David Bowie: The Making Of A Modern Saint

Simon Critchley at The Guardian:

Beginning with the Anglicanism of St Mary’s Church in Bromley, where Bowie sang in the choir, continuing with his immersion in Tibetan Buddhism in the late 1960s and on to the occultism of Aleister Crowley, Ormerod unpacks the religious preoccupations of Bowie’s art in compelling prose. But still, it all seems rather straightforward and the little stabs at philosophy (Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, and so on) feel a tiny bit Wiki.

But the book takes on a growing velocity when analysing Bowie’s later work, particularly in the chapter on Heathen (I’ve not read anything as good on that album). This momentum develops into fine, detailed discussions of The Next Day and Blackstar, and also Lazarus, his stunning final experiment with musical theatre. What makes these sections so good is that Ormerod deals with Bowie as text; as the occasion for close reading, which I think is what his work, like all good art, deserves.

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

On Luc Besson’s Dracula

Tyler Dean at Artforum:

Coppola’s adaptation cleaves relatively closely to the plot of Stoker’s novel, but Besson’s script replicates, almost exactly, only the parts of Coppola’s film that deviate from Stoker’s story. In both films, Dracula is explicitly the undead Vlad Ţepeș (the Wallachian warlord whose moniker Stoker borrowed while eschewing the rest of the actual history), in love with his wife, who dies during the Count’s fight against the Ottoman Empire. In both films, the character of Mina Murray is reimagined as the reincarnation and doppelgänger of said dead wife, and lengthy sequences are added in which Dracula and Mina have a secret courtship and fall in love. But in its deviation from Stoker’s text, Besson’s Dracula introduces some intriguing if somewhat underdeveloped ideas: Besson combines Renfield (Dracula’s asylum-bound thrall) and Lucy (his first victim) into a single character. The Van Helsing role is filled by an unnamed priest, played by Christoph Waltz, who muses about the obligations of lapsed Christians (like Dracula) to a God who has failed them. This Dracula also has all the visual hallmarks of a typical Besson film: an arresting, overblown style; intricately choreographed, dance-like action sequences (and dance sequences); slapstick with a 50 percent hit rate; weird, cutesy little CGI dudes.

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Regenerative Biology’s Baby Steps

Saima Sidik in Harvard Magazine:

An axolotl is a salamander with a superpower: it can regrow its limbs. When a predator chomps off its leg or it loses an appendage in an accident, a new one will quickly take its place.

Many scientists would like to know how the axolotl does this and whether it’s possible to stimulate lost limbs to regrow in humans, too. In recent decades, research has focused on how cells around an axolotl’s injury site reorganize to kick off limb regeneration. But in fact, the animal’s whole body jumps into action, as regenerative biologist Jessica Whited and her colleagues describe in a study recently published in Cell. The molecular marks of limb amputation were evident in “basically all the places we looked,” Whited says, including in unamputated limbs.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl Halftime Show Was an Exuberant Act of Resistance

Andrew Chow in Time Magazine:

When Bad Bunny emerged from a row of towering sugar cane stalks to kick off his Super Bowl halftime show performance, it might have been easy to read the set design as little more than a lush backdrop: a tableau of Caribbean paradise imported to the Bay. Bad Bunny certainly didn’t explicitly acknowledge the sugar cane: He was too busy singing “Tití Me Preguntó,” a brash ode to his sexual prowess, which has racked up a billion streams both on Spotify and YouTube.

But like everything that Bad Bunny does, the scene cut deeper than its appearance. The Puerto Rican singer surrounded himself with men and women cutting down the stalks, summoning the territory’s centuries-long colonization, in which sugar played a central role. Spain brought the crop to the island in the 1500s and set up massive plantations manned by slaves. At the end of the 19th century, the United States took the island by force and set up its own lucrative sugar colony, with mainland corporations controlling a significant share of production and reaping massive profits.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Sunday, February 8, 2026

The Limits to Trump’s Power in America and the World

Henry Farrell in Programmable Mutter:

did the Ezra Klein show last Friday, and it went up on the NYT website this morning. A whole lot has happened in the meantime. The way I think is through talking with other people, and a lot of thinking happened in the conversation. It wove together what happened in the world last week with what is happening in Minneapolis, in ways that I am still trying to work out. So here is a short interim report, written less as a polished essay than an attempt to pull these thoughts together.

What became clearer to me, as Ezra and I talked, is the connection between the limits to US power in the world, and the limits to the Trump administration’s power inside the borders of America. We briefly mentioned a long-ago fight that I had with the late David Graeber, who advanced a theory of world politics in his book, Debt, that described the global economy as a tribute system, and emphasized the awesome power of the United States to terrify the rest of the world into submission. Back then, I disagreed with Graeber’s claims and Graeber took strong exception to my disagreement, provoking a very long response from me. The upshot of my argument was that the United States is incapable of pulling what I called the “Delian League Switcheroo.” Thucydides describes how 5th century BCE Athens transformed its alliance against the Persians, the Delian League, into a protection racket to squeeze allies and turn them into vassals. I argued back then that the US would find it very hard to do this at scale…

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Eternal Recurrences

In The Ideas Letter, Aaron Benanav, Leif Weatherby, and Evgeny Morozov debate AI, capitalism and socialism:

Evgeny Morozov knows how to theorize (and, a fortiori, how to intellectually provoke) like few other mortals. The elegance of his argumentation and the sophistication of his critiques are legendary. Several issues back, Morozov launched a grenade by suggesting that socialist attempts to harness AI have treated it like other basic tools of capitalist production—as a neutral instrument that can simply be redirected—rather than as a transformative force that actively shapes social values and human capacities.

We now have two responses to Morozov’s original essay, one from the Cornell historian Aaron Benanav, a target of Morozov’s earlier salvo, and another from the NYU scholar Leif Weatherby. For Benanav, humanity stands between two technological revolutions—generative AI and the green energy transition—and how we choose between them will determine the shape of the future.  His essay develops a broader project of designing a post-capitalist “multidimensional economy” (for more see his coruscating essays in New Left Review this past year ) while rebutting Morozov’s claim that such a framework would stifle technological “worldmaking.”

Weatherby, who looks at both Morozov and Benanav, argues that contemporary Marxist and socialist analyses of technology fail to engage adequately with the entanglement between technological rationality and capitalist ideology. To understand AI and the digital economy, Weatherby suggests, one must see them as the logical outcomes of a longstanding merger between mathematics, computation, and neoliberal governance—a fusion that has turned “optimization” into both the logic and the theology of capitalism itself.

Morozov responds in analytically stentorian tones asserting misrepresentation. His rebuttal is a blistering defense of his original essay on socialism and AI.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Trump’s Dollar

Steffen Murau in Phenomenal World:

One year into Donald Trump’s second term, the global economic order is being given a facelift that wouldn’t look out of place at his Mar-a-Lago beach club. The President has turned his famous penchant for tariffs—“the most beautiful word in the English language”—into an agenda for national rejuvenation, imposing them on allies and enemies alike. Stunned commentators have made various attempts to interpret the sweeping trade restrictions: as a break with the US role in superintending world capitalism, a tool to bully individual states into signing favorable deals, or a mindless assertion of raw power. Yet there is still no consensus about either the nature of this shift or its long-term implications.

Some have sought answers in the work of Trump’s former economic adviser Stephen Miran, now member of the Federal Reserve’s board of governors, whose policy document A User’s Guide to Restructuring the Global Trading System was published in the runup to the 2024 election. The paper appears to explain the logic behind many of the decisions which have played out since, calling for a “generational change” to “put American industry on fairer grounds vis-à-vis the rest of the world,” with tariffs the primary vehicle. The dollar’s strength for the past half century, writes Miran, has made US exports too expensive for the rest of the world to buy, while making imports too cheap for American consumers to pass up. The result has been the degradation of American manufacturing and industrial output. “Persistent dollar overvaluation” is said to flow from the way in which “dollar assets function as the world’s reserve currency.” It is simply too burdensome for the US to “finance the provision of reserve assets and the defense umbrella, as the manufacturing and tradeable sectors bear the brunt of the costs.”

Miran is not alone in arguing for the dollar’s devaluation.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

The Story of the First Human to Receive Neuralink Implants: “This Technology Has Brought My Life Back”

From VOI:

JAKARTA – Amid the excitement of the World Governments Summit (WGS) 2026 in Dubai, United Arab Emirates (UAE), a forum usually filled with majestic speeches, technological futurism and discussions of world leaders, there was a guest whose presence was the most silent, but his message was the most resounding. Nolan is the first human to receive a Neuralink brain implant, a breakthrough that has only been present in science fiction books. And in the forum held on February 3-5, Nolan brought a simple sentence: “This technology has brought my life back.” Nolan still remembers the day he was told he would be the first subject in human history to undergo a Neuralink implant. There were no tears, no long pauses like in a movie scene. There was urgency.

“Everything happened very quickly. All we think about is logistics: what to prepare, how to get there. But in my heart, I think about the possibilities. I think it will be fun, and I want to help people,” he said on the sidelines of the WGS 2026 event, as quoted Friday (6/2). The decision was not an easy one for someone living with quadriplegia, a condition that left him paralyzed from the neck down after an accident years ago. But for Nolan, the courage came from one thing: the belief that his life could still be of benefit.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Sunday Poem

my dream about being white

—re: Black History Month in the U.S.

hey music and
me
only white,
hair a flutter of
fall leaves
circling my perfect
line of a nose,
no lips,
no behind, hey
white me
and I’m wearing
white history
but there’s no future
in those clothes
so i take them off and
wake up
dancing.

by Lucille Clifton

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Friday, February 6, 2026

Paul Bloom: Is there a God-shaped hole?

Paul Bloom at Small Potatoes:

We are born with a yearning for the spiritual and transcendent, and the difficult truths about life that we learn about as we grow older—such as the inevitability of death and the existence of terrible injustices—further push us towards faith. Without religion, or something close enough to religion, we are unhappy and unsatisfied. Blaise Pascal was wise when he said that secular pursuits can’t quench our thirst—“the infinite abyss can only be filled by an infinite and immutable object, that is to say, only by God Himself.” As it’s sometimes put, there is a God-shaped hole that we all need to fill.

I know a lot of people who believe all this. But I’m becoming increasingly confident that all of the above sentences are false.

There was always reason to be skeptical. For one thing, the idea of inborn spiritual yearning never made much evolutionary sense.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Why did SpaceX just apply to launch 1 million satellites?

Jonathan O’Callaghan in New Scientist:

We are only a month into 2026, yet it’s already clear what one of the major space stories of the year is going to be: mega-constellations, and the ongoing attempts to launch thousands of satellites into Earth’s orbit.

The latest development is that SpaceX has asked the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for permission to launch 1 million orbital data centre satellites. The request is unprecedented. The previous largest filing with the FCC, also by SpaceX, was for 42,000 Starlink satellites in 2019.

“This is beyond what’s been proposed by any constellation,” says Victoria Samson at the Secure World Foundation in the US.

SpaceX already operates the largest fleet of satellites in orbit, the Starlink internet constellation, which makes up about 9500 of the 14,500 satellites in orbit – but the fleet represents just 1 per cent of SpaceX’s planned orbital data centre satellites. Those Starlink satellites alone are already making conditions in orbit hazardous, with SpaceX having to dodge 300,000 collisions in 2025.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Mao’s Mango

Christin Bohnke at JSTOR Daily:

In August 1968, a visiting foreign minister from Pakistan, Mian Arshad Hussain, gave Mao a box of mangoes as a gift during a state visit. Presenting mangoes has a long tradition in Pakistan, but in China, the fruit was virtually unknown. Mao passed the box to workers occupying the Tsinghua campus in Beijing, who were attempting to control the Red Guards stationed there. The scholar of Chinese visual culture Alfreda Murck writes that the mangoes carried an implicit message: from now on, the workers, not the Red Guards, would be in charge of education and the transformation of China in Mao’s image.

According to Murck, even Mao could not have anticipated the consequences of his gift. Because the mangoes came from the supreme leader, they were transformed, in the eyes of the workers, from a simple fruit into an object endowed with attributes of the divine. William H. Hinton, the author of Fanshen, compiled eyewitness accounts of workers who reported staying up all night, touching the mangoes, and marveling at their new station as protégés of the Chairman. Using the momentum, the official party cadres concocted a propaganda campaign surrounding the mangoes, workers, and Mao, and in doing so, according to the political scientist Richard Baum, effectively signed “the death warrant of the Red Guards.”

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Reading Infinite Jest Now

Hermione Hoby at The New Yorker:

David Foster Wallace’s “Infinite Jest,” a book whose notorious bigness comprises both physical size and reputational heft, turns thirty in February. The occasion is a moment to ask how a novel that mourns addiction and venerates humility and patience became a glib cultural punch line—a byword for literary arrogance, a totem of masculine pretentiousness, a red flag if spotted on the shelves of a prospective partner, and reading matter routinely subjected to the word “performative” in its most damning sense. At a thousand and seventy-nine pages, “Infinite Jest” has become a one-liner.

Last year, an article in the Guardian explored the risks of so-called performative reading under the title “Is it OK to read Infinite Jest in public?” For the Guardian writer, the question was a rare refutation of Betteridge’s law, the journalistic adage stating that any headline ending in a question mark can be answered with a no. Here the answer was a nervous and tentative yes. Mostly, though, the piece drew on and perpetuated the archetype of the noxious “Infinite Jest” bro which has solidified in the quick-drying cement of social media. In 2020, the “Jest” bro hit the big screen in Emerald Fennell’s heavy-handed “Promising Young Woman,” in which a D.F.W. fanboy tells Carey Mulligan’s character that she has to read “Consider the Lobster,” one of the author’s essay collections.

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Reflections on Getting a College Education in Prison

Thomas E. Miles at The Hedgehog Review:

Why bother? What’s the point? These are questions that inevitably arise in conversations about college programs in prisons. But these questions make certain assumptions about education in general and higher education in prisons specifically. What is it, exactly, that is not worth it, according to skeptics and naysayers, about college education in prison? Ought we not to consider just what the point of education is in the first place? My position as a prisoner has given me the opportunity to contemplate the question and arrive at some insight into it.

Sometime around 2017, I applied to the Bennington College Prison Education Initiative (PEI) at Great Meadow Correctional Facility in Comstock, New York.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.