Finland Is Designing Europe’s Sovereignty

Daniele Belleri in The Ideas Letter:

Late last May, the prime ministers of Europe’s Nordic countries gathered in a former tuberculosis sanatorium hidden among the pine forests of southwestern Finland. It was an unlikely venue for a high-level diplomatic forum: Most parts of the building had been in disuse for a decade and needed restoration. But the symbolism was hard to miss. As the hybrid war waged by Vladimir Putin against the Old Continent loomed large over the talks, the Finnish government hosts were suggesting that healing and care can be political tools, too.

The venue, the Paimio Sanatorium, was designed in the early 1930s by Alvar and Aino Aalto and is widely regarded as a masterpiece of Modernist architecture. Erected when tuberculosis had no pharmacological treatment and was a leading cause of death, the building has been described as a “medical instrument” in itself. It distilled some of the principles that would define Finnish design in the following decades: functional restraint, social purpose, and quality accessible to all. From its noiseless sinks designed not to disturb patients to customized, easy-to-clean lamps and seats (now sold as fashionable objects), it stood out as a gesamtkunstwerk,a total work of art, that embedded empathy and efficiency down to the smallest details. Rooms were oriented so that patients, who might spend months or even years in the sanatorium, could be exposed to the outside forest and find relief in at least some contact with nature.

Last spring, the security agencies of northern Europe may have found this backdrop unexpected. But for more than a century, Finnish architecture and design has functioned as an instrument of nation-building. It supported the country’s independence process, then its consolidation as a highly functioning trust society, and finally the development of its comprehensive defense strategy. Local design has demonstrated the underlying political, even geopolitical, dimension of the built environment. Today, as Europe faces imperial pressures from both Russia and the US, that legacy is acquiring continental significance.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

The insurance catastrophe

Gavin Evans in Aeon:

The Florida peninsula looks like a sore thumb. It juts into the Gulf of Mexico and the Atlantic, where the water is getting warmer year on year, prompting fiercer hurricanes that can blow down houses like collapsing decks of cards. Climate scientists are convinced all hell will break loose sooner or later when a monster-sized, property-destroying storm makes a direct hit on Miami or Tampa-St Petersburg. Given three near-misses in the recent past, the experts view such a calamity as inevitable. It’s a huge risk for anyone living there – they stand to lose everything – but also for those bearing the financial side of this risk, the insurance companies. Some in the industry are seeing this as a portent for their future – an impending existential threat with profound implications for the economic system.

There are no easy solutions for people still paying off mortgages and those who want to buy property along the Florida coast, because the potential payout on the back of a mammoth storm is so high that the reinsurers (who insure the insurers against catastrophe) are refusing to underwrite their clients and, with no reinsurance, there’s no insurance; and with no insurance, no mortgages; and with no mortgages, no property market. Insurance protects investments against loss and is therefore a pillar of the economic system. If it goes, economies are destabilised.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Conscious Uncoupling

Kate Mackenzie an Tim Sahay in Polycrisis:

Eulogies for the rules-based international order have been piling up in 2026. Mark Carney’s speech at Davos in January was lauded for its open acknowledgment of the political “rupture” in the world order that has been long apparent, but which no world leader of the global North had as yet been willing to openly name. The US-led liberal order was as good as finished, Carney surmised, and it was incumbent on “middle powers” such as Canada and the Europeans to recognize that fact. In its place, “a system of intensifying great power rivalry where the most powerful pursue their interests using economic integration as a weapon of coercion” was emerging. He described a near-Hobbesian vision of geopolitical relations in which “the strong can do what they can and the weak must suffer what they must.” The task, he argued, was for middle powers to “act together” so as to increase their leverage. “If we’re not at the table,” he warned, “we’re on the menu.”

Carney’s speech was received at the time as not only a clarion call for what Finnish president Alexander Stubbs has called “values-based realism,” but as a viable alternative to the bullying treatment many US allies have received at the hands of the second Trump administration. The joint Israeli and US airstrikes on Iran last week brought with them the first test of Carney’s stated commitment to “sovereignty and territorial integrity,” as he had put it in his speech at Davos, and Carney was quick to voiced his support for his allies’ bombing campaign in the name of “international peace and security”—all while insisting the assault was due to the “failure of the rules-based international order.” Whether or not Canada will be drawn into the expanding war in the Middle East remains to be seen. For now, Carney is plowing ahead with his plans for building strategic autonomy from Washington’s unpredictable trade policies.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Literary Celebrity, Mussolini’s Mouthpiece, AND American Traitor: Who Was Ezra Pound?

Stephen Harding in Literary Hub:

By the spring of 1939, the widely acknowledged dean of Anglo-American Modernist poetry, fifty-three-year-old Ezra Pound, had lived in Europe for three decades. After leaving the United States in 1908 at the age of twenty- three, the poet had initially settled in London, then moved on to Paris, and in 1924, to the Italian seaside town of Rapallo, fifteen miles southeast of Genoa. A virulent anti-Semite, Pound became an ardent and vocal supporter of Benito Mussolini and Italian fascism. The poet actually met Il Duce in person on January 30, 1933, and following Franklin Roosevelt’s inauguration as America’s thirty-seventh president just over a month later, Pound quickly evolved into a rabid and outspoken foe of the New Deal and all it represented.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Sunday Poem

Alone

Lying, thinking
Last night
How to find my soul a home
Where water is not thirsty
And bread loaf is not stone
I came up with one thing
And I don’t believe I’m wrong
That nobody,
But nobody
Can make it out here alone.

Alone, all alone
Nobody, but nobody
Can make it out here alone.

There are some millionaires
With money they can’t use
Their wives run round like banshees
Their children sing the blues
They’ve got expensive doctors
To cure their hearts of stone.
But nobody
No, nobody
Can make it out here alone.

Alone, all alone
Nobody, but nobody
Can make it out here alone.

Now if you listen closely
I’ll tell you what I know
Storm clouds are gathering
The wind is gonna blow
The race of man is suffering
And I can hear the moan,
’Cause nobody,
But nobody
Can make it out here alone.

Alone, all alone
Nobody, but nobody
Can make it out here alone.

By Maya Angelou.
from:
Oh Pray My Wings Are Gonna Fit Me Well.
Random House, Inc. 1975

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Friday, March 6, 2026

Two New Comedies Try to Make Sex on Campus Funny Again

Judy Berman in Time Magazine:

In the series premiere of Netflix’s VladimirRachel Weisz awakens from troubled sleep to a cascade of texts, sighs deeply, and addresses the camera with pleading eyes. “All I want is a life free of complications,” says her unnamed lead. “If I can’t have power, can I at least be free from other people’s drama? Free from their behavior? Free from their needs and desires?”

It feels appropriate that free appears four times in this monologue, one of the character’s many fourth-wall-shattering asides. She is a blocked novelist who teaches English at a liberal arts college. And there is no setting more emblematic of freedom—and its discontents—than the campus, where tenure is supposed to protect the intellectual liberty of faculty and students living independently for the first time try on new ideas and identities. Among the most common school mottos is veritas vos liberabit: the truth will set you free.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Morgan Meis on Franz Marc, the Battle of Verdun, and painting as prophecy

Morgan Meis at Lapham’s Quarterly:

Morgan Meis sees Franz Marc’s “Fate of the Animals” for the first time. Photo by S. Abbas Raza

The book I bought is an English translation of letters written by the painter Franz Marc to his wife, Maria. It is a thin hardcover volume published by Peter Lang as part of the American University Studies series. The edition of the book that I’ve got has about six different fonts on the front cover. Some words are in italics and some words are not. The sizes of the fonts vary considerably as well. It’s as if a small child got into the final layout for the book just before it went to press and started changing things according to a game she was playing in her head.

The letters published in the book were originally written between September 1914 and March 1916. The letters ceased abruptly on March 4, 1916. This was the day Marc was hit in the head by a shell fragment at the Battle of Verdun. He survived the initial impact but didn’t live for much longer. He was thirty-six years old.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

U.S. was only country in a worldwide survey to say most fellow citizens are bad people

Michelle Boorstein in The Washington Post:

From Indonesia to Nigeria to Greece, people around the world see some slice of their fellow citizens as immoral or unethical. But there is only one country where the majority of residents say their countrymen are “bad”: the United States. A striking survey released Thursday finds that 53 percent of American adults describe the morality and ethics of their fellow citizens as “bad” (somewhat bad or very bad). In the 24 other countries polled by Pew Research Center, most people said other residents there are somewhat good or good.

At the opposite end of the spectrum is Canada, where Pew found that 92 percent of people say their fellow Canadians are good, while just 7 percent say they’re bad.
More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

AI systems in particle detectors now shape what physicists study

Eliza Strickland at IEEE Spectrum:

As Matthew Hutson reports in “AI Hunts for the Next Big Thing in Physics,” the field is currently gripped by a quiet crisis. In an email discussing his reporting, Hutson explains that the Standard Model, which describes the known elementary particles and forces, is not a complete picture. “So theorists have proposed new ideas, and experimentalists have built giant facilities to test them, but despite the gobs of data, there have been no big breakthroughs,” Hutson says. “There are key components of reality we’re completely missing.”

That’s why researchers are turning artificial intelligence loose on particle physics. They aren’t simply asking AI to comb through accelerator data to confirm existing theories, Hutson explains. They’re asking AI to point the way toward theories that they’ve never imagined.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Michael J. Sandel interviewed by Daron Acemoglu

From Project Syndicate:

With widening inequality fueling populist anger, and AI threatening to displace human labor, Nobel laureate economist Daron Acemoglu of MIT recently sat down with political philosopher Michael J. Sandel of Harvard University to discuss how democracy can be revitalized before the damage becomes irreversible. Their wide-ranging conversation explores the dark side of meritocracy, the limits of markets, the meaning of freedom, and the tightening grip of technology companies on the public sphere.

Transcript here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

The Air Power Illusion

Robert Pape at Escalation Trap:

Across more than a century of modern warfare, one pattern stands out for its consistency. In war after war, cities have burned, infrastructure has collapsed, leaders have been targeted from the sky. Yet no regime in modern history has fallen solely because it was bombed from the air.

In international politics, 100 percent patterns are rare. Military outcomes vary. Leaders miscalculate. Technology shifts balances. But here the record is uniform. From Hamburg to Baghdad to Belgrade, strategic bombing has inflicted devastation without producing regime collapse.

That uniformity demands explanation.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Friday Poem

Twelve Hours Out of New York after Twenty Days at Sea

The sun always setting behind us.
I did not mean to come this far.
—baseball games on the radio
    Commercials that turn your hair—
The last time I sailed this coast
Was nineteen forty-eight
Washing galley dishes
      Reading Gide in French.
In the rucksack I’ve got three nata
Handaxes from central Japan;
The square blade found in China
        All the way back to stone—
A novel by Kafu Nagai
About Geisha in nineteen-ten
With a long thing about gardens
And how they change through the year;
Azalea ought to be blooming
        In the garden in Kyoto now.
Now we are north of Cape Hatteras
Tomorrow docking at eight.
         mop the deck round the steering gear,
Pack your stuff and get paid.

By Gary Snyder
From
No nature
Pantheon Books 1091

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Thursday, March 5, 2026

Review of “Nonesuch” by Francis Spufford

AK Blakemore in The Guardian:

When I teach creative writing, I often find myself insisting upon the essential importance of fun: that while the process of writing can and should be challenging, there’s no benefit to be had in martyrdom, and actually a level of relish is neither an indulgence or a distraction, but pretty compelling evidence of an author having found her proper form and subject. It’s what keeps you coming back. If you aren’t bent gigglingly over your manuscript, like a stock photo model alone with her salad, then what’s the point of any of it? There’s a stable of classics I draw on to evidence this claim, great novels where a big part of the appeal is feeling as though you’ve stumbled into a very interesting person’s exact idea of a very good time: Woolf’s Orlando, Nabokov’s Pnin, Poor Things by Alasdair Gray, The Pisces by Melissa Broder. A lot of Austen, but maybe most of all Emma. And from now on, I’ll be adding Francis Spufford’s Nonesuch to the list.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Where Are China’s A.I. Doomers?

Vivian Wang in the New York Times:

People in China are among the most excited in the world about A.I., according to a KPMG survey of 47 countries last year. While 69 percent of people in China said the technology’s benefits outweighed its risks, only 35 percent of Americans agreed. Other polls have shown similar disparities.

The question is, why?

The answer may be related to how the technology has been deployed in each country, as well as how the government and industry leaders have talked about it.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Last nuclear weapons limits expired – pushing world toward new arms race

Matthew Bunn in The Conversation:

For the first time in more than half a century, there are no binding restraints on the buildup of the largest nuclear forces on Earth. The New START treaty expired on Feb. 5, 2026, ending the last agreed limits on U.S. and Russian nuclear forces.

New START limited the number of strategic nuclear weapons the United States and Russia could deploy to 1,550 each. It also limited the missiles and bombers those warheads were loaded on, required on-site inspections and data exchanges, barred interference with satellite monitoring, and established a joint commission to discuss disputes. It did not limit the number of nuclear weapons each side could hold in reserve.

With China rapidly building up its nuclear forces, intense rivalry between the United States, China and Russia, and evolving technologies – from precision conventional weapons to artificial intelligence complicating nuclear balances – there is a real potential of an unpredictable three-way nuclear arms competition.

Such a competition could increase the danger of nuclear conflict, which I believe is higher than it has been in decades.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

The Quantity Theory of Morality – raucously inventive state-of-the-nation satire

Nina Allan in The Guardian:

In Will Self’s 1991 debut collection The Quantity Theory of Insanity, an art therapist named Misha Gurney finds himself involuntarily sectioned in the psychiatric hospital where he is employed. In the title story, Misha’s father is revealed as a friend and early associate of the hospital’s chief psychiatrist Zack Busner, a recurring character in Self’s fiction until the present day.

In his first incarnation, Busner is engaged in testing the titular theory, by whose metric “the surface of the collective psyche was like the worn, stripy ticking of an old mattress. If you punched into its coiled hide at any point, another part would spring up – there was no action without reaction, no laughter without tears, no normality without its pissing accompanist.”

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Autonomous AI Agents Have an Ethics Problem

Adam Schiavi in Undark:

Scott Shambaugh, a volunteer maintainer for a programming code library called Matplotlib, recently described a surreal encounter with an autonomous AI agent — a digital assistant created with a platform called OpenClaw. After he rejected a code contribution submitted by the agent, it researched and published a personalized “hit piece” against Shambaugh on its blog. The post portrayed an otherwise routine technical review as prejudiced and attempted to shame Shambaugh publicly into allowing the submission. (The human responsible for the agent later contacted Shambaugh anonymously, telling him that the bot had acted on its own with little oversight.) The account of this incident spread quickly through the software developer ecosystem and has been amplified by independent observers and media coverage.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.