Churchill and the Crown

Piers Brendon at Literary Review:

As Clementine Churchill famously remarked, her husband was the last surviving believer in the divine right of kings.

Yet his position was not that simple, as Ted Powell demonstrates in this scholarly book. Churchill’s own family, beside which the Windsors were parvenus, had quasi-regal pretensions. He himself was born in a palace, the great honey-coloured monument to the victory which his ancestor the first Duke of Marlborough had won at Blenheim. Churchill hero-worshipped Marlborough, trying to justify the traitorous part he played in ousting James II from the throne and claiming with characteristic hyperbole that Anne was ‘a great Queen championed by a great Constable’. And in his hagiography of his father, Lord Randolph Churchill, Winston omitted to mention that, in defence of his family’s honour (during a complicated case of double adultery), Randolph had threatened to publish the Prince of Wales’s love letters, declaring, ‘I have the Crown of England in my pocket.’ On Edward’s becoming king in 1901, Winston wrote to his mother in less than awed tones, ‘Will he sell his horses and scatter his Jews … Will he become desperately serious … Will the Keppel [his last mistress] be appointed 1st Lady of the Bedchamber?’

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Sunday, May 10, 2026

Nostalgic Summons

Raymond Geuss in Sidecar:

Adrian Wooldridge’s recent Centrists of the World Unite!: The Lost Genius of Liberalism does not just echo The Communist Manifesto in its language, it also mirrors its basic structure. Marx and Engels’s exhortation to workers around the world was not a free-standing bit of normative admonishment, but appealed to a theoretically informed historical argument about the role which class conflict has played in creating modern (i.e., mid-19th-century Western European) society, the form that class conflict now takes (capitalists versus proletariat) and the possibility of making society freer and more productive by fully socializing production. Much of Wooldridge’s book is likewise devoted to a historical account enlisted to support his thesis that liberalism created the modern world, but that it is now under threat. Rather than, as in the Communist Manifesto, calling on workers (‘Proletarians of all countries, unite!’) to create something new, open-ended and unpredictable, Wooldridge issues a nostalgic summons to ‘centrists’ to rally around the liberalism which made the modern world such a wonderful place to live in.

Wooldridge, for many years a writer at the Economist, is well aware that ‘liberalism’ is a historically changing constellation of views, and has been, at various points, a very broad church indeed. But he nonetheless thinks it possible to discern a core of ‘eternal liberal values’; the historical variation, he thinks, is a question of shifting additions to this central stock of beliefs. He has two slightly different ways of specifying what this core is. Sometimes it is said to be the notion that ‘the individual must be cherished: his or her rights must be protected and autonomy preserved’. This general claim, of course, is almost completely vacuous until one specifies which particular rights need to be defended; there isn’t anything like a universal consensus on that.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Power without Ideology

Daniel Bessner in The Ideas Letter:

The Donald J. Trump Administration’s war against Iran has renewed talk about the role the United States should play in the world. While in recent American history, public support for US wars has been relatively high in the first days of a conflict, only 41 percent of Americans supported the Iran War when it began, and these numbers have remained low. This lack of support is evidence of a broad shift in US public opinion away from kneejerk support for hegemony: Americans, it seems, have become skeptical of their empire.

As often occurs, public opinion has tracked material reality. The statistics tell a clear story: US economic and military power is in decline. In 1980, the United States represented 21.6 percent of global GDP adjusted for purchasing power parity (PPP); by 2016, that number had dropped to 15.9 percent; by 2025, it dropped to 14.6 percent; and it is projected to drop to 13.9 percent by 2030. The same is true when one examines the G7’s share of global GDP adjusted for PPP. In 1980, the G7 countries—the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, and Japan—represented 51.9 percent of global GDP adjusted for PPP; in 2016, 32.3 percent; in 2025, 28.3 percent; and this share is expected to drop to 26.2 percent by 2030. Over the past two decades, several countries in Asia have arisen to challenge North Atlantic economic power. In 1980, China represented only 2.1 percent of global GDP adjusted for PPP; in 2025, 19.6 percent; and is expected to grow to 20.4 percent by 2030. For its part, India grew from representing 2.7 percent of global GDP adjusted for PPP in 1980, to 8.2 percent in 2025, to a projected 9.7 percent in 2030. In both absolute and relative terms, the United States and its closest allies have experienced significant economic decline.

The same is true of US military power.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

From Sea to Saffron Sea

Samanth Subramanian interviews Neelanjan Sircar in Equator:

Let’s start with the big result: West Bengal, where the BJP won 206 out of 294 assembly seats. How significant is that margin?

By vote share, we’re picking up a 5% difference between the two parties – which is not small, but it’s not massive either. The mandate in terms of seats is massive, however. And the reason is that the BJP did well, consistently, even if a constituency had a moderate percentage of Muslims.

Which was unexpected. How did that happen?

The BJP has been the major opposition party in West Bengal since 2019, but it has never had a large operation in the state: no cadre of organised, Bengali-speaking party workers on the ground. In the cities, social media and other factors somewhat made up for that lack. But if you travelled to rural areas, the BJP’s presence would disappear. And they had another challenge: how to swing the electoral arithmetic in their favour in a state that is 27% Muslim. So for these reasons, for several months heading into the election, the TMC looked to be a little bit ahead, despite a wave of anti-incumbency.

Around the country, though, and particularly in West Bengal, the BJP has used the Modi government’s machinery – investigative agencies, the paramilitary, the Election Commission – to show its presence, to demonstrate power. Even in Assam, for instance, the Election Commission may well have gerrymandered in favour of the BJP on a scale that we’ve never seen in India.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

The Wrong Kind of Black Poet

Ernest Jesuyemi in Compact:

Poetry is the expression of an eloquent, enlightened, and enlightening subjectivity. Every subjectivity is bedevilled with prejudices, good and bad. Sometimes it happens that the unhealthy prejudices are sophisticated and have tenacious roots (one thinks of T. S. Eliot’s antisemitism), sometimes they are cheap and irritating (Ezra Pound’s). Neither is a legitimate reason to excommunicate a poet or his work.

An ability to hold divergent emotions, to respond in a way that reflects that you have apprehended all the shades of the matter—this is what poetry makes possible. Anthony Hecht, who wrote one of the most disturbing poems in commemoration of the Holocaust (“More Light! More Light!”), who was haunted all his life by that grave atrocity, and was sensitive to and indelibly marked by antisemitism, could still have the grace to love and profit from Eliot—and from Pound. He did not separate the art from the artist; that is impossible. He took the art as it is, because good art does not become any less valuable because it contains (what are to us) troubling sentiments.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Sunday Poem

Love After Love

The time will come
when, with elation,
you will greet yourself arriving
at your own door, in your own mirror,
and each will smile at the other’s welcome,

and say, sit here. Eat.
You will love again the stranger who was your self.
Give wine. Give bread. Give back your heart
to itself, to the stranger who has loved you

all your life, who you ignored
for another, who knows you by heart.
Take down the love letters from the bookshelf,

the photographs, the desperate notes,
peel your own image from the mirror.
Sit. Feast on your life.

by Derek Walcott
Collected Poems
1948-1984

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

What Would a Feminist Justice System Look Like?

Rachel Snyder in The New York Times:

The avenues that lead women to jail tend to differ from those for men. Criminologists have long understood this. What happens with women is often a layering of trauma and abuse. They might have economic instability or mental health challenges that allow them to be exploited by violent partners. They might exchange sex for food or housing, and then get arrested for any number of infractions: prostitution, trespassing, drugs. The criminal-justice researcher Stephanie Kennedy calls these “crimes of survival.”

These avenues have contributed to shocking rates of incarceration for women: Between 1978 and 2015, the number of women in state prisons has grown by 834 percent. The overwhelming majority are primary caregivers. When a woman goes to prison, the downstream effects can be staggering: children might enter foster care, itself often a traumatic system. Aging parents might be put into subpar facilities, or have to find alternative care and housing. All too often, the cost of such upheaval results in a cycle of crime, incarceration, addiction, poverty and broken families.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Friday, May 8, 2026

Zen and the Art of Persuasive Writing

David Weinzweig at X:

I’m an appellate court judge. I’ve read thousands of briefs. Here’s what no one told you about persuasion and how to win.

Judges check page length before reading a word.

Long brief? We read faster and with less attention.
Short brief? We slow down and pay closer attention.

Brevity signals confidence. Most lawyers have it backwards.

Adverbs sometimes destroy the arguments they’re meant to strengthen and protect. I call them badverbs.

1. Intensifier adverbs: Used to pump up weak arguments (“Clearly,” “Obviously,” “Outrageously”).
2. Hedge adverbs: Used to cushion shaky arguments (“Arguably,” “Apparently,” “Fairly strongly”).

Researchers studied U.S. Supreme Court briefs and found something striking: the more intensifiers a brief used, the more often the party lost.

More hereZen and the Art of Persuasive Writing book, here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Photographic memory is a myth

Gabrielle Principe at The Conversation:

Most recently, it appeared in the television series “The Pitt,” set in a hospital emergency department. When the digital patient board suddenly went offline, medical student Joy Kwon saved the day by effortlessly reciting from memory every lost detail – names, rooms, doctors, conditions, vitals. It’s a gripping moment. The stakes are high, recall is perfect, and the implication is clear: Some people have minds that function like high-resolution cameras.

The idea of photographic memory is simple and powerful: Experience is captured objectively, stored completely and retrieved perfectly. See it once, keep it forever.

There’s just one problem. There’s no scientific evidence it exists.

As a memory researcher, I understand that belief in photographic memory is common and the idea is compelling. But it is simply wrong.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Why do manure spreaders have life cycles?

Dan Bouk at Asterisk:

Flipping through the rest of the book, I learned that pumps in water works have an “average life” of 21.3 years compared to only 5.3 years for telephone switchboards. The life of an electric lamp is better expressed in hours (around a 1,000) than years. A railroad tie made from Douglas fir lives a couple more years, on average, than one made white oak and a manure spreader outlives an automobile by more than three years.

Norm had spent a career with these sorts of facts. But I found them a bit odd. I mean, do telephone switchboards have life spans? They were never alive to begin with. So why had this metaphor taken root? What did it mean to an engineer like Norm and to those who came before him?

This first installment in a two-part essay shows how the engineers used the life span as a tool for facing the inevitable problem of mechanical decay. The second part reveals how the metaphor boomeranged, how it transformed into a tool for managing the engineers themselves.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

One Benefit of Aging? You’ll Have Fewer Regrets

Jeffrey Kluger in Time Magazine:

Few emotions are as nagging as regret—the mourning and melancholy that comes from fearing you picked the wrong mate, pursued the wrong career, or ended a marriage that you maybe could have saved. Over the course of a lifetime, there are a lot of such hinge points. It would seem to follow that the longer you live, the more regrets you’ll have. But a new study published in the journal Emotion finds that the opposite is actually true: older people have fewer regrets than younger people—and handle them better when they do.

“In general, older people seem to pull back more and not to think as much about the regrets or what they should do about them,” says lead author Julia Nolte, assistant professor in the department of psychology at Tilburg University in the Netherlands. “We were interested in this difference in the psychological aging process and what it does to us [over] time.”

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

An AI Just Beat Doctors at Diagnosing ER Patients

Shelly Fan in Singularity Hub:

Emergency doctors make high-stakes decisions in fast-paced, often chaotic situations. They have to figure out which patient most urgently needs care, what’s wrong, and what to do next. AI could lend a hand. In a series of challenging scenarios, OpenAI’s o1-preview model matched or exceeded doctors in clinical reasoning. Debuted in 2024, the AI is a large language model similar to those powering ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and other popular chatbots. But when it was first developed, o1-preview differed in its ability to “think” through problems before answering. Such reasoning models explore multiple strategies, check themselves, and revise answers before offering a conclusion. This is a little closer to how humans solve problems. Given case reports from an established database, o1-preview diagnosed the problem nearly 89 percent of the time. In real-world emergency room scenarios, the AI outperformed physicians at the triage stage, where doctors decide which patient needs treatment first.

…This doesn’t mean that o1-preview is ready for the clinic or is about to replace physicians. Instead of a human-versus-machine spectacle, the study was more focused on setting a higher bar for systems designed to work alongside people. Like everyone else, doctors are incorporating AI into their work. Whether that improves or hinders care is an open question.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Friday Poem

The Meaning of the Creative Act

True creativity is of spiritual and existential freedom.
Creativeness is the overcoming of the world,
not an adaptation to the necessities of the world.
Creativeness is transition beyond the limits of this world,
an overcoming of its necessity.”

Creativity is inexplicable and mysterious,
a creation
out of nothing,
an undetermined, addition to the
existing energy of the world.

Enslavement and bondage of the
world’s hierarchy of beings

submit man to lower,
moribund levels of being;
they compel man
by their
material heaviness. This bondage,
this heaviness
of the lower hierarchy
conceal from us the
creative secret of being.

We see the world in an aspect of necessity,
of moribund and petrified materialization.
But is creativeness possible for necessity,
and out of necessity?

We’ve already seen that in the realm of necessity
only evolution is possible—the rearrangement of
a given quantity of energy.

Only freedom can create absolute
increase in the world,
only the free man creates.

The determinism which is so compulsively
forced upon us is false because
freedom
of personality does exist, and  breaks

the chains of necessity.

by Nicolas Berdyaev
From Poetic Outlaws 

 

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Thursday, May 7, 2026

Maladaptive frugality

Herbert Lui at his own blog:

I recently decided to, finally, have my iPhone fixed, only to realize a few hours later that my AppleCare could have covered it. I was in a low mood until my partner suggested that I was robbing myself of a good decision.

The iPhone needed fixing, and procrastinating on it wasn’t useful. Deciding to do something about it was. Paying a little more wasn’t a big deal, especially compared to the business opportunities in front of me. I realized I could either continue to drain myself for a small expense, or let it go and focus on the projects in front of me. I had, unknowingly, engaged in maladaptive frugality.

For me, it started from a young age, during which frugality was framed as a virtue and mindless spending as, practically, sinful.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Bees are smarter than we ever imagined

Hannah Nordhaus in National Geographic:

Over the past few decades, scientists have been learning more and more about the ways that bees figure things out. They’ve studied how honeybee foragers fan out across miles of unfamiliar terrain in their six-week adult lifespan, navigating by sunlight and memory as they visit thousands of flowers to retrieve nectar for their colonies. They’ve followed bees back to their nests and seen how they dance to tell others where the best flowers are, and how they make collective decisions to swarm and relocate their homes.

Now researchers are uncovering remarkable new insights into how these industrious insects think. The breakthroughs have arrived thanks to a series of creative experiments designed to test how bees perceive the world, solve problems, and respond to unexpected situations. And the results have found that a single bee is much smarter than almost anyone imagined. These tiny creatures can make the sort of intelligent decisions that scientists previously believed were possible only in vertebrates.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.