Less Is More: How Degrowth Will Save The World

Leon Vlieger at The Inquisitive Biologist:

I have been promising/threatening for a while to cover degrowth, and thanks to a United States Society for Ecological Economics book club, now I will. In Less is More, economic anthropologist Jason Hickel identifies capitalism as the cause of our problems—the sort of criticism that makes many people really uncomfortable. Fortunately, he is an eloquent and charismatic spokesman who patiently but firmly walks you through the history of capitalism, exposes flaws of proposed fixes, and then lays out a litany of sensible solutions. It quickly confirms that sinking feeling most of us will have: that the economy is not working for us. What is perhaps eye-opening is that this is not by accident, but by design.

It helps, as Hickel quickly does, to clarify two things. First, he does not object to economic growth per se. Indeed, many of the world’s poorest countries need to grow further to meet basic human needs. The problem is growth for growth’s sake. In nature, growth is ubiquitous but normally follows a sigmoidal curve of some kind, eventually coming to a halt. Capitalism is different, which brings us to point two. People often confuse capitalism with markets and trade, but they pre-date capitalism by millennia. This is all textbook Marx, but, Hickel explains, markets and trade are organised around use-value: we trade for what is useful to us. Capitalism, on the other hand, is organised around exchange-value: goods are sold to make a profit, which is then reinvested to generate more profit. Growth is a structural imperative of capitalism: “It is a system that pulls ever-expanding quantities of nature and human labour into circuits of accumulation” (p. 40). The results are plain for all to see: environmental destruction and human immiseration benefitting a small minority.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

There’s Life Inside Earth’s Crust

Karen Lloyd at Noema Magazine:

Buried in the deepest darkness underground, eating strange food, playing with the laws of thermodynamics and living on unrelatably long timescales, intraterrestrials have remained largely remote and aloof from humans. However, the microbes that dwell in the deep subsurface biosphere affect our lives in innumerable ways.

On a planetary scale, they play a key role in regulating Earth’s level of oxygenation. In addition, without the nutrients recycled by intraterrestrials in the seafloor, such as iron and nitrogen, phytoplankton would be severely limited in their ability to make oxygen for us. Intraterrestrials are also uniquely suited to detoxify our worst waste by breathing radioactive uranium, arsenic, organic carcinogens and other nasty stuff. So in effect, they have helped us develop as a species without poisoning ourselves. Given how intrinsically entwined intraterrestrials are in Earth systems, they might also play an outsized role in how Earth responds to human-made climate change.

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

In the Matter of the Commas

Matthew Zipf at The American Scholar:

The most conspicuous mark of Renata Adler’s style is its abundance of commas. In her two novels, Speedboat (1976) and Pitch Dark (1983), there are a few sentences that edge on the absurd: “For some time, Leander had spoken, on the phone, of a woman, a painter, whom he had met, one afternoon, outside the gym, and whom he was trying to introduce, along with Simon, into his apartment and his life.” A critic tallied it up, counting “40 words and ten commas—Guinness Book of World Records?” Each of those commas had its grammatical defense, but Adler’s style did not comply with the usual standards of fluent prose. She cordoned off phrases, such as “on the phone,” that other writers would just run through. One reader, responding to a 1983 New York magazine profile of Adler, wrote in a letter to the editor, “If the examples of Renata Adler’s writing … are typical, Miss Adler will never make it to the road. The way is ‘jarringly, piece by piece, line by line, and without interruption’ blocked by commas.” The reader was quoting one of Adler’s own comma-laden critical phrases against her. The editors titled the letter “Comma Wealth.”

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

How to Tell if Someone Is Rich Without Asking Them

Ashley Fike in Vice:

Not every rich person is rolling up in a Lamborghini or dripping in designer logos. If anything, the truly wealthy often move through the world a little quieter, but a lot more confidently. Look closely enough, and the signs are everywhere. Behavior is one of the first giveaways. Educator and content creator Dani Payne explained it best: accents might stand out (especially in the UK), but so does what someone talks about and what counts as “polite conversation.” In certain circles, asking about money is considered wildly inappropriate.

Vocabulary matters too. Being effortlessly well-read and well-spoken signals a lifetime of cultural grooming. It’s not just sounding smart — it’s knowing exactly when and how to flex it. Then there’s experience. Are they name-dropping ski resorts, art showings, or elite clubs? Payne points out that exposure to “old boys clubs” and highbrow events is often baked into upper-class life, part of what’s called “cultural capital.” People who grew up around wealth move through rare spaces with an ease that feels completely unremarkable to them, even though it stands out to everyone else.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Tuesday Poem

When Illness Is Cure

Moonmen gush over the blue:  all noticed Earth
looked more alive and tenuous, more startling
and alone than could have been guessed.
On TV last week, one of them got stuck
repeating “fragile,” as if the word’s gentle alarm
would wake us.  After he spoke, shots of fires
and floods.  When they returned to his face
he seemed older, sadder: I imagined him
in the capsule reaching back
putting a hand under the world
as if supporting the head of a child.
Comfort is the cause of climate change.
That we can create it to a degree
rats and giraffes can’t.  Comfort and ease.
Fridge of beer in the basement
to save walking upstairs.
Taking the car to get the paper
at the bottom of a long driveway
when it’s raining.  Clicking pictures of desires
until they abracadabra into our hands.
And pain will be the thing that saves us.
When New York becomes Atlantis.  When only angels
are allowed to fly.  When we have to shoot
our cars in the head.  Push has come to shove
for us: we’re quick to notice

when the kitchen’s on fire but not
when our way of life is burning down.
It’s our nature: how many explorers
did the dishes, painted the living room:
the point was to leave home, not take care of it.
It’s easier to ask what’s out there
than in here, but the new moonshot’s
internal: can we discover we love life
enough to save it from ourselves?
I won’t be here to find out is why I ask.

by Bob Hicok

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Will the Humanities Survive Artificial Intelligence?

D. Graham Burnett in The New Yorker:

You can want different things from a university—superlative basketball, an arts center, competent instruction in philosophy or physics, even a cure for cancer. No wonder these institutions struggle to keep everyone happy. And everyone isn’t happy. The Trump Administration has effectively declared open war on higher education, targeting it with deep cuts to federal grant funding. University presidents are alarmed, as are faculty members, and anyone who cares about the university’s broader role.

Because I’m a historian of science and technology, part of my terrain is the evolving role of the university—from its medieval, clerical origins to the entrepreneurial R. & D. engines of today. I teach among the humanists, and my courses are anchored in the traditional program of the liberal arts, in the hope of giving shape to humans equal to the challenge of freedom. But my subject is the rise of a techno-scientific understanding of the world, and of ourselves in it. And, if that is what you care about, the White House’s chain-jerk mugging feels, frankly, like a sideshow. The juggernaut actually barrelling down the quad is A.I., coming at us with shocking speed.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Monday, April 28, 2025

The Centuries-Long Struggle to Make English Words Behave

Dennis Duncan in the New York Times:

A century ago, one of the richest men in the world decided to wade into the public sphere by throwing his weight behind a series of cuts that would reach into every corner of American life. The president of the day, sensing early support for these reforms and not wishing to be left behind, jumped on board with impulsive zeal, demanding that all federal offices implement the cutbacks with immediate effect.

The year was 1906, the protagonists Andrew Carnegie and Theodore Roosevelt, and the campaign was the movement for simplified spelling, which proposed to trim the fat from the English language by turning words like “through” and “although” into “thru” and “altho.”

The president’s fervor would prove incautious. Stripping the written language of its historical idiosyncrasies is by no means an easy sell. After all, we have a kind of sunk-cost attachment to difficult words since we expended so much effort in learning them as children.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Beyond The Last Horizon: More from the AI Futures Project

Scott Alexander at the AI Futures Project:

Welcome to the AI Futures Project blog. We’re the group behind AI 2027, and we plan to use this space to go beyond the scenario – whether that’s speculating on alternate branches, announcing cases where we changed our minds, or discussing our methodology in more detail. Today we want to talk more about time horizons.

We’ve been accused of relying too heavily on extending straight lines on graphs. We’d like to think we’re a little more sophisticated than that, but we can’t deny that a nice straight line is a great place for a forecast to start. And METR’s Measuring AI Ability To Complete Long Tasks has some pretty sweet straight lines:

This graph tracks progress in the length of coding task that an AI can do with > 80% success rate. Task length is determined by the average human – so for example, GPT-4 had 80-20 odds of successfully finishing a task that a human could do in a minute; Claude Sonnet 3.7 has 80-20 odds at a task humans can do in fifteen.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Habeas corpus: A thousand-year-old legal principle for defending rights

Andrea Seielstad in The Conversation:

The legal doctrine of “habeas corpus,” a Latin phrase that has its American roots in English law as early as the 12th century, stands as a barrier to unlawful arrest.

In its essence, habeas corpus protects any person, whether citizen or not, from being illegally confinedHabeas corpus is Latin for “you shall have the body” and requires a judge literally to have the body of any incarcerated person brought physically forward so that the legality of their detention may be assessed.

That is why habeas, sometimes also called the “Great Writ,” is front and center right now in many of the lawsuits challenging the Trump administration’s arrest and deportation of noncitizen studentsscholars, humanitarian refugees and others.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

We Are Apes That Have Invented Ourselves

Kevin Kelly at The Long Now:

What’s distinctive about humans is that homo sapiens domesticated themselves. We are self-domesticated apes. Anthropologist Brian Hare characterizes recent human evolution (Late Pleistocene) as “Survival of the Friendliest”, arguing that in our self-domestication we favored prosociality — the tendency to be friendly, cooperative, and empathetic. We chose the most cooperative, the least aggressive, the less bullying types, and that trust in others resulted in greater prosperity, which in turn spread neoteny genes, and other domestication traits, into our populations.

Domesticated species often show increased playfulness, extended juvenile behavior, and even enhanced social learning abilities. Humans continued to extend their childhood far later than almost any other animal. This extended childhood enabled an extended time to learn beyond inherent instincts, but it also demanded greater parental resources and nuanced social bonds. We are the first animals we domesticated. Not dogs. We first domesticated ourselves, and then we were able to domesticate dogs. Our domestication is not just about neoteny and reduced aggression and increased sociability. We also altered other genes and traits.

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Style Is Joy: On Iris Apfel

Dorothea Lasky at The Paris Review:

Against the backdrop of a cold white room, Iris Apfel’s yellow outfit, which she wore on the occasion of her hundredth birthday, sings its own joyous song. Both here and elsewhere, Apfel, an artist and fashion designer, often paired gorgeous things sensually by color and texture, rather than by invoking some obvious theory or idea. She was not afraid to wear a yellow tulle coat with yellow silk pants (which she designed herself in collaboration with H&M). She celebrated yellow vivaciously; she took up space with yellow. With her arms raised in this picture, she looks like some sort of bishop or religious figure. Her open palms throw spectral glitter upon us. A spiritual icon. Just by looking at her, I feel her upturned palms manifesting my dreams.

Apfel famously said: “More is more and less is a bore.” This statement was in conversation with Coco Chanel’s equally famous fashion advice: “Before you leave the house, look in the mirror and remove one accessory.” Apfel’s embrace of “more” surely was a celebration of life itself.

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Your Genome Is a Specimen. Let’s Treat It Like One

Anish Kumar in Undark Magazine:

The announcement that 23andMe is filing for bankruptcy came as little surprise to many who had been following the company’s tumultuous year. CEO Ann Wojcicki was unable to rescue the genetic testing company from its unsustainable business model, leaving some 15 million consumers in limbo about the fate of their genetic data. Within a day, articles and online forums began advising customers to request the deletion of their data, warning of the possibilities of misuse that may ensue. Though 23andMe has always branded itself as a company dedicated to data protection, its own privacy statement makes it clear that customer data can be sold in the event of bankruptcy, merger, or acquisition, meaning a new entity may inherit the right to use (or profit from) 23andMe’s massive trove of genetic data.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Baffling chronic pain eases after doses of gut microbes

Humberto Basilio in Nature:

What Rina Green calls her “living hell” began with an innocuous backache. By late 2022, two years later, pain flooded her entire body daily and could be so intense that she couldn’t get out of bed. Painkillers and physical therapy offered little relief. She began using a wheelchair.

Green has fibromyalgia, a mysterious condition with symptoms of widespread and chronic muscle pain and fatigue. No one knows why people get fibromyalgia, and it is difficult to treat. But eight months ago, Green received an experimental therapy: pills containing living microorganisms of the kind that populate the healthy human gut. Her pain decreased substantially, and Green, who lives in Haifa, Israel, and is now 38, can go on walks — something she hadn’t done since her fibromyalgia diagnosis.

Green was one of 14 participants in a trial of microbial supplements for the condition. All but two reported an improvement in their symptoms. The trial is so small that “we should take the results with a grain of salt”, says co-organizer Amir Minerbi, a pain scientist at the Technion — Israel Institute of Technology in Haifa. “But it is encouraging [enough] to move forward.” The trial results and data from other experiments linking fibromyalgia to gut microbes are published today in Neuron1.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Sunday, April 27, 2025

Global BYD

Paolo Gerbaudo in Phenomenal World:

Tariffs are typically used at one of two key junctures in the development of a national economy: either at the time of industrial infancy, when they are trying to cultivate fledgling national champions, or at the time of financial senility, when a country’s elites are hoping to forestall impending decline. Donald Trump’s chaotically managed trade war is a clear example of the latter. Amid the intensifying retreat of American hegemony, however, an alternative geo-economic and geopolitical arrangement is coming into view: a battery-powered globalization with Chinese characteristics. In this reordering, China is poised to be the leading actor, with green technology the driver. Its most evident manifestation is the massive international expansion of its electric vehicles (EV) industry.

The excellence of Chinese EVs, which were until recently derided by the likes of Elon Musk, is now incontrovertible. What is more, China’s tech supremacy is quickly translating into market dominance, so much so that it is now threatening to overtake other leaders not only in the EV market, but in the automotive industry as a whole. This bears seismic consequences for international economic geography.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Critique Without Reason

Jensen Suther in Sidecar:

Few scholars have done more in recent decades to preserve the legacy of Theodor Adorno than Peter Gordon. An intellectual historian at Harvard, Gordon first rose to prominence in the 2000s with his prize-winning works on the affinities between Heidegger and Rosenzweig and the Heidegger–Cassirer debate. These were followed by Adorno and Existence (2016), in which Gordon set out to recover Adorno’s forceful critique of Heidegger, and existentialism more broadly, as a form of anti-rationalist metaphysics rooted in late-capitalist alienation. In his recent writings, including his introduction to the new edition of The Authoritarian Personality, Gordon makes the case for the continued relevance of the Frankfurt School’s analysis of totalitarianism, bringing it to bear on the rise of the contemporary far right. Yet his chief contribution arguably lies in his careful, systematic reconstruction of Adorno’s peculiar form of materialism – which is said to underpin his conception of the ‘good life’.

If the aim of Adorno and Existence was to highlight the ‘negative’ dimension of Adorno’s project – his critical interrogation of existentialism – then the central ambition of Gordon’s new book, A Precarious Happiness: Adorno and the Sources of Normativity, is to recover the positive, normative dimension of his theory of modernity. For Gordon, Adorno not only offers a scathing account of how the modern bourgeois form of life has failed; he also ‘measures that failure against a maximalist demand for happiness or human flourishing’.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

The War on the Liberal Class

David Klion in The Ideas Letter:

Liberalism has never been merely a set of abstract ideas, and it has never been uniformly experienced within the liberal polity. As Antonio Gramsci observed, cultural hegemony allows the bourgeoisie to maintain its dominant position in society by creating a broad social consensus around its own norms and values, and very often those norms and values have been liberal. Liberalism has always been the ideology of a particular socioeconomic stratum: from the Parisian haute bourgeoisie that declared the Rights of Man in the late 18th century to the New Class of college-educated intellectuals, professionals, and creatives that by the 1970s had come to dominate liberalism in the United States—at least according to its many critics. James Burnham anticipated capitalism’s managerial turn as early as 1941. Christopher Lasch, in his posthumously published 1995 book The Revolt of the Elites and the Betrayal of Democracy, criticized upper-middle-class groups as having alienated themselves materially and culturally from the rest of the population, describing them as “a new class only in the sense that their livelihoods rest not so much on ownership of property as on the manipulation of information and professional expertise.” The right-wing ideologue Curtis Yarvin, a court favorite of Vice President J.D. Vance and the Silicon Valley oligarch Marc Andreessen, calls this cohort “the cathedral.” Nate Silver has dubbed it “the Village.” Musa al-Gharbi, who recently responded in The Ideas Letter to a critical review of his book We Have Never Been Woke: The Cultural Contradictions of a New Elite, has described approximately the same group as “symbolic capitalists—professionals who work in fields like finance, consulting, law, HR, education, media, science and technology.” Less hostile observers might simply say “the establishment” or “liberal civil society” or, as Barbara and John Ehrenreich put it in 1977, “the professional-managerial class.”

It is a version of this class that lives and breathes liberalism and forms its core constituency in any given place and time. And it is this class that is under sustained assault from all directions right now, with both corporate capital and much of the lumpenproletariat targeting its prevailing fashions (often cast as “wokeness”) and the rights (media and academic freedom, the rule of law) that undergird the material basis of its influence (government bureaucracies, elite universities, publishing houses, legacy newspapers and magazines, the entertainment industry). Across many countries, the authority and autonomy of the liberal class is being challenged and undermined; on every front, the liberal class faces precarity, professional frustration, and ambient despair over the state of the culture

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

The Sameness of Different Things

Benjamin Kunkel in Harper’s Magazine:

Let us approach Capital as naïvely as possible, while admitting that in the case of Capital this decision can hardly be anything but a ruse. The ruseful naïveté I have in mind will consist in our pretending not to have any extratextual information about the book—­in particular, information about the enormous literature of partisan commentary that has grown up around Marx’s analysis of capitalism or about the international Communist movement that took Capital for its warrant.

The paragraph above copies almost word for word the first sentences of “Against Ulysses,” a 1988 essay by the critic Leo Bersani about another book whose reputation almost ruinously precedes it, namely Joyce’s novel about a June day in Dublin. Such helpless plagiarism on my part (turns out I couldn’t imagine a naïve or innocent reading of Capital without recalling Bersani’s similar gambit) should by itself imply how hard it is to achieve true naïveté in the face of an exceptionally famous book. Already it was more than 140 years ago that an old man named Karl Marx and an infant baptized James Augustine Joyce shared the air for some thirteen months, and by now all the endless discussion of the notorious books that these writers produced means that any attempt to read them in a spirit of innocence smacks of too much experience. I was just a kid when I first heard of Das Kapital, evidently such a sinister title that, like Mein Kampf, it could only be uttered in German. Most people have been hearing about Marx and Marxism forever; even Donald Trump, whom no one would suspect of having read Capital, routinely castigates his opponents as Marxists.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.