New Paradigms Won’t Save You

Scott Alexander at Astral Codex Ten:

One popular objection to AI concerns is to declare that LLMs can never be AGI. You need a “new paradigm”. Therefore, AGI is so far in the future that it’s not worth worrying about.

A common counterargument is to claim that no, LLMs can become AGI. But even without that counterargument, I think the “therefore” fails on its own terms. The key question is: how much of a new paradigm do we need?

The landmark discoveries on the road to modern LLMs are something like:

1950s: Neural networks
1967: Multi-layer perceptron
2010: Modern deep learning
2017: Transformer, LLM
2022: RLHF, chatbots
2024: Chain of thought / test-time compute

We can think of this as an “evolutionary tree”, where a given LLM (let’s say Claude Opus 4.7) shares a recent “common ancestor” with all other chatbots, and only a very distant “common ancestor” with everything else descended from the multi-layer perceptron. If AGI needs a “new paradigm”, what common ancestor can we expect AGI and LLMs to share?

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

AI Lab Partners Are Rewiring the Hunt for New Drugs

Shelly Fan in Singularity Hub:

Uncovering nature’s secrets is no easy task. The daily life of a scientist is often grueling, frustrating, and—perhaps surprisingly—boring as they repeat experiments over and over. Here’s where AI could lend a hand. This week, two studies offer a glimpse into a future where AI and scientists bounce ideas off each other and collaborate on projects to benefit humanity. Both systems rely on large language models in end-to-end scientific discovery. They read through existing literature, generate hypotheses, suggest relevant experiments, and analyze and interpret the data for scientists to evaluate. The researchers then give the AI feedback, and the cycle begins again.

One of the systems, called Robin, was instructed to find drugs for a common eye condition. Developed by FutureHouse, a non-profit that builds AI systems to automate research in biology and other scientific fields, Robin quickly homed in on candidates. According to the team, the AI slashed research time 200-fold compared to scientists working alone. The other system is Google DeepMind’s Co-Scientist. With human guidance, Co-Scientist found already approved drugs that could be repurposed for a type of leukemia within hours. It also surfaced promising targets for liver scarring.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Friday Poem

what is this fragrance?
is it from heaven?
whose laughter is this?
is it Houris in paradise?

what wedding is this
with moon for a platter
and heaven for a veil?

what banquet is this
that the Sultan of Bagdad
licks the platters
in our kitchen?

God alone knows!

but come! take a pick-axe
and break apart
your stony self

the heart’s matrix
is glutted by rubies

springs of laughter
are buried in your breast

unstop the wine-jar,
batter down the door
to the treasury
of non-existence

the water in your jug
is brackish and low

smash the jug
and come to the river!

by Jelaluddin Rumi
from Rumi – Fragment & Ecstasies
Translation by Daniel Liebert
Omega Publications, 1981

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

How Antihumanism Turned On Its Authors

Geoff Shullenberger at the Hedgehog Review:

The line of thinking pursued by Barthes goes back to Plato’s Phaedrus, where writing is understood—not unlike chatbots today—as a technological prosthesis separate from the human person that produces an alienated, threatening simulacrum of discourse. In this sense, writing already forced the questioning of human essence more recently attributed to AI text generation. This questioning was at the center of the major lines of poststructuralist thought. Jacques Derrida enlisted the subversive power of writing identified by Plato in his project of “grammatology,” which sought to decenter logos, presence, authenticity, and other hallmarks of the human. For his part, Michel Foucault followed up on Barthes’s polemic with his “What Is an Author?” which concludes by heralding “the stirring of an indifference: What difference does it make who is speaking?” This prophecy echoes Foucault’s earlier proclamation, in his 1966 book The Order of Things, that “man [will] be erased, like a face drawn in sand at the edge of the sea.”

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Is Mathematics Out There?

Steve Nadis at Aeon Magazine:

The equations that govern black holes were true before there were black holes. That claim is hotly contested, and cuts through one of the deepest fault lines in the philosophy of mathematics. On one side are those who hold that mathematical structures, including well-established principles and basic geometric shapes like the tetrahedron, exist independently of human thought – not as a language we invented to describe reality, but rather as the substrate of reality itself. On the other side of the debate are those who argue that mathematics is the product of human labours, imposed on a world that would be wholly indifferent to it were we not here.

Sergiu Klainerman, professor of mathematics at Princeton University in New Jersey, stands resolutely in the first camp, affirming that mathematical truth precedes us, and that our job is simply to unearth it. His work includes landmark proofs that empty space is stable and that black holes – collapsed stars so dense that nothing inside can escape their gravitational pull – do not disintegrate when perturbed. Theorems like this that he has proved, and others he has built upon, do not represent human creations, he says, but instead stand as discoveries.

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Thursday, May 21, 2026

Anthropic’s co-founder will speak at the Vatican launch of the pope’s AI encyclical

Alina Maria Stan at The Next Web:

Pope Leo XIV will personally present his first encyclical, Magnifica Humanitas, on 25 May at the Vatican’s Synod Hall, and one of the speakers alongside him will be Christopher Olah, co-founder of Anthropic. The Vatican announced the details on Monday, confirming that the document will address the protection of human dignity in the age of artificial intelligence and that the pope will break with tradition by presenting it himself rather than delegating the task to cardinals and press officials.

Olah leads Anthropic’s research on interpretability, the effort to understand how advanced AI models operate internally. His presence at the launch of a papal encyclical is unusual by any measure. Encyclicals are among the highest forms of papal teaching, directed at the Catholic Church’s 1.4 billion members, and their publication events are typically sober ecclesiastical affairs. Inviting the co-founder of one of the world’s leading AI companies to speak at one signals that Leo XIV intends Magnifica Humanitas to be received not only as a theological document but as a contribution to the active debate over how AI should be governed.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

An OpenAI model has disproved a central conjecture in discrete geometry

From OpenAI:

For nearly 80 years, mathematicians have studied a deceptively simple question: if you place n points in the plane, how many pairs of points can be exactly distance 1 apart?

This is the planar unit distance problem, first posed by Paul Erdős in 1946. It is one of the best-known questions in combinatorial geometry, easy to state and remarkably difficult to resolve. The 2005 book Research Problems in Discrete Geometry, by Brass, Moser, and Pach, calls it “possibly the best known (and simplest to explain) problem in combinatorial geometry.” Noga Alon, a leading combinatorialist at Princeton, describes it as “one of Erdős’ favorite problems.” Erdős even offered a monetary prize for resolving this problem.

Today, we share a breakthrough on the unit distance problem. Since Erdős’s original work, the prevailing belief has been that the “square grid” constructions depicted further below were essentially optimal for maximizing the number of unit-distance pairs. An internal OpenAI model has disproved this longstanding conjecture, providing an infinite family of examples that yield a polynomial improvement. The proof has been checked by a group of external mathematicians. They have also written a companion paper explaining the argument and providing further background and context for the significance of the result.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Boarding China’s Last Bus

Zilan Qian at Asterisk:

Americans  — left, right, and everywhere in between — seem to be afraid of AI. They fear data centers speeding up climate change, disinformation and deepfakes, AI companionship, and, above all, job loss from automation. Meanwhile, the Chinese public seems to be perfectly fine with the technology, or even “optimistic” about it.

The polling data is striking: Stanford University’s 2026 AI Index Report shows that more than 85% of Chinese respondents see AI as more beneficial than harmful, compared to less than 45% of respondents in the United States. A 2025 report published by the University of Queensland and KPMG Australia revealed that 73% of Chinese respondents are willing to trust AI system outputs and share relevant information with AI at work, and 88% intentionally use the technology, compared to 52% and 48% of Americans, respectively.

Why does Chinese society, which suffers from acute job loss and a youth unemployment rate close to 17%, embrace a technology it knows is likely to take away more jobs?

The question was answered three decades ago. The answer is not a narrative about AI, but about an earlier transformation also perceived as inevitable.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

On “Problems of Criticism”

Harmon Siegel at Artforum:

IT WAS 1968, and Barbara Rose was excoriating her Artforum colleagues in the pages of the magazine. Assassinations, riots, and wars were ripping the country apart. Yet somehow these writers were wasting their energy and talents debating how sculpture could acknowledge its dependence on the floor. Their zeal would have been appropriate “to a discussion of black power, urban renewal or war resistance.” But in a “morally and politically neutral activity like art criticism,” it was worse than absurd. It was repugnant.

Today, one rarely encounters the kind of stridency that Rose deplored in critics like Rosalind Krauss and Michael Fried, then leading voices in Artforum, not to mention the fury of Rose’s response. Not because criticism has become neutral, but because we displace its controversial debates onto questions of intention and impact. We ask about critics’ beliefs (do they have good politics?), their effects on audiences (do they make their readers better?), and their institutional positions (are they complicit with bad actors?). These arguments remain lively, even vicious. But we no longer argue about whether art as such is a matter of life and death—we assume that it’s not. Consequently, critics aren’t prompted to ask about the political valence of their own activity: Is criticism itself a moral good?

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

The Political Lessons Of The Weather Underground

Michael Kazin at The Point:

“The duty of every revolutionary is to make the revolution.” Every New Leftist in the late 1960s was familiar with that axiom, attributed to Fidel Castro, and most took it to heart. Yet in a leaderless movement, there were numerous ways to comply. Some sought to advance the revolution with marches demanding the U.S. pull out of Indochina right away, allowing the indigenous communists to win. Others set up women’s clinics, radical bookshops and food co-ops, or moved into rural and urban communes. Such institutions “prefigured” those that radicals longed to build in the ashes of the evil system they aimed to destroy. But the jefe of Cuban communism and his bosom comrade Che Guevara had made their revolution with guns and bombs. And they were urging leftists around the world, in Guevara’s words, to “create two, three, many Vietnams”—wars against imperialism—before Bolivian troops captured and murdered the guerilla icon in 1967.

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Mira Nair Finds a New Audience as Mother of Zohran Mamdani

Anupreeta Das in The New York Times:

Mira Nair is used to getting attention. She has carved a unique perch as a filmmaker by focusing her lens on the intimate social and cultural lives of Indians. But when she began shooting her latest film, based on the unconventional life of the early 20th-century Hungarian-Indian painter Amrita Sher-Gil, she noticed that the nature of people’s attention had changed. More people started coming up to Ms. Nair, she said, recognizing her as the mother of Zohran Mamdani, the mayor of New York City. Some, including young artists on her own film set, told her that his political views resonated with them.

She noted that her husband, Mahmood Mamdani, an academic, has had his share of attention, too. At a coffee shop in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, recently, the owner gave him his beverage on the house when he found out that he was the mayor’s father and other customers cheered, Ms. Nair said.

“I feel like we have given him to the world,” she said.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Did this scientist go too far trying to save Ecuador’s wildlife?

Humberto Basilio in Science:

In late 2024, philanthropists interested in wildlife conservation got an intriguing offer: Donate to a new fund that would provide small grants to young researchers seeking to discover new kinds of tropical animals, and you could help name the new species. The Arteaga Species Discovery Fund was the brainchild of Alejandro Arteaga, a herpetologist in Ecuador eager to boost tropical conservation by accelerating efforts to document biodiversity. “We are unlikely to be effective towards saving species if we remain unaware they exist,” Arteaga wrote on a website promoting the fund.

Involving patrons in naming scientific discoveries wasn’t new; scientists have long honored financial supporters by attaching their names to newly described plants, animals, and even stars, or allowing donors to select a name. Arteaga himself had named new species after prominent figures who supported his work, including actor Leonardo DiCaprio and Islamic leader Shah Rahim al-Hussaini (also known as Aga Khan V). But Arteaga’s fundraising pitch sparked a backlash from other herpetologists. Some had long been critical of such pay-to-play schemes, fearing they encourage researchers to sidestep scientific rigor in a bid to publish new discoveries that would attract attention and donations. Others wondered whether potential donors were aware of Arteaga’s decidedly mixed reputation.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Thursday Poem

Dios Mio —Say What?

Gus the parrot blasted into the treetops
like a feathered firecracker
with zero impulse control,
one eyebrow-feather lifted
with a you-have-got-to-be-kidding attitude.

He clicked his beak in judgment,
ruffled plumage with a flair,
then leaned in like a critic
who’s unimpressed with the air.

A twig snapped.
“!Dios mio… SAY WHAT?!”

A cloud moved.
“!Dios mio… SAY WHAT?!”

His eyes bulged, his crest shot up,
his whole body vibrating
like a tiny, outraged disco ball.

No one knew what he was reacting to.
Possibly nothing.
Possibly everything.

But there he was~
a neon blur of disbelief
shouting “!Dios mio… SAY WHAT?!”
at the entire universe.

by sara Etgen-Baker ,2026

 

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Wednesday, May 20, 2026

Frampton Comes Alive! at Fifty — The improbable story of rock’s greatest live album

Jacob Bielecki at Quillette:

In 1976, Peter Frampton was a guitar player who was respected among his more popular peers despite having enjoyed no commercial success. He had only a small following in his native Britain and in a couple of American cities—and then with lightning speed, he became the biggest star on the planet. The live album Frampton Comes Alive! (1976) brought him fame and commercial success, but, as he was later to recall in his 2024 Rock and Roll Hall of Fame induction speech, “What goes up must come down. Looking back, my fall from grace was almost predetermined.”

In 1971, his band Humble Pie was on the verge of breaking into the American mainstream after finding early success in the United Kingdom. Humble Pie had been formed two years earlier by Frampton and Steve Marriott, the singer and lead guitar player with The Small Faces. Frampton met Marriott when his band The Herd opened for The Small Faces during the latter’s residency at The Marquee Club in London and the two young men bonded over the dissatisfaction they felt about their respective bands.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Synthetic “mirror life”, if created, could pose an existential threat to life on Earth

Joe Zadeh at Noema:

A group of 38 prominent scientists from around the world — including 16 members of national academies and two Nobel Laureates — called for a halt on the creation of of a novel synthetic bacteria that, if realized and accidentally leaked into the environment, could dodge typical ecological checks and lead to an uncontrollable spread of deadly infection that posed a threat not just to humans but to many forms of life upon our earth and in our oceans, from the animal to the vegetal, from the micro to the macro. They provided a robust 299-page technical report to legitimize their worries.

The organism of concern is an artificially created mirror-image form of bacteria, known popularly as mirror life.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.