A Great Villain Is a Great American: The United States vs. Sean Combs

Harmony Holiday in The Paris Review:

Prisons are American tourist attractions, and criminals who become fugitives or inmates our outlaw heroes—Al Capone, Alcatraz, Charles Manson, Sing Sing, Angola, Luigi Mangione, O. J. Simpson, Diddy, né Sean Combs. A collective underdog fetish means that the image of a civilian outwitting, outrunning, or confronting “the man” is enough to negate his trespasses. Maybe achieving the apotheosis of success in the United States requires becoming a convict, being threatened with or facing real incarceration and exile, doing time, paying dues, and making a grand comeback. At that finale you can sell that story to restore your fortunes, dignity, and maverick glory. Combs is the latest public figure to go from celebrated to disgraced to tentatively redeemed in some eyes by a show trial and the masculine compulsion to cheer when men get away with terrorizing women. The rapper Jay Electronica stood outside of the courtroom with his two Great Danes on the day the verdict was delivered, and announced, “I’m just here supporting my brother.” He looked half-ashamed, half-deviant about it, like he was both courting and afraid of backlash. Others call Diddy’s comeuppance a legal lynching, insinuating he’s a survivor of a because-he’s-black character assassination, since other powerful, abusive men have yet to be held accountable. It’s a truly American malfunction, this belief that the once oppressed should have the freedom to become as evil and ruthlessly decadent as their oppressors. This is what is sold to the public as prestige, and imitations of it exist at every stratum. With this in mind, Diddy’s story could be construed as a bootstraps tale—from Harlem to Howard to Hollywood endings. His recent downward spiral might be just another buoy, one that will help him ascend anew.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

AI Scans Audio Recordings to Detect Voice Box Cancer

Andrea Lius in The Scientist:

People often “lose their voice” after spending the night cheering for a local sports team or singing along to their favorite songs at a concert. Such overuse can temporarily injure the vocal cords, making people’s voices sound hoarse and strained. But there’s a much more alarming cause that can also alter a person’s voice: laryngeal cancer, which may be fatal if left untreated. Clinicians typically assess this condition using invasive—and at times, unavailable in underserved areas—methods such as endoscopy and biopsy.

In a recent study, researchers found that certain acoustic features could distinguish people with vocal cord lesions from those without based on their voice recordings.1 One of the characteristics that the researchers measured could even differentiate between benign and cancerous lesions. This work, led by Phillip Jenkins, a general surgery resident at Oregon Health and Science University, put forward a non-invasive and more accessible way to diagnose voice disorders. Their findings were published in Frontiers in Digital Health.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Wednesday Poem

On Our Furst Date He Takes  Me to a Fancy French Restaurant in the North End

Creamy linen, flickering centerpiece. My only goal
is to stay with this man. When he points to the vichyssoise
and chortles, what the heck is that? I don’t tell him
about the time I went to Paris on a dare, with a man
I didn’t know, because he promised we could sip
little cups of vichyssoise while staring up at the Eiffel Tower.
Don’t tell him about the wild leeks I’ve yanked
from the ground in both hemispheres, that I track
their ripe diameters on a chart on my wall. Don’t tell him
about the stage I did in New York City, where I burnt
the tattoo on the side of my palm clean off
while lifting a pan of butter-braised shallots
from the overhead grill. The pan that wasn’t mine
so I didn’t know its weight, didn’t know the cadence
of those onions. How the chef ran to save them
while I performed my own first aid, carefully spooning
the shallots into a pot with cream and potatoes and wine
and tarragon. I don’t tell him that at this time last year,
I was in bed with a man who would have licked raw chicken
from my belly button. Or about the girl who lost her job
because she favoured my coq au vin to a steady paycheque,
how she became my muse and I threw out all my bowls
so I could drink from her hips. Don’t tell him
I know exactly what vichyssoise is,
or that I have been in love fourteen and a half times.
No man wants to hear that. A man wants to hear
that this moment, under these lights, in these shoes,
with this air between us, is the only time you have ever felt
this good, this safe, and the only time you ever will.
So I giggle with this man, over everything we do not know,
and by the time I let him kiss me goodnight, I can’t tell
which one of us was lying.

by Yoda Olinyk
from Rattle #88, Summer 2025

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Tuesday, August 12, 2025

James Baldwin’s Apotheosis

Brooke Allen at the Hudson Review:

Hence the absurdity of the bland assumption among some writers of the younger generation that Baldwin would embrace the modern idea of intersectionality. Despite his ready admission that he was thrice challenged—Black, queer, and disadvantaged (at least initially!)—Baldwin’s core philosophy was the essential unity of humanity, “his rejection of all labels and fixed notions of identity as ‘myths’ or ‘lies,’” as his biographer Magdalena J. Zaborowska has written, and she provides ample evidence for this judgment. Art, Baldwin stated, “has its roots in the lives of human beings: the weakness, the strength, the absurdity. . . . It belongs to all of us, and this includes our foes, who are as desperate and as vacuous and as blind as we are and who can only be as evil as we are ourselves.” “[A] victim,” he wrote, “may or may not have a color, just as he may or may not have virtue.” Baldwin’s realization that suffering does not create virtue and that victims are not necessarily good people was, as he knew, a “difficult . . . unpopular notion, for nearly everyone prefers to be defined by his status, which, unlike his virtue, is ready to wear.”
 
This is even more true today, when the intersectional grid draws rigid lines between “oppressor” and “oppressed” that Baldwin, despite the animus against white America that ballooned as he aged, was far too subtle a thinker to accept. His friendships with Jews, whites, Communists, and atheists at DeWitt Clinton High School in the Bronx made him suspicious of easy racial categorization, and “[t]he rich mix of his white, Black, Jewish, leftist, southern, and queer teachers and mentors helped him craft the sophisticated literary tools he used to reach that understanding,” as Zaborowska says.

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Among the Blasphemers

Gerald Howard at n+1:

Paul Elie remembers things differently and far more deeply. A cradle Catholic and still an observant one, he has over the years carved out an admirable niche for himself as the thinking believer and village explainer of those hard to fathom people for the readers of the Times, the New Yorker, and similar publications. (He had a first-rate take on Pope Leo’s papacy up on the latter’s website within a day of the new pontiff’s ascent.) The Life You Save May Be Your Own, Elie’s group biography of four prominent midcentury Catholic writers and intellectuals (Flannery O’Connor, Dorothy Day, Walker Percy, and Thomas Merton), is one of the best achieved examples of a tricky genre. He manages to make the fact of his faith very clear while remaining uninsistent about it—unlike, say, the profoundly annoying Ross Douthat, who can’t and won’t shut up about his conversion to Catholicism (as strongly as many of us wish he would). As a critic and historian Elie has clarity, depth, and range—qualities that serve him well as he navigates the stormy and turbid high/low waters of his chosen decade’s cultural output.

Elie is an unusual figure in the secular publications and the lists of the publishers he writes for because he takes religion and its manifestations as primary—not simply as an area of culture (film, music, lifestyle, and so on) treated as just another subject for investigation.

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

What’s Behind a Michelin Star?

Tulasi Srinivas in Sapiens:

Could a Philly Cheesesteak joint actually get a Michelin star?

The Michelin Red Guide is coming to Philadelphia, and inspectors are already scouting local restaurants to award the famed Michelin star. Michelin says the selected restaurants will be announced in a Northeast Cities edition celebration later this year. Boston will also be included for the first time.

As an anthropologist of ethics and religion who has an expertise in food studies, I read the announcement with some curiosity and a lot of questions. I had seen this small red guide revered by chefs and gourmands alike around the globe.

How did the Michelin guide begin reviewing restaurants? And what makes it an authority on cuisine worldwide?

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Barbara McClintock: “What does a cell know of itself?”

Claire L. Evans in Quanta:

In a provocative study published in Nature Communications late last year, the neuroscientist Nikolay Kukushkin and his mentor Thomas J. Carew at New York University showed that human kidney cells growing in a dish can “remember” patterns of chemical signals(opens a new tab) when they’re presented at regularly spaced intervals — a memory phenomenon common to all animals, but unseen outside the nervous system until now. Kukushkin is part of a small but enthusiastic cohort of researchers studying “aneural,” or brainless, forms of memory. What does a cell know of itself? So far, their research suggests that the answer to McClintock’s question might be: much more than you think.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

The Second Amendment and the use and misuse of history

Dan Gardner at Past Present Future:

The NRA was founded in 1871. For most of its long history, it was an apolitical organization of sportsmen that promoted marksmanship and safety training so duck hunters wouldn’t shoot themselves in the toes. In the Eisenhower era, the NRA’s motto, emblazoned over its front door was “Firearms Safety Education, Marksmanship Training, Shooting for Recreation.”

But in 1977, a group of far-right activists led a coup, took over the organization, and changed the motto to: “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Notice the stuff about Militias was omitted. The activists weren’t simply looking for something a little snappier. That omission was central to their audacious goal.

What followed that takeover was a deliberate, calculated, and wildly successful campaign to falsify popular perceptions of American history and change American constitutional law. It culminated in 2008, when the Supreme Court — for the first time in US history, please note — declared that the Second Amendment protected an individual’s right to own guns. It’s hard to overstate how radical that decision was. Until 2008 — a mere 17 years ago! — the Second Amendment did not protect an individual’s right to own guns.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

The Origin of Language – the surprising history of speech

Laura Spinney in The Guardian:

The story of human evolution has undergone a distinct feminisation in recent decades. Or, rather, an equalisation: a much-needed rebalancing after 150 years during which, we were told, everything was driven by males strutting, brawling and shagging, with females just along for the ride. This reckoning has finally arrived at language. The origins of our species’ exceptional communication skills constitutes one of the more nebulous zones of the larger evolutionary narrative, because many of the bits of the human anatomy that allow us to communicate – notably the brain and the vocal tract – are soft and don’t fossilise. The linguistic societies of Paris and London even banned talk of evolution around 1870, and the subject only made a timid comeback about a century later. Plenty of theories have been tossed into the evidentiary void since then, mainly by men, but now evolutionary biologist Madeleine Beekman, of the University of Sydney, has turned her female gaze on the problem.

Her theory, which she describes as having been hiding in plain sight, is compelling: language evolved in parallel with caring for our “underbaked” newborns, because looking after a creature as helpless as a human baby on the danger-filled plains of Africa required more than one pair of hands (and feet). It needed a group among whom the tasks of food-gathering, childcare and defence could be divided. A group means social life, which means communication.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Meta’s Smart Wristband Can Control Devices Like Tom Cruise in ‘Minority Report’

Shelly Fan in Singularity Hub:

In an iconic scene in the cyberpunk classic Minority Report, the protagonist dons specialized gloves and uses a variety of hand gestures to display and manipulate different tabs on a wall-sized screen—without ever physically touching it. Now the film’s sci-fi technology is coming to the real world. This week, Meta revealed a wristband that decodes finger movements using electrical signals in the wrist. The movements are familiar to anyone with a smartphone: Pinching, swiping, tapping, and even writing. An onboard computer translates these signals into commands on a laptop screen. Without training or calibration, users tackled a range of tests, like moving a cursor to a target, playing a Pacman-like game, and writing words and phrases—“hello world”—by drawing their index fingers across a tabletop.

Meta has long teased a muscle-reading wristband, with an early version that could translate computer clicks. The new device has broader capability. Powered by neural networks and trained on data from over 6,000 volunteers, the wristband achieved up to 90 percent accuracy in some tests. On average, participants could write roughly 21 words per minute, and they improved as they became more familiar with the device.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Tuesday Poem

Nowhere to Go and Going

The feet of the young girl running over the grass
in the neighborhood park touch the earth lightly, lightly.
Her young mother, heavy with her next child, looks
at her smiling, and I smile as I walk past in the early
evening of a late August. The girl has hardly rump
enough to give her shorts purchase. Her mother’s breasts,
full and round with the coming of milk, overflow
their halter. She sighs as the daughter skips to the fountain,
sips, then scurries back with one, two, three cartwheels
hurling herself down in a heap of ankles, knees, elbows
by her mother’s side. I am some place beneath thinking,
a walker and a watcher, drifting in the late summer
no where to go and going

by Nils Peterson
from His Notebooks

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Monday, August 11, 2025

The thought experiments that test your life, not your logic

Shai Tubali at Big Think:

Alone figure stands at the edge of the Universe and hurls a spear into the unknown, only to find the edge wasn’t an edge after all. A demon tells a chronically ill person that every moment of their life — every high, every hardship — will repeat forever, exactly as it is. A 16-year-old boy tries to travel alongside a beam of light, hoping to catch up, but no matter how fast he goes, it never slows. Someone is offered the chance to live in a simulated paradise, but there’s a catch: Once inside, they’ll forget it isn’t real. And a human falls in love with a consciousness that has no body, no boundaries, and no need for them.

All five scenarios are drawn from what is classically termed thought experiments. They range from Lucretius’ spear flung at the edge of the Universe — one of the earliest on record (1st century BCE) — to the vision of eternal recurrence that gripped the chronically ill Nietzsche. From Einstein’s boyhood attempt to chase a beam of light, to Robert Nozick’s 1974 Experience Machine. And even to a sci-fi film: Spike Jonze’s Her, a tale of futile, aching love between a man and a bodiless mind.

The essential practice of a thought experiment is deceptively simple: picture a situation in the imagination, let it run its course — or intervene in some way — then watch what happens and draw a conclusion.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

scientists have created bacteria that make proteins in a radically different way than all natural species do

Carl Zimmer in the New York Times:

At the heart of all life is a code. Our cells use it to turn the information in our DNA into proteins. So do maple trees. So do hammerhead sharks. So do shiitake mushrooms. Except for some minor variations, the genetic code is universal.

It’s also redundant. DNA can code for the same building block of proteins in more than one way. Researchers have long debated what purpose this redundancy serves — or whether it’s just an accident of history.

Thanks to advances in genetic engineering, they can now do more than just argue. Over the past decade, scientists have built microbes with smaller codes that lack some of that redundancy. A new study, published Thursday in the journal Science, describes a microbe with the most streamlined genetic code yet.

Remarkably, the engineered bacteria can run on an abridged code, making it clear that a full genetic code isn’t required for life.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Our Man for Tehran

Alex Shams in the Boston Review:

While Netanyahu and Trump bombed Iran, dozens of prominent Iranian Americans waved Israel’s flag and pled for harder strikes. Among those welcoming the attacks was sixty-four-year-old Reza Pahlavi, son of the king (shah, in Persian) whom Iranians overthrew in the revolution of 1979. “This is our Berlin Wall moment,” he declared.

Pahlavi has neither accomplishments nor grassroots popularity to draw on, but he does have a famous name and immense family wealth. In early 2023, he tried to build a coalition with opposition Iranians outside the country, but it promptly collapsed. Nonetheless, Pahlavi is fond of pretending that his “restoration” to the crown is a fait accompli. He spent the twelve-day war in June insisting that the Islamic Republic was on its last legs and that he would return to Tehran on the back of U.S. tanks and Israeli missiles, going so far as to boast of plans for his first hundred days in office.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

The Secret In Surfing

M M Owen at Aeon Magazine:

The first time I ever caught an unbroken wave was one of the greatest moments of my life. The memory is crystalline, perfect: the glistening aquamarine curl extending away from me, the massive sky above; my orange foam board under the soles of my feet, and a feeling of sliding, slicing downward – feet like knives in those precious impossible seconds before the wave begins to break. The dismount was not elegant. Astonished at what I had just seen, where I had just been, I yelped and slapped the water. A couple of dog-walkers eyed me from the shore. Many hours of spluttering, messy effort to suddenly be so effortlessly, elegantly in tune with the shape of a wave. All the surfing I do from here on out will partly be in pursuit of this original sensation.

My ex-wife was a brilliant woman, decisive in a way I’m often not. I’d seen her ruthlessly cut old friends out of her life, old habits, old patterns. I never expected to be on the receiving end but, all of a sudden, on a winter evening in a cocktail bar in downtown Lisbon, there I was. What I thought was a crisis meeting was in fact a farewell.

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

“Naulakhi Kothi” by Ali Akbar Natiq

Soni Wadhwa in Asian Review of Books:

South Asian fiction based on the Partition of 1947 is generally concerned with specific incidents of trauma and violence. Urdu writer Ali Akbar Natiq’s Naulakhi Kothi, recently translated into English by Naima Rashid, adds a different dimension to the existing ways of narrating fiction. Its story begins several years before the partition and ends several years later, thereby using partition to frame a much longer narrative. 

The novel has three interrelated stories. One concerns William, an heir to the eponymous Naulakhi Kothi near Jalalabad in today’s Punjab Pakistan, the mansion that cost the veritable fortune of nine lakhs, as the Hindi/Urdu “naulakha” has it, to make. It was a house built by his father: William grew up here, before being sent to England for an education. The plot opens with his memories as he returns “home”; he expects to be transferred to the district where his mansion is located. But as he gets closer to his home, he realizes things have changed. Politically motivated killings keep making things worse for the colonial administration (and thereby for him), and constitute the second story or subplot: the animosity between Ghulam Haider and Saudha Singh, the factions that keep fighting over control of land in the region. The third strand is the story of the cleric Maulvi Karamat (and subsequently his son and grandson), narrating the story of rags-to-power in what later becomes Pakistan.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.