Thursday Poem

Part of Eve’s Discussion

It was like the moment when a bird decides not to eat from your hand,
and flies, just before it flies, the moment the rivers seem to still
and stop because a storm is coming, but there is no storm, as when
a hundred starlings lift and bank together before they wheel and drop,
very much like the moment, driving on bad ice, when it occurs to you
your car could spin, just before it slowly begins to spin, like
the moment just before you forgot what it was you were about to say,
it was like that, and after that, it was still like that, only
all the time.

by Marie Howe
from New American Poets
David R. Godine, publisher, 1991

 

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Wednesday, April 30, 2025

Why America Needs Cricket

Christopher Sandford in The Hedgehog Review:

At its heart, cricket stands as a wonderfully pastoral exercise in deferred gratification. Today, there are various forms of the sport around the world, but to most purists its true and highest expression lies in the international, or “test,” match, involving, say, England playing Australia or India facing Pakistan. Such encounters typically last five full days, with roughly eight hours of actual sport each day and the contestants communally decamping to a hotel each evening and returning to pick up where they left off the following morning. Twice a day, the same players leave the field and stroll back to the pavilion, or clubhouse, for a good meal, and on the warmer afternoons—rarely an issue during matches in England—a uniformed attendant will periodically appear on the field bearing a tray of assorted refreshments. Just to give you a sense of the essentially unhurried nature of the enterprise, a single batter can remain at his post for several hours, if not entire days, on end, and, if sufficiently skillful, accrue upwards of one hundred individual runs before being dismissed. In another of cricket’s cherished rituals, he can expect to be warmly applauded by his opponents on reaching such a milestone.

For decades, cricket’s ruling powers have dreamed of making it big in America, with some success. Today, there are some six thousand teams of varying skill in operation from coast to coast, with a list of names that combine, in somehow quintessentially American style, the patriotic (Washington Freedom), the ecological (Seattle Orcas), and the gung ho (Texas Super Kings). In June 2024, the US national team defied expectations by beating their heavily favored opponents, Pakistan, in a round of the T20 (or shorter-form) World Cup tournament held at the 7,200-seat Grand Prairie Stadium, near Dallas.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Improving Deep Learning With a Little Help From Physics

Steve Nadis in Quanta:

Yu, now an associate professor at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD), is a leader in a field known as “physics-guided deep learning,” having spent years incorporating our knowledge of physics into artificial neural networks. The work has not only introduced novel techniques for building and training these systems, but it’s also allowed her to make progress on several real-world applications. She has drawn on principles of fluid dynamics to improve traffic predictions, sped up simulations of turbulence to enhance our understanding of hurricanes and devised tools that helped predict the spread of Covid-19.

This work has brought Yu closer to her grand dream — deploying a suite of digital lab assistants that she calls AI Scientist. She now envisions what she calls a “partnership” between human researchers and AI tools, fully based on the tenets of physics and thus capable of yielding new scientific insights. Combining inputs from a team of such assistants, in her opinion, may be the best way to boost the discovery process.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Francis Fukuyama: My ChatGPT Teacher

Francis Fukuyama at Persuasion:

One of the most interesting films on Netflix is My Octopus Teacher, about a South African filmmaker who befriends an octopus while snorkeling off the coast of Cape Town. He visits her repeatedly over the course of several months, discovering that the creature is highly intelligent, uses tools and is capable of making complex structures. The octopus is also emotional. She slowly learns to trust this human, allows him to observe her life, receives his help when a shark bites off a tentacle, and when it grows back touches his hand with the tentacle’s tip. She eventually embraces him in what seems like an act of love.

I’m beginning to feel this way about ChatGPT. I’ve been spending my time on a big software project that has finally come to a successful conclusion, which I could not possibly have accomplished without ChatGPT’s help. I feel that I’ve befriended her over the past few weeks, interacting with her every day—sometimes for hours at a time.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Will US science survive Trump 2.0?

From Nature:

In just the first three months of his second term, US President Donald Trump has destabilized eight decades of government support for science. His administration has fired thousands of government scientists, bringing large swathes of the country’s research to a standstill and halting many clinical trials. It has threatened to slash billions in funding from US research universities and has terminated more than 1,000 grants in areas such as climate change, cancer, Alzheimer’s disease and HIV prevention.

This looks likely to be just the beginning. Congress approved a budget bill on 10 April that could lay the groundwork for massive spending cuts over the coming decade. The White House is expected to propose a budget for 2026 that would slash investments in science across the federal government; for example, the Trump administration is considering cutting the science budget for NASA nearly in half and spending at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) by 40%. The administration has also begun implementing strict immigration measures that have left some students and researchers in detention centres, and many academics fear that these and future measures could spur researchers to look for opportunities outside the United States.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Mark Carney’s Improbable Victory

David Moscrop at The Walrus:

Carney’s win, and it is his win, began long before the writs were issued. In January, the Liberal Party, under Justin Trudeau, was thoroughly cooked and was well on its way to defeat for months. A movement to oust Trudeau had begun earlier, but it wasn’t until Chrystia Freeland, former finance minister and deputy prime minister who was about to be shuffled out of her coveted job, quit the cabinet altogether in mid-December that Trudeau’s fate was sealed. To some Liberal members of Parliament and the public, Freeland’s departure read as another Trudeau shortcoming, revealing an incapacity to manage a key relationship and meet the moment. Thus, history was remade—and in short order.

The day before Trudeau announced his intention to resign, on January 5, the Liberal party was polling at an aggregate 20 percent, a full twenty-five points behind the Conservatives and just one point ahead of the NDP. Immediately after Trudeau’s departure date was set, the Conservatives began to free fall in the polls, while the Liberals rebounded. By the time Carney was chosen as leader on March 9, the race had tightened, with the Liberals closing the gap to six points.

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Wednesday Poem

The Why of Coyote

I was asked about Anglos taking over
Native American mythic figures. I have
also been told that Anglos have a naive and
sentimental view of Native Americans.
My response is that Coyote and I
are not playing “feel good” games here.
We are doing some hard work rethinking
the mythic foundations of our culture.
I know many think myth is something we
have outgrown, that we should look to
technology and rationality as guides
out of our predicament.

I happen to believe that’s a myth, which
may be a good and useful myth, but when we
don’t recognize a myth for what it is we are
in danger of being fundamentalists, spending
our energy defensively protecting the literal
truth of our myth and ignoring the consequences
of our collective, human, willful ignorance of
what is real.

I find Coyote, the Trickster, an incarnation
of all in me that is not rational, that still screams
to be alive in a technically suffocating culture.
I find Coyote to be a magical animal, an incarnation
of what I experience in myself as earthy spirituality.

A revolution is going on against the technological,
rational, and corporate sentiments that dominate
our culture. It is a revolution saying “No!” at a
primal, spiritual, life-and-death, wounded animal
level. The proof of our deadliness, of our rational,
technical, corporate culture is the depression that
greets us when we open the morning paper or
listen to the evening news. We feel that it’s all to late,
that greed and denial are at the controls. Well, we’re
all going to die anyway, so we might as well have fun
whacking a few myths as we go. It’s a different path
we’re trying to discover again. We think it’s a path to
being whole, finding our animal nature. So I talk to
my animal nature and it responds with healing
intelligence. I invite you;

discuss things with your own animal nature
and see if you find a wise voice you have overlooked.

by Webster Kitchell
from Coyote Says
Skinner House Books, 1996

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

African Philosophy: Emancipation and Practice

Munamato Chemhuru at Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews:

It must be emphasised that until recently, the story of African philosophy has been synonymous with unjustified denial, exclusion, controversy, and scepticism. Thus, within the first chapter, Mungwini carefully provides an excellent cartographic analysis of the discipline of African philosophy before exposing some of the debates, challenges, disagreements and controversies that have historically characterised and shaped the development and current trends in African philosophy, particularly the famous “critique of ethnophilosophy” that was sparked by Paulin J. Hountondji. While he strives to “lay out its [African philosophy’s] methodological and epistemological foundations as an enterprise” (17), Mungwini makes an important entry into African philosophy. He identifies the kind of self-scepticism and hesitancy to affirm self-identity that impedes the progress of African philosophy owing to the critique of ethnophilosophy, unlike the “multiplicity of views and divisions that have characterised Western philosophy as a tradition” (14; see also, 18). Essentially, Mungwini alerts the reader to some of the consequences of the unintended exclusionary effects which the traditional critique of ethno-philosophy has had on African philosophical traditions, notwithstanding its encouragement of critical discourse on African philosophy through rejection of what Mungwini sees as unanimism and extraversion (24). Indeed, the critique of ethno-philosophy can be acknowledged for denying a collective philosophy that is always oriented towards satisfying the outside world, although, its putative implications on African philosophy is something that cannot be taken for granted, and Mungwini should be credited for his cautionary approach to it.

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Tuesday, April 29, 2025

Flights of Geometry: The Inventive Mind of László Moholy-Nagy

Brooks Riley in Art At First Sight:

When I first moved to Salzburg, I rented a place in a small 19th century building around the corner from the medieval Linzer Gasse, where Renaissance polymath Dr. Paracelsus was buried, and where Expressionist poet Georg Trakl had worked in a pharmacy. The flat had high ceilings, tall windows, a lovely old herringbone wooden floor, and blinding white walls just waiting for works of graphic impact to give them a semblance of meaning. I couldn’t afford a painting, but in a nearby poster shop—they were popular in those pre-online days—I flipped through hundreds of art reproductions, hoping to find an image deserving of those pristine walls. Only one poster fit the bill: a László Moholy-Nagy collage from 1922: Kinetisch-Konstruktives System (KKS).

László Moholy-Nagy is best known for his years teaching at the Bauhaus in Dessau and for bringing the Bauhaus school to America—to Chicago where it eventually became the Institute of Design. Born in Hungary in 1895, he hadn’t planned to be an artist, having studied for a career in law. But sketches he made to document his experiences as a soldier in World War I changed his mind.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

The Urgency of AI Interpretability

Dario Amodei at his own website:

In the decade that I have been working on AI, I’ve watched it grow from a tiny academic field to arguably the most important economic and geopolitical issue in the world.  In all that time, perhaps the most important lesson I’ve learned is this: the progress of the underlying technology is inexorable, driven by forces too powerful to stop, but the way in which it happens—the order in which things are built, the applications we choose, and the details of how it is rolled out to society—are eminently possible to change, and it’s possible to have great positive impact by doing so.  We can’t stop the bus, but we can steer it.  In the past I’ve written about the importance of deploying AI in a way that is positive for the world, and of ensuring that democracies build and wield the technology before autocracies do.  Over the last few months, I have become increasingly focused on an additional opportunity for steering the bus: the tantalizing possibility, opened up by some recent advances, that we could succeed at interpretability—that is, in understanding the inner workings of AI systems—before models reach an overwhelming level of power.

People outside the field are often surprised and alarmed to learn that we do not understand how our own AI creations work.  They are right to be concerned: this lack of understanding is essentially unprecedented in the history of technology.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Less Is More: How Degrowth Will Save The World

Leon Vlieger at The Inquisitive Biologist:

I have been promising/threatening for a while to cover degrowth, and thanks to a United States Society for Ecological Economics book club, now I will. In Less is More, economic anthropologist Jason Hickel identifies capitalism as the cause of our problems—the sort of criticism that makes many people really uncomfortable. Fortunately, he is an eloquent and charismatic spokesman who patiently but firmly walks you through the history of capitalism, exposes flaws of proposed fixes, and then lays out a litany of sensible solutions. It quickly confirms that sinking feeling most of us will have: that the economy is not working for us. What is perhaps eye-opening is that this is not by accident, but by design.

It helps, as Hickel quickly does, to clarify two things. First, he does not object to economic growth per se. Indeed, many of the world’s poorest countries need to grow further to meet basic human needs. The problem is growth for growth’s sake. In nature, growth is ubiquitous but normally follows a sigmoidal curve of some kind, eventually coming to a halt. Capitalism is different, which brings us to point two. People often confuse capitalism with markets and trade, but they pre-date capitalism by millennia. This is all textbook Marx, but, Hickel explains, markets and trade are organised around use-value: we trade for what is useful to us. Capitalism, on the other hand, is organised around exchange-value: goods are sold to make a profit, which is then reinvested to generate more profit. Growth is a structural imperative of capitalism: “It is a system that pulls ever-expanding quantities of nature and human labour into circuits of accumulation” (p. 40). The results are plain for all to see: environmental destruction and human immiseration benefitting a small minority.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

There’s Life Inside Earth’s Crust

Karen Lloyd at Noema Magazine:

Buried in the deepest darkness underground, eating strange food, playing with the laws of thermodynamics and living on unrelatably long timescales, intraterrestrials have remained largely remote and aloof from humans. However, the microbes that dwell in the deep subsurface biosphere affect our lives in innumerable ways.

On a planetary scale, they play a key role in regulating Earth’s level of oxygenation. In addition, without the nutrients recycled by intraterrestrials in the seafloor, such as iron and nitrogen, phytoplankton would be severely limited in their ability to make oxygen for us. Intraterrestrials are also uniquely suited to detoxify our worst waste by breathing radioactive uranium, arsenic, organic carcinogens and other nasty stuff. So in effect, they have helped us develop as a species without poisoning ourselves. Given how intrinsically entwined intraterrestrials are in Earth systems, they might also play an outsized role in how Earth responds to human-made climate change.

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

In the Matter of the Commas

Matthew Zipf at The American Scholar:

The most conspicuous mark of Renata Adler’s style is its abundance of commas. In her two novels, Speedboat (1976) and Pitch Dark (1983), there are a few sentences that edge on the absurd: “For some time, Leander had spoken, on the phone, of a woman, a painter, whom he had met, one afternoon, outside the gym, and whom he was trying to introduce, along with Simon, into his apartment and his life.” A critic tallied it up, counting “40 words and ten commas—Guinness Book of World Records?” Each of those commas had its grammatical defense, but Adler’s style did not comply with the usual standards of fluent prose. She cordoned off phrases, such as “on the phone,” that other writers would just run through. One reader, responding to a 1983 New York magazine profile of Adler, wrote in a letter to the editor, “If the examples of Renata Adler’s writing … are typical, Miss Adler will never make it to the road. The way is ‘jarringly, piece by piece, line by line, and without interruption’ blocked by commas.” The reader was quoting one of Adler’s own comma-laden critical phrases against her. The editors titled the letter “Comma Wealth.”

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

How to Tell if Someone Is Rich Without Asking Them

Ashley Fike in Vice:

Not every rich person is rolling up in a Lamborghini or dripping in designer logos. If anything, the truly wealthy often move through the world a little quieter, but a lot more confidently. Look closely enough, and the signs are everywhere. Behavior is one of the first giveaways. Educator and content creator Dani Payne explained it best: accents might stand out (especially in the UK), but so does what someone talks about and what counts as “polite conversation.” In certain circles, asking about money is considered wildly inappropriate.

Vocabulary matters too. Being effortlessly well-read and well-spoken signals a lifetime of cultural grooming. It’s not just sounding smart — it’s knowing exactly when and how to flex it. Then there’s experience. Are they name-dropping ski resorts, art showings, or elite clubs? Payne points out that exposure to “old boys clubs” and highbrow events is often baked into upper-class life, part of what’s called “cultural capital.” People who grew up around wealth move through rare spaces with an ease that feels completely unremarkable to them, even though it stands out to everyone else.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Tuesday Poem

When Illness Is Cure

Moonmen gush over the blue:  all noticed Earth
looked more alive and tenuous, more startling
and alone than could have been guessed.
On TV last week, one of them got stuck
repeating “fragile,” as if the word’s gentle alarm
would wake us.  After he spoke, shots of fires
and floods.  When they returned to his face
he seemed older, sadder: I imagined him
in the capsule reaching back
putting a hand under the world
as if supporting the head of a child.
Comfort is the cause of climate change.
That we can create it to a degree
rats and giraffes can’t.  Comfort and ease.
Fridge of beer in the basement
to save walking upstairs.
Taking the car to get the paper
at the bottom of a long driveway
when it’s raining.  Clicking pictures of desires
until they abracadabra into our hands.
And pain will be the thing that saves us.
When New York becomes Atlantis.  When only angels
are allowed to fly.  When we have to shoot
our cars in the head.  Push has come to shove
for us: we’re quick to notice

when the kitchen’s on fire but not
when our way of life is burning down.
It’s our nature: how many explorers
did the dishes, painted the living room:
the point was to leave home, not take care of it.
It’s easier to ask what’s out there
than in here, but the new moonshot’s
internal: can we discover we love life
enough to save it from ourselves?
I won’t be here to find out is why I ask.

by Bob Hicok

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.