The DNA Helix Changed How We Thought About Ourselves

Carl Zimmer in The New York Times:

The discovery of the structure of DNA in the early 1950s is one of the most riveting dramas in the history of science, crammed with brilliant research, naked ambition, intense rivalry and outright deception. There were many players, including Rosalind Franklin, a wizard of X-ray crystallography, and Francis Crick, a physicist in search of the secret of life. Now, with the death of the American geneticist James Watson at 97 on Thursday, the last of those players is gone.

That wrenching drama ultimately changed how we conceived of life, and of ourselves. As the discovery of DNA recedes into history, it becomes difficult to even imagine how people thought about life before that breakthrough. In earlier centuries, natural philosophers would write about a mysterious “vital force” inside of cells that set life apart from inanimate matter. Physicians noticed hereditary afflictions carried down through the generations, but they had no idea of how that happened.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Sunday, November 9, 2025

The world without hegemony

Manjeet S Pardesiis and Amitav Acharya in Aeon:

The liberal international order or Pax Americana, the world order built by the United States after the Second World War, is coming to an end. Not surprisingly, this has led to fears of disorder and chaos and, even worse, impending Chinese hegemony or Pax Sinica. Importantly, this mode of thinking that envisages the necessity of a dominant or hegemonic power underwriting global stability was developed by 20th-century US scholars of international relations, and is known as the hegemonic stability theory (HST).

In particular, hegemonic stability theory developed out of the work of the American economist Charles P Kindleberger. In his acclaimed book The World in Depression 1929-1939 (1973), Kindleberger argued that: ‘The world economic system was unstable unless some country stabilised it,’ and that, in 1929, ‘the British couldn’t and the United States wouldn’t.’ While Kindleberger was mainly concerned with economic order, his view was transformed by international relations scholars to associate hegemony with all sorts of things. In particular, a hegemonic power is generally expected to perform one or all of three main roles: first, as the dominant military power that ensures peace and stability; second, as the central economic actor within the global system; and third, as a cultural and ideational leader – either actively disseminating its political ideas across the system or serving as a model that others seek to emulate.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

A State-led Financial Empire

Johannes Petry in Phenomenal World:

Having long prioritized domestic stability over the pursuit of a global role for the Renminbi (RMB), Beijing has recently accelerated its construction of a parallel financial architecture. Without seeking to fully replace the dollar’s global dominance, it has nevertheless sought to reduce its exposure to US monetary power while embedding its trading partners in RMB-denominated circuits of trade and finance.

Whereas British and US financial dominance relied on open capital markets, private banking networks, and the global expansion of highly financialized instruments—from deep derivatives markets to speculative financial activity increasingly detached from the real economy—China’s strategy is state-led and more functional in orientation. RMB internationalization is more closely organized around trade settlement, investment channels, and funding for production and infrastructure. It deliberately avoids the full liberalization and speculative excesses that have inflated the size of the USD-based system far beyond underlying economic activity. Rather than building vast global capital markets, Beijing constructs controlled channels that facilitate cross-border RMB use while maintaining state oversight. This produces a qualitatively different financial empire: smaller in scale compared to the sprawling dollar system, but informed by trade relations, value chains, and political alliances, and structured around managed connectivity.

These infrastructures are not neutral technical fixes. Their design determines who can access liquidity, how transactions are routed, and under which rules financial activity takes place. By embedding itself as a central node in these networks, China is doing more than internationalizing its currency: it is quietly reshaping the architecture of global finance by enhancing Beijing’s financial autonomy, reducing its exposure to US sanctions and monetary policy spillovers, while binding economic partners in the Global South more tightly to Beijing.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Boyhood

Yuri Slezkine in the new journal Equator:

I grew up in Moscow, in a succession of communal apartments. The first book I learnt by heart (according to my father, who kept track and took pictures) was Ram the Baby Elephant, published in 1959, when I turned three. When Ram was born, all the animals came to say hello. The bear played the double bass, the giraffe danced the Russian squat dance, the camel brought a huge pacifier, the hippo got stuck in the doorway, and the rhino claimed to have walked “all the way from the Ganges”.

New books introduced more characters: a cast of local heroes, led by the wolf, the fox and the hare, and a large selection of jungle dwellers, including Bagheera, Baloo, and, from a much thicker book, the lion, the bull and two jackals named Dimanaka and Karataka.

Soon, animals – foreign, domestic and stuffed (in 1969 Winnie-the-Pooh was reborn as a popular Soviet cartoon character, Vinni Pukh) – were joined by mostly human orphans, robbers, soldiers, princesses, emperors and stargazers. Things happened once upon a time, in faraway lands. Fools, shepherds and youngest sons usually won. Commercial transactions involved ducats, thalers, guineas, sovereigns, doubloons and, most memorably, rupees, which were related to rubles, but could buy magic carpets and dancing cobras.

The books of my adolescence came with specific realms, names and uniforms. At the centre lay the Russian noble estate, surrounded by an overgrown park with a lily-covered pond, populated by old generals, eternal students, French governors, German tutors and a girl with an open book. It existed in a mythic space, unnamed and unchanging, troubled but safely landlocked.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

London Mayor Sadiq Khan: Zohran Mamdani’s Win Is a Victory for Hope

Sadiq Khan in Time Magazine:

A couple of weeks before his election victory, Zohran Mamdani stood in front of a mosque in the Bronx. There, he gave the most personal speech of his campaign—a speech which sounded like it had been months, perhaps years, in the making. Just days before, a New York radio host had suggested Zohran would be “cheering” if another 9/11 happened on his watch. It was the high-water mark of a rising tide of anti-Muslim hatred that Mamdani had faced since the moment he declared his candidacy last year.

Zohran’s response was defiant. He spoke about his pride in his faith. He talked about the climate of fear which, like many Muslim New Yorkers, he had faced for much of his life. And he recalled the advice of a community elder who had suggested that if he wanted to make it in politics, he’d be better off keeping his religion to himself. The speech took courage. Zohran could have chosen to stay quiet and spend the final fortnight of the campaign focused on his core messages, ignoring his critics’ attempts to lower the tone and use his faith to other him. Sometimes, though, we must stand up and say enough is enough.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

The Essential Kate Atkinson

Sadie Stein in The New York Times:

You know instantly when you’re in Kate Atkinson’s world. It’s dark, slightly Gothic, mordantly funny, keenly observed, highly textured and always full of surprises. Atkinson my not be easy to characterize — she’s a master of every genre she tries — but one thing’s for sure: You’ll be completely absorbed.

In her long, prolific career, the British author has written crime thrillers, trippy time-jumping fantasies that flirt with magical realism, uncanny short stories, literary fiction, gothic family sagas, metaphysical quests and straight period pieces. For fifteen books, she has kept readers guessing, entertained, baffled, thrilled and eager to return to her distinctive, slightly warped universe. You might not love all of them equally — they’re too different to please everyone — but you’ll never get tired of observing her inventive mind at work.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Sunday Poem

Amá Teaches Me How to Whistle

She said, it’s facil, look up, kiss everything,
hold the sun between your mouth,

blow like this * *   * *   * ****
**** * *  * * **** ****

after I told her I was a woman, she wrinkled
the space between us by hugging me.

She told me, “you confused?”
I said, is the fire confused when it eats?

& told her, I’m going by she & my real name,
the one I was born with, not given, she said,

“you are not what it says on your driver’s license,”
amá, gracias for believing in this ordinary phenomenon,

like the DNA that made grapes, it made them
a million times before, a million times after,

I have one in my mouth, how round this knowledge,
the gush in my mouth: sweet, tart, & bitter, oh amá,

I finally learned how to whistle like you:

by Moncho Alvarado
from Split This Rock

Vocal rendering by author> here:

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Friday, November 7, 2025

Having lived in the United States for a few years, I have either struggled to understand democracy in practice or struggled to keep up with it

Wen Gao in The Common Reader:

As a child, I imagined America as a truly democratic place where I could speak, disagree, and still listen. I even used to quote half seriously, “I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it,” from an American movie I watched, when I argued with my little friends. That line felt like a promise. I thought that was what America looked like. Later, I realized that the promise was harder to keep. I remember when I saw Charlie Kirk being killed while debating, I felt lost, totally lost. What about freedom of speech?

Having lived in the United States for a few years, I have either struggled to understand democracy in practice or struggled to keep up with it. People laugh at Trump jokes, and in many public spaces, it feels like a small ritual; you must say something about him, in public or personal conversation. I understand it, and I do not. Should I laugh too, and say, “Yes, that is awful,” or stay silent with something I do not truly understand?

Sometimes I sit there, smiling faintly, unsure if the laughter is about politics or about belonging.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Notes from the near-future of AI

Eli Pariser at Second Thoughts:

I attended The Curve, a conference of ~350 top AI lab leaders and scientists, safety activists and alarmists, political advisors and lobbyists, journalists, and civil society leaders. The event took place in Lighthaven, a quirky cluster of houses in Berkeley that have been retrofitted into small conference spaces. Many sessions were in living room-sized spaces, so it was all very personable and informal — an impressive feat by the organizing team.

Many participants seemed thrilled, awed, and also deeply worried. Someone described it as “snorting pure San Francisco.” At 45 I was one of the older participants — the average age was mid-30s, but many of the most powerful people were in their late 20s. Pretty much every single person I talked to was smart, relatively humble, and pleasant. You couldn’t throw a rock without hitting someone with a large Substack following.

There was broad consensus that the pace of progress in AI models will continue to accelerate, though lots of debate about how quickly.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Moon Duchin on the ‘Mathematical Quagmire’ of Gerrymandering

Siobhan Roberts in the New York Times:

“Today I would say the whole world should be paying particular attention to this class of problem, which I’ll call the problem of democracy,” she noted in her preamble.

Dr. Duchin defines partisan gerrymandering as follows: The party in control draws district lines to get more representation and advance an agenda. It is sometimes described as politicians choosing voters, rather than voters choosing politicians; Dr. Duchin agreed with that characterization.

This summer she was preoccupied — overwhelmed, in fact — with what she called “the nuclear redistricting wars.” She serves as an expert in the Texas redistricting lawsuit, which challenges a congressional map aggressively redrawn in favor of Republicans.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Is Humanistic Knowledge Useless? And so what if it is?

Baskin and Lipkin in The Point:

Michael Lipkin

I’m going to roll up my sleeves and attempt a dirty, but I think necessary, job. I’m going to try to defend the humanities, or at least humanities scholarship, as it exists in its current form. I should say, before I do, that my road to something like a permanent job in the humanities has been a winding one. I remember, as a graduate student, being driven absolutely insane by how sanguine my professors were about our discipline. They were trying to reassure me, I think. But they succeeded only in making me envy and then resent them. So, to you, the reader, I say: wherever you’ve been, I’ve been there, too. I know the adjunct life. I know precarity. I know indifference. I know downright hostility. I’ve taught at diploma mills and in the Ivy League and everything in between. I understand.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

The Hardest Part of Creating Conscious AI Might Be Convincing Ourselves It’s Real

David Cornell in Singularity Hub:

As far back as 1980, the American philosopher John Searle distinguished between strong and weak AI. Weak AIs are merely useful machines or programs that help us solve problems, whereas strong AIs would have genuine intelligence. A strong AI would be conscious.

Searle was skeptical of the very possibility of strong AI, but not everyone shares his pessimism. Most optimistic are those who endorse functionalism, a popular theory of mind that takes conscious mental states to be determined solely by their function. For a functionalist, the task of producing a strong AI is merely a technical challenge. If we can create a system that functions like us, we can be confident it is conscious like us.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Jean Rollin, Poet of the Fantastique

Samm Deighan at The Current:

French writer and director Jean Rollin is mostly remembered for a series of dreamlike vampire films he made beginning in the late 1960s: The Rape of the Vampire (1968), The Nude Vampire (1970), The Shiver of the Vampires (1971), Requiem for a Vampire (1971), and Lips of Blood (1975). But thinking of him simply as a director of supernatural horror is far too limited. His approach to genre tropes was highly unconventional, more influenced by surrealism, fairy tales, and fantastique literature than mainstream horror. This is most apparent in his characters: vampires are portrayed as tragic and romantic figures, rather than as bloodthirsty monsters, and his protagonists are often complex young women who embark on strange adventures through otherworldly landscapes.

Rollin was raised in an artistic family outside of Paris; his father was an actor and theater director, and his mother was an artists’ model in the same social circles as renowned surrealist artists and intellectuals. This influence, combined with Rollin’s childhood love of cinema, serials, and comic books, inspired him to pursue work in a film studio as a teenager. He began as a crew member on documentary productions and worked his way up to becoming a film editor for the French army during his military service.

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Car Talk

Cynthia Zarin at the Paris Review:

I learned to drive in the parking lot of what was then called the A&P supermarket, which marked the turnoff to a house my family owned then, by a cove and across from a small harbor. The idea was that my father would teach me. During the summers I spent a good deal of time alone with my father on a nineteen-foot sailboat called the Nausicaa. In the Odyssey, Nausicaa, the daughter of King Alcinous and Queen Arete, is washing clothes by an inlet on the island of Phaeacia, near where Odysseus, after a shipwreck, has washed ashore. When he appears, roused from slumber by the splash in a tidepool engineered by the goddess Athena, Nausicaa’s startled handmaidens flee, but “Alcinous’ daughter held fast, for Athena planted courage within her heart.”

Odysseus is naked. Nausicaa lends him some laundry to wear and takes him home to meet her parents, whom he entertains by telling stories: The Nausicaa episode is a frame for many of the tales of the Odyssey. Oddly, her name is often translated as “ship burner.” The boat had come with that moniker, and it didn’t occur to my father to change it.

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Thursday, November 6, 2025

What I learnt from the Soviet Adventure Library

Yuri Slezkine at Equator:

These books were born in Western Europe and North America at the confluence of imperial expansion, mass literacy and the rise of the translation industry, popular periodicals and book serialisation. They owed their existence to the arrival of boys as a separate – and increasingly profitable – segment of the book-reading public. Robert Louis Stevenson described Treasure Island as “a story for boys”; Haggard, his imitator and competitor, offered King Solomon’s Mines “to boys and to those who are boys at heart”.

In Russia, these books had become required reading by the turn of the twentieth century. My grandfather, born in 1885, read them, and so did my father, my father’s war-veteran friends and most of my classmates, no matter what their fathers and grandfathers did for a living.

In Speak, Memory (1951), Vladimir Nabokov remembers “savouring” The Headless Horseman as a child in St. Petersburg, the book’s watery-grey frontispiece turning “completely bleached” in the blaze of his imagination.

More here.  [Free registration required.]

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

What is DNS? A computer engineer explains this foundational piece of the web – and why it’s the internet’s Achilles’ heel

Doug Jacobson in The Conversation:

When millions of people suddenly couldn’t load familiar websites and apps during the Amazon Web Services, or AWS, outage on Oct. 20, 2025, the affected servers weren’t actually down. The problem was more fundamental – their names couldn’t be found.

The culprit was DNS, the Domain Name System, which is the internet’s phone book. Every device on the internet has a numerical IP address, but people use names like amazon.com or maps.google.com. DNS acts as the translator, turning those names into the correct IP addresses so your device knows where to send the request. It works every time you click on a link, open an app or tap “log in.” Even when you don’t type a name yourself, such as in a mobile app, one is still being used in the background.

To understand why DNS failures can be so disruptive, it’s helpful to know how the Domain Name System is constructed. The internet contains over 378 million registered domain names, far too many for a single global phone book. Imagine a single book containing every American’s name and phone number. So DNS was intentionally designed to be decentralized.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.