Wednesday Poem

The Association of Man and Woman

Whatever badness there was
sometimes
was not of us,
but between us.

Because there was goodness,
which felt like a sure base.
While badness felt only
like incidents upon it.

The badness was only
the way you and I needed to behave,
sometimes.
Not what we were.

The badness was only
a small,
transient,
insignificant
pain,
Like the tiny, instant
pain
from the prick of a rose’s thorn,
taking joy,
for a second,
away from the fragrance of the rose.

by Peggy Freydberg
from Poems From the Pond

—The title is from a poem called “East Coker” by T.S. Eliot in Four Quartets.


Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Francis Ford Coppola found himself outside Hollywood. He’s okay with that

Jada Yuan in The Washington Post:

Twice in two days, Francis Ford Coppola will utter the same quotation. “Tolstoy once said that the great surprise of life is when you realize you’re elderly,” the great director says, slowly consuming a very small portion of silken tofu at a fine Japanese restaurant in Tribeca, which is all he’ll allow himself to eat for a midday meal these days. (Actually, it was the Russian revolutionary Leon Trotsky who said, “Old age is the most unexpected of all things that can happen to a man.” But really, who’s quibbling?) What is age to one of the most storied risk-takers in film history but another convention to be broken?

He is 85 and keeping a schedule that would buckle men of 30. “Two days ago, I was here, and then I wasn’t here,” he says, dressed, as ever, as if on permanent tropical adventure. His cobalt-blue Hawaiian shirt is covered in palm fronds and bird silhouettes — just one of many loud-patterned varieties that a costume designer created for him, at his request. He has just returned from the Rome Film Festival, seemingly without a wink of jet lag. And the night before our lunch date, he was up till the wee hours at Nobu (the man loves Japanese food), happily chatting up admirers after receiving an award from the Directors Guild for his contributions to American culture, specifically his vivid cinematic depictions of New York City — such as “The Godfather,” “The Godfather Part II” and the movie he now likes to refer to as “The Death of Michael Corleone.”

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

OpenAI’s GPT-4o Makes AI Clones of Real People With Surprising Ease

Edd Genet in Singularity Hub:

AI has become uncannily good at aping human conversational capabilities. New research suggests its powers of mimicry go a lot further, making it possible to replicate specific people’s personalities. Humans are complicated. Our beliefs, character traits, and the way we approach decisions are products of both nature and nurture, built up over decades and shaped by our distinctive life experiences.

But it appears we might not be as unique as we think. A study led by researchers at Stanford University has discovered that all it takes is a two-hour interview for an AI model to predict people’s responses to a battery of questionnaires, personality tests, and thought experiments with an accuracy of 85 percent. While the idea of cloning people’s personalities might seem creepy, the researchers say the approach could become a powerful tool for social scientists and politicians looking to simulate responses to different policy choices.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Tuesday, December 3, 2024

Hanging with the punks and the Rastas

Miranda Sawyer in The Guardian:

Vivien Goldman, the “punk professor” from London who teaches at New York University, has been involved in music from the 1970s onwards – whether writing about it, publicising it, directing pop videos, making it herself (the 1981 single Launderette) or commemorating its heroes in screenplays and musicals.

She’s best known for her punk and reggae connections: she hung out with the Sex Pistols and was Bob Marley’s PR and preferred journalist. At one point in this wide-ranging collection of her music writing, she plays Marley the Clash’s cover of Police & Thieves and, a week later, writes that she’s in a listening room at Basing Street Studios “and Bob’s voice is rolling in magical command out of the huge speakers: ‘It’s a punky reggae party…’” A movement is started, though Marley comments to Goldman that he likes “them safety pins and t’ing”, just not enough to wear them himself.

Rebel Musix is packed full of interesting encounters and memorable details, and begins in the late 1970s, when the London music scene was small enough for friendship and work to completely overlap. Goldman moved between hanging out with musicians and going home and writing about them.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

The last time a US airline crashed was on February 12, 2009

Max Roser at Our World in Data:

How far have US airlines carried passengers since February 2009? According to the US Bureau of Transportation Statistics, US airline customers traveled 13.3 trillion passenger miles since then. “Passenger miles” are a straightforward way to account for both the number of passengers and the distance they travel. A single passenger mile represents one person traveling one mile. So, five people traveling ten miles would sum to 50 passenger miles.

13.3 trillion miles is a lot! It’s equivalent to 535 million trips around the Earth or 28 million visits to the moon and back.

It is such a long distance that it is not unreasonable to measure it in light-years. One light-year is the distance light travels over one year — 5.9 trillion miles. So, the total distance traveled without a crash equals 2.3 light-years.

It is hard to visualize this vast distance. In the chart, I’ve compared it with Earth’s distance from the sun.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

On the Enduring Importance of Edward Said’s “The Question of Palestine”

Alexander Durie at Literary Hub:

The Question of Palestine was published in 1979, one year after Said’s pivotal book Orientalism and two before Covering Islam—a trilogy that helped found post-colonial theory and develop a framework to critique the West’s stereotypical and often racist lens of the Arab and Muslim world. The Question of Palestine was particularly noteworthy for being the first English-language book to narrate the Palestinian experience and deconstruct Zionism as a settler-colonial project.

It remains an essential read from arguably the most influential Palestinian-American scholar to have lived. Reading it today brings reflections on how everything and nothing has changed, as Israel’s genocidal attacks on Gaza, its bombing of Lebanon, and annexation of the West Bank continue. That is why a new re-issue of this book is so timely.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

200 innovations changing how we live

From Time Magazine:

Toi Labs TrueLoo

Every bowel movement contains clues about your health, which is why doctors often ask patients for stool samples. Now imagine if your bodily waste could be constantly monitored, tracked, and analyzed, creating a more holistic look at your health? Enter Toi Labs’ TrueLoo, an AI-powered toilet seat that optically scans your stool and urine for concerning changes. It looks like a normal toilet seat, it fits on your existing toilet, and it’s currently used in more than 50 senior living facilities. Alerts and data are currently delivered directly to care personnel in such facilities, the company has plans to release a user-facing app. “I liken it to a team of doctors that can peer into your toilet bowl every day,” says device inventor Vik Kashyap, founder and CEO of Toi Labs.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

As women in academia, having children can feel impossible. Talking about it makes us feel less alone

Iglasias and Freeman in Science:

Cecilia hadn’t expected the video to resonate so deeply. She often watched online talks about her field of research. But this one didn’t just present pioneering scientific ideas; it put into words the uncomfortable reality she had been grappling with. She was nearly 30 years old and single, and she had recently interviewed for a postdoc position that would require her to uproot her life yet again. She couldn’t ignore a growing question: whether and how she would be able to have children. The talk, by anthropologist Marcia Inhorn, explored the silent struggles many highly educated women face in balancing their careers not just with motherhood, but with what comes before: relationships and planning for a family. It was an “aha!” moment. Cecilia sent it to her friend and fellow academic Erika, who responded immediately: “Why haven’t we talked about this before?”

We’d often discussed how motherhood seemed like a career roadblock. But Inhorn’s talk illuminated something else: Many women in academia weren’t delaying parenthood by choice. Rather, they found themselves unable to reconcile their biological clocks with the unpredictable, demanding pace of an academic career.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Tuesday Poem

Tiny Garden

In the early morning light,
there is a certain majesty
to my tiny garden
………
The plants within their pots
have grown with abandon
beyond their framework of ceramic
and half-bourbon barrels
………
Tendrils reach in all directions
some hanging,
floating on the air
………
Others twisting round each other
in loving embrace
Each stem and vine and leaf
offers a gesture of kindness
and hopefulness

by Jessica McQuillen

 

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Monday, December 2, 2024

Does the rationalist blogosphere need to update?

Sheon Han in Asterisk:

The origin of rationalist writing is commonly traced back to the comments section of Overcoming Bias, a group blog about cognitive biases and related topics that is now the personal blog of economist Robin Hanson. Eliezer Yudkowsky, a prominent contributor, spun off an online forum called LessWrong in 2009, dedicated to the practice of “applied rationality.” Within a few years, its top writers — for example, Scott Alexander, Katja Grace, Luke Muehlhauser — had launched their own blogs, forming what became the rationalist blogosphere.

The internet of the early aughts was a warm petri dish for blogging. Compared to its contemporaries, early rationalist writings were like Crooked Timber but more left-brained, Marginal Revolution but more subcultural, and 3 Quarks Daily but weirder. Topically, there was a resemblance to Aaron Swartz’s blog archive Raw Thought — select a random article and you might find anything from a diary entry to a policy memo, a technical specification, or a manifesto.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

The reason that even hands-free calls are risky for drivers

Robert Rosenberger in Psyche:

While behind the wheel of a car, a significant level of distraction can accompany one action in particular: phone usage. For some, this can result in severe driving impairment. It represents a serious danger hidden within the connective rhythms of our everyday lives.

Some countries have made it illegal to hold a phone while driving, effectively outlawing handheld calls behind the wheel. So have several states in the US.

Safety advocates go further and argue that even hands-free versions of calling, texting and internet usage while driving can be dangerous. And yet, it is possible to infer the opposite from the world around us. For example, those laws that ban handheld phones simultaneously allow for hands-free phone usage behind the wheel, perhaps implying that this is a safe thing to do. What’s more, the dashboards of contemporary cars are built with the expectation that drivers will be using their phones.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Americans agree politics is broken − here are 5 mathematical ideas for fixing key problems

Ismar Volić at The Conversation:

Americans say they are angry at the political dysfunction, disgusted with the divisive rhetoric, weary from the lack of options, and feel unheard and unrepresented. I am a mathematician who studies quantitative aspects of democracy, and in my view, the reason for this widespread dissatisfaction is evident: The mechanisms of American democracy are broken at a fundamental level.

Research shows that there are clear mathematical fixes for these malfunctions that would implement sound democratic practices supported by evidence. They won’t solve every ailment of American democracy: For example, Altering Supreme Court rulings or expanding voting access are more political or administrative than they are based in math. Nevertheless, each of these changes – especially in combination with one another – could make American democracy more responsive to its citizens.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Art And Beauty

Rachel Wetzler at Artforum:

Writing in 1993, the late critic Dave Hickey described beauty as a kind of dirty word in the art world, believed to be hopelessly tainted by the market: “Beautiful art sells. If it sells itself, it is an idolatrous commodity; if it sells something else, it is a seductive advertisement.” Perhaps the clearest sign of beauty’s shifting fortune is the rehabilitation of Hickey’s own critical reputation. In his introduction to the 2023 reissue of his 1993 collection The Invisible DragonEssays on Beauty, he describes the paradoxical combination of renown and revulsion with which his work was met: “In the Dragon’s wake,” he writes, “the endowed lecturer was deposited unceremoniously at a Ramada Inn beside an empty highway and left to dine out of the candy machine.” (Indeed, I recall being assigned an essay from the book in a methods seminar during my first semester of graduate school back in 2010, where it was cast as a brash and unserious provocation.) But returning to The Invisible Dragon now, in anticipation of the new collection of his writings Feint of Heart, posthumously published by David Zwirner Books this past September, I wonder if he wasn’t on to something. For Hickey, the invocation of beauty didn’t represent a conservative retrenchment, but an appealing anarchy: It directly addresses itself to the beholder, requiring neither interpretive intermediaries nor ameliorative social purpose.

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Why Some Human Brains Don’t Rot for Thousands of Years

Kermit Pattison in Scientific American:

No part of our body is as perishable as the brain. Within minutes of losing its supply of blood and oxygen, our delicate neurological machinery begins to suffer irreversible damage. The brain is our most energy-greedy organ, and in the hours after death, its enzymes typically devour it from within. As cellular membranes rupture, the brain liquifies. Within days, microbes may consume the remnants in the stinky process of putrefaction. In a few years, the skull becomes just an empty cavity.

In some cases, however, brains outlast all other soft tissues and remain intact for hundreds or thousands of years. Archaeologists have been mystified to discover naturally preserved brains in ancient graveyards, tombs, mass graves and even shipwrecks. Scientists at the University of Oxford published a study earlier this year that revealed that such brains are more common than previously recognized. By surveying centuries of scientific literature, researchers counted more than 4,400 cases of preserved brains that were up to 12,000 years old. “The brain just decays super quickly, and it’s really weird that we find it preserved,” says Alexandra Morton-Hayward, a molecular scientist at Oxford and lead author of the new study. “My overarching question is: Why on Earth is this possible? Why is it happening in the brain and no other organ?” Such unusual preservation involves the “misfolding” of proteins—the cellular building blocks—and bears intriguing similarities to the pathologies that cause some neurodegenerative conditions.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

What’s the secret to living to 100?

Smiriti Mallapaty in Nature:

Scientists in Boston, Massachusetts have made reprogrammed stem cells from the blood of centenarians. They plan to share the cells with other researchers to better understand the factors that contribute to a long and healthy life. Early experiments are already providing insights on brain ageing. Centenarians offer an opportunity to study longevity. People who’ve lived to 100 have an amazing ability to bounce back from insult and injury, says George Murphy, a stem-cell biologist at the Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine. One centenarian he knows recovered from the 1912 Spanish flu and COVID-19, twice. One theory that explains centenarians’ robust age is that they possess a genetic makeup that protects them from diseases.

But testing that idea is a challenge. People of that age are rare, which makes blood and skin samples from them a precious resource for research. That gave Murphy and his colleagues the idea to create a bank of centenarian cells that could be shared among scientists.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Mondrian: His Life, His Art, His Quest for the Absolute

Stephen Smith at Literary Review:

Version 1.0.0

The maker of abstract grids enclosing lozenges of colour, Piet Mondrian (1872–1944) was one of the two or three epoch-shaping artists of the last century. But his life story isn’t widely known and few of us would be able to identify him from a photograph. Because his work seems cool and smart, and designers have sampled it ad nauseam for that very reason, we tend to imagine that he was probably cool and smart too.

The reality is rather more complex and curious, according to Nicholas Fox Weber’s assiduous and sensitive biography. Mondrian lived alone in a series of rented flats which weren’t much more than bedsits. They were in crowded corners of big cities: Paris, London and New York. He could seldom afford to heat his digs, and he ate sparingly, even when he was entertained by his few loyal supporters. He was a hypochondriac (to be fair to Mondrian, he also enjoyed poor health). He expected his long-suffering friends to console him, but he could be glassily unavailable to them. As with a number of artists, there were difficulties with girls: broadly speaking, Mondrian avoided them, though he appreciated their company as dance partners. This frowningly serious man liked to comb out his toothbrush moustache, climb into an ensemble perilously close to a zoot suit and cut a rug to the latest dance style – the Charleston or the boogie-woogie, say.

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Sunday, December 1, 2024

How forensic linguists use grammar, syntax and vocabulary to help crack cold cases

Julia Webster Ayuso in The Dial:

On the evening of October 16, 1984, the body of four-year-old Grégory Villemin was pulled out of the Vologne river in Eastern France. The little boy had disappeared from the front garden of his home in Lépanges-sur-Vologne earlier that afternoon. His mother had searched desperately all over the small village, but nobody had seen him.

It quickly became clear that his death wasn’t a tragic accident. The boy’s hands and feet had been tied with string, and the family had received several threatening letters and voicemails before he disappeared. The following day, another letter was sent to the boy’s father, Jean-Marie Villemin. “I hope you will die of grief, boss,” it read in messy, joined-up handwriting. “Your money will not bring your son back. This is my revenge, you bastard.”

It was the beginning of what would become France’s best-known unsolved murder case. The case has been reopened several times, and multiple suspects have been arrested. Grégory’s mother, Christine, was charged with the crime and briefly jailed but later acquitted. Jean-Marie also served prison time after he shot dead his cousin Bernard Laroche, who had emerged as a prime suspect. The investigating judge, Jean-Michel Lambert, who was assigned the case at age 32 and made critical mistakes early in the investigation, killed himself in 2017.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

X