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

This May Be the Most Important Medical Story of the Decade

Jeff Coller in The New York Times:

When KJ Muldoon was born in the summer of 2024, his parents were told he had a disease so rare, it strikes about one in 1.3 million newborns. His condition, a severe deficiency of an enzyme known as CPS1, left his tiny body unable to properly break down protein, flooding his blood with toxins that could cause brain damage or death. A liver transplant could correct the problem, but KJ was too young and too fragile to undergo one. With each passing day, the risk of irreversible neurological damage grew. What happened next may become the most important medical story of the decade. In just six months, a team at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and Penn Medicine designed a personalized therapy that could correct the single misspelled letter in KJ’s DNA using a gene editing technology known as CRISPR. To get the therapy inside KJ’s cells, doctors relied on the same kind of mRNA technology that powered the Covid-19 vaccines. He received his first dose at 6 months old. One year later, KJ is walking, talking and thriving at home with his family.

…A key question is how the F.D.A. would enforce manufacturing standards for individualized treatments. If the standards are too onerous for each customized treatment, then the platform won’t be able to scale up. Even with the right regulatory framework, there would still need to be a commercial infrastructure to use it. No pharmaceutical company is going to build a manufacturing line for a disease that affects 12 people. Someone has to build the bridge between a one-off academic breakthrough and a repeatable clinical service, and right now there is little funding for that.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Thursday Poem

A Postcard from Tehran

Where the quiet-coloured end of evening smiles, Miles and miles— Robert Browning

bed-bruised I opened eyes on pellucid puddles
after the last night’s rain, the lissom branches
of juniper swayed rather edited by the wind
picking like a pen on a page makes me jot down
over a cup of tea, a well-earned security strip
by the news that a friend in Tehran had died,

we shared Hafiz, set to collaborate on an exegesis
on Rumi, talked in Farsi on the phone, our lingual
consanguinity, an elongated cadence on the tongue,
like moosiqi, other guttural Arabic sounds softened,

last summer, he sent me a postcard from Isfahan
peach blossoms in umbrous orchids, the clouds
returning like aerial strikes, as if skies missed
them over there under shapeless rubble, like
stanzas abandoned in despair, smoked eyes
a parental congregation of school girls|
bombed, moist but unyielding, and the world
disputes what if a false flag!

crepuscular hues around mountains ringed by
a halation halo, people stick to their tasks, burials
break the monotony, on viridescent slopes
a few sheep grazing, come home.

Prof, Dr. Rizwan 
Institute of English Studies
Punjab University
Lahore Pakistan

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Wednesday, April 8, 2026

Gray took over the modern world but color may be returning

Frank Jacobs at Big Think:

No, you haven’t suddenly gone colorblind. This map is in color. In fact, it is a map of color — specifically, of each U.S. state’s favorite house paint color. It’s just that those favorites look like a swatch book for a funeral parlor — like fifty shades of gray.

Well, gray-ish. From Hawaii to Maine, from Alaska to Florida, the most popular shade for your home’s exterior is some variation of gray, off-white, beige, or greige — a hue so existentially undecided that it can’t commit to being either gray or beige, and so ends up neither, and both.

But how can this be? America is anything but monochrome. It contains multitudes of cultures, climates, and landscapes, and people who disagree, loudly and publicly, about nearly everything. So why, when Americans need a tin of house paint, do they so often reach for the neutral shelf? Why does the average house in this great and varied nation look like it’s been dipped in a vat of Resigned Indifference®?

The answer is a phenomenon dubbed “the grayening”: a gradual but relentless draining of pigment, not just from exteriors but also from interiors and from the stuff of everyday life, like cars and phones.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

How Grains and Grasses Fed (and Still Feed) Humankind

David George Haskell at Literary Hub:

As I walk through the broomsedge in June, dozens of grasshoppers clatter away with every footstep. Bees and wasps wing past, leafhoppers spring, and beetles scurry for cover. This productivity is why so many birds depend on grasslands for their breeding or wintering. Grasslands, especially those in humid areas with good soil, provision their local food webs as richly as do forests.

Grasses also build soil. Their leaves send about two thirds of all the food they make to the underworld. There, roots tunnel many meters down. As they grow, they break up clay and rock, exude sugars and other molecules, and interweave their cells with fungi. When the roots die, they add spongy organic matter to the soil. This soil‑building process is so productive that it lifts the ground. When a degraded grassland returns to health, the ground heaves up, as if inhaling with relief.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Moral relativism has nothing to do with tolerance

Matt Lutz at Humean Being:

My academic work is mostly in the field of metaethics, which is the area of philosophy that investigates the nature of morality. It’s a rather abstract subject, but one that almost everyone has views about, however inchoate. When I try to explain to someone what metaethics is about, I’ll usually say something like, “I study questions like whether or not morality is relative.” This usually gets people on the right page, because everyone has heard of the idea of moral relativism, and everyone has opinions about it. It’s not a particularly popular view! Indeed, the term ‘moral relativism’ is often used as a kind of epithet or term of abuse. (As in, “What kind of stupid moral relativism is this?”) People don’t like moral relativism because they equate it with a kind of unthinking non-judgmentalism or radical tolerance. “That’s what I think, but they think differently, and who am I to judge?” But that’s not what moral relativism is.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

The Lubitsch Touch

David Hudson at The Current:

The 2026 version of The Lubitsch Touch isn’t quite as expansive as the one New York’s Film Forum presented in 2017, but it is certainly just as welcome. Writing in the Village Voice nine years ago, Farran Smith Nehme noted that “the Lubitsch touch” was “the brainchild of a go-getter in the Warner Bros. publicity department named Hal Wallis, when Ernst Lubitsch was under contract at the studio in the 1920s. Thus did future producer Wallis invent one of the few PR slogans ever to be turned by critics into a philosophical debate, to be defined and redefined ever since. On the simplest level, I’d agree with Armond White that the touch was sophistication. You may favor a mistier, more metaphysical definition,” but “we all know the touch when we see it.”

“The phrase hovers over the filmmaker like a halo,” wrote Siri Hustvedt in her 2019 essay on Lubitsch’s final completed feature, Cluny Brown (1947). “It appears to be a quality of visual and verbal grace that cannot be reduced to any particular aspect of production. As far as I can tell, no writer has mentioned that, whatever it means, it summons the tactile sense, what is never present for any moviegoer except by imagination. Lubitsch loved to evoke that missing sensual element by suggestion—especially the play and pleasure of human sexuality.”
more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Chuck Close and Pulp

Benjamin Clifford at the Brooklyn Rail:

Take Self-Portrait (Rigid) (1982), one of the most straightforward examples of what Close is up to. In this work, the bearded and bespectacled face of the artist, familiar from his paintings, is assembled as an orderly array of handmade paper chicklets, small squares in twenty-four shades of gray that Close has marshalled into a pixelated image. Close’s characteristic grid structure maps the material surface of the image’s support, marking the lines of division between individual image units: inexpressive squares of pulp paper that measure out the surface of the page one cell at a time. But in many of Close’s later paintings that make the geometric structure of their composition visible, the grid also serves as a kind of screen to look through onto a pictorial space that, although shallow, is certainly volumetric and illusive. One cannot help but think of Leon Battista Alberti’s famous veil: the gridded scrim the painter interposed between his eye and his subject as a means of regimenting the perception of space. Remnants of this optical experience remain in the pulp paper works, even those as decisively material- and surface-oriented as Self-Portrait (Rigid).

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Mini models of the human brain are revealing how this complex organ takes shape

Alison Abbott in Nature:

The development of the human brain, with its extraordinary range of cognitive abilities, is an awe-inspiring feat of evolution. Each of its tens of billions of cells must be born at precisely the right time, migrate to the correct locations, differentiate into as many as 3,000 distinct cell types, and form exquisitely specific synaptic connections with one another. Most of this happens before birth, but development continues for nearly three more decades.

None of this is easy to study. Conventionally, scientists have relied on animal models and scarce human brain tissue. But the advent of tiny laboratory-grown models of human brains called organoids has transformed their options.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Wednesday Poem

Dear March—Come in

Dear March—Come in—
How glad I am—
I hoped for you before—
Put down your Hat—
You must have walked—
How out of Breath you are—
Dear March, how are you, and the Rest—
Did you leave Nature well—
Oh March, Come right upstairs with me—
I have so much to tell—

I got your Letter, and the Birds—
The Maples never knew that you were coming—
I declare – how Red their Faces grew—
But March, forgive me—
And all those Hills you left for me to Hue—
There was no Purple suitable—
You took it all with you—

Who knocks? That April—
Lock the Door—
I will not be pursued—
He stayed away a Year to call
When I am occupied—
But trifles look so trivial
As soon as you have come

That blame is just as dear as Praise
And Praise as mere as Blame—

by Emily Dickinson

 

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Tuesday, April 7, 2026

What’s in a Name? A livelihood, if that name is Banksy

Leann Davis Alspaugh at Acroteria:

The artist known as Banksy has made a fortune in graffiti and irony and ironic graffiti. No, he’s not the guy—we now know that Banksy is a middle-aged Englishman named Robin Gunningham—who taped a banana to the wall with silver duct tape. (Maurizio Cattelan sold Comedian at a Sotheby’s auction in 2024 for $6.2 million.) Nor is he responsible for the pair of glasses left on the floor of the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, a stunt that the museum took in stride as a Marcel Duchamp-style prank. (The culprits were 17-year olds who in the spirit of “I could have made that” passed off the glasses as art.) Or the two men who, just weeks after the October 2025 Louvre heist, smuggled a fake painting into the museum, a portrait of the two “artists” in Renaissance garb in a frame made of Legos, and hung it on a gallery wall. They filmed themselves and the stunt, of course, went viral.

This kind of sophomoric nonsense makes Banksy’s work seem downright profound. Perhaps his most infamous work was “Love Is in the Bin,” a framed painting from 2006 of a girl with a heart-shaped balloon.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Dawkins’s paradox: dissecting the body’s battle to keep selfish genes in check

C. Brandon Ogbunugafor in Nature:

Some thirty-five years ago, biologist Richard Dawkins coined the phrase “paradox of the organism” to encapsulate a conundrum. If genes are ‘selfish’ — driven to increase their own chances of being transmitted to the next generation — some of them might act in ways that harm the organism as a whole.

For example, sections of DNA can ‘jump’ to different parts of the genome, copying themselves into other locations and, thus, shuffling genetic material. Such ‘jumping genes’ constitute nearly half of the human genome and are crucial for driving evolution and increasing genetic diversity. But they can also cause harmful mutations, and even cancer, when their insertion disrupts key genes that regulate cell growth.

In The Paradox of the Organism, leading evolutionary theorists and philosophers explore such conflicts in a series of essays. They consider how a body made of myriad competing constituents can function as a coherent system, finely tuned towards one goal: maximizing the chances of surviving and reproducing.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.