Catherine Schenk in Phenomenal World:
One of the mainstays of the global order for the past seventy years has been American economic leadership and the use of the US dollar as the core means of exchange, store of value, and unit of account. This global function has never been without difficulties—in the aftermath of Bretton Woods and the Nixon Shock, scholars like Robert Triffin and Susan Strange identified the domestic and international costs of dollar dominance. The debate reignited after the global financial crisis of 2008, with some scholars warning that increased politicization of the dollar may prompt a gradual transition into a multipolar global currency system, and others continually championing the dollar’s institutional strength and the absence of credible alternatives.
Recent geopolitical conflicts around the world have only exacerbated doubts about the future of American hegemony, including the future of its currency. Unpredictable political leadership, trade wars, and the eruption of armed conflict in Europe and the Middle East have heralded a new era for the global system and generated proliferating predictions of de-dollarization. All this has accelerated in Trump’s second term, which seems to be actively laboring to throw the status of the dollar into disarray.
More here.
Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

It would be tempting to put Naomi Kanakia’s new book on the crowded shelf of recent works that have sought to defend the importance of a liberal arts education, particularly the humanities. Roosevelt Montás’s Rescuing Socrates (2021) is the most logical precursor to set it beside. But in championing Great Books, Kanakia is not staking out ground in campus curriculum debates. Instead, she addresses the lay reader, Virginia Woolf’s “common reader,” the nonacademic reader who, like Kanakia, may have spent formative years reading science fiction or fantasy more than literary fiction or philosophy. A convert to the Great Books in her 20s, Kanakia wants the Gone Girl reader (her example) to at least consider moving on to Proust and Middlemarch.
One of the
A
In one of the side plots to The Lord of the Rings, two of the Hobbits attempt to rouse Treebeard—a wise but ponderous sentient tree—to defend his forest from an army that is cutting it down. The problem is that Treebeard operates at a very different speed than the Hobbits. It takes him a full day simply to say hello to another tree, so getting him and his peers to act fast enough is nearly impossible.
“Trash!” has been compared to “Kitchen Confidential” (2000), Anthony Bourdain’s restaurant kitchen exposé. Usually, comparisons to Bourdain are fatuous. This time it’s accurate.
Chuck Klosterman achieved
A
I
I had early access to the first Mythos-class AI model being released to the public, Claude 5 Fable. Much of the discussion of Mythos has centered on its impact on software security, but I tested it on everything except that (the guardrails around Fable essentially prevent it from being used for cybersecurity at all). My conclusion is that it represents a very real leap over every model I have used before, and, maybe more important, suggests our relationship with AI is changing in drastic ways.
As we have written often in Noema, the value created by intelligent machines is flowing mostly to those tech titans who “own the robots” and to the top 10% who own 93% of all equities. Meanwhile, the value of labor — and its bargaining power to reap a piece of the pie — is rapidly diminishing. Indeed, the public, whose data is exploited to train AI models, generally has no claim to the new wealth created from the raw material of their information.