Notes From The Progress Studies Conference

Scott Alexander at Astral Codex Ten:

Tyler Cowen is an economics professor and blogger at Marginal Revolution. Patrick Collison is the billionaire founder of the online payments company Stripe. In 2019, they wrote an article calling for a discipline of Progress Studies, which would figure out what progress was and how to increase it. Later that year, tech entrepreneur Jason Crawford stepped up to spearhead the effort.

The immediate reaction was mostly negative. There were the usual gripes that “progress” was problematic because it could imply that some cultures/times/places/ideas were better than others. But there were also more specific objections: weren’t historians already studying progress? Wasn’t business academia already studying innovation? Are you really allowed to just invent a new field every time you think of something it would be cool to study?

It seems like you are. Five years later, Progress Studies has grown enough to hold its first conference. I got to attend, and it was great.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Realistically, how much damage could Trump do to the U.S. economy?

Noah Smith at Noahpinion:

Twenty-three Nobel-winning economists just signed a letter saying that Trump’s economic policies would be bad for the country. Some excerpts:

While each of us has different views on the particulars of various economic policies, we believe that, overall, Harris’s economic agenda will improve our nation’s health, investment, sustainability, resilience, employment opportunities, and fairness and be vastly superior to the counterproductive economic agenda of Donald Trump.

His policies, including high tariffs even on goods from our friends and allies and regressive tax cuts for corporations and individuals, will lead to higher prices, larger deficits, and greater inequality…By contrast, Harris has emphasized policies that strengthen the middle class, enhance competition, and promote entrepreneurship. On issue after issue, Harris’s economic agenda will do far more than Donald Trump’s to increase the economic strength and well-being of our nation and its people.

Simply put, Harris’s policies will result in a stronger economic performance, with economic growth that is more robust, more sustainable, and more equitable.

I don’t have quite as much confidence in Harris’ economic policy program as these top economists do — I’m worried about the amount of debt it would incur — but she definitely does want to promote entrepreneurship and enhance competition. And I would expect her to continue Biden’s industrial policies, which (as regular readers all know) I am a huge fan of.

When it comes to the dangers of Trump’s policy program, I’m pretty much in complete agreement with what the economists say here. But I think it’s useful to lay out what I think the risks of these policies are, and which ones we should be especially worried about.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Animals’ Understanding of Death Can Teach Us About Our Own

Susana Monso in Time Magazine:

In 2018, field researchers in Uganda came across an unusual sight: a female chimpanzee carried an infant that she had recently given birth to, and which was affected by albinism, an extremely uncommon condition in this species that gives their fur a striking white color. Chimpanzee mothers often remove themselves from the group to give birth, which protects their babies from the infanticides that are sadly frequent in this species. The researchers seemed to have caught this mother on her return to the group. Sure enough, they were soon able to document the reactions of her mates when they first encountered the infant and his distinctive look.

The behaviors they saw were far removed from the curiosity and care that newborns tend to elicit: instead, the chimpanzees reacted with what looked like extreme fear, with their fur on end and emitting the kinds of calls that signal potentially dangerous animals, such as snakes or unknown humans. Shortly after, violence ensued, and the alpha male together with a few of his allies killed and dismembered the little one. Upon his death, the behavior of the chimpanzees radically changed, and the apes, overtaken by curiosity, began to investigate the corpse: sniffing it, poking it, tugging at its fur and comparing it to their own, entranced by this being who smelled like a chimp but looked so different.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Thursday Poem

Traffic Stop

The officer asked, Do you know why
I pulled you over? So I tried to explain about the correlation
between an unhappy childhood and the need

to pull, about how Elon Musk invented Teslas
because we’re all characters
in Grand Theft Auto, about needing to outrun

my future, but he wanted to see my license and registration
so I pointed at his chest with my gold finger (in the shape of a gun)
showed him the Valentine’s cards stuffed in my glovebox

handed him a snapshot of my border collie at the beach
because a badge needs a quota like a chew toy
needs a puppy, but he asked me to step

out of the car, put the world in a backwards spell,
touch my eyes with my nose
closed, so I put on my blue

shoes, walked heel to toe,
cartwheeled for the crowd, asked
if he could share his body-

cam video on my wall, which is to say I promised
to donate a kidney for the Policeman’s Ball, which is to say I signed
his autograph book

and as he rolled away, the radio played,
there will be an answer, let it be, let it be.

by Pankaj Khemka
from Tribute to Indian Poets
Rattle Magazine #73, Fall 2021

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

The Ontology of Social Norms

Kevin Richardson at Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews:

It is incredibly difficult to say something new about social norms. The question “What is a social norm?” has been given many detailed answers by philosophers and social scientists. Social norms are often theorized as rules of some kind; most of the ensuing literature concerns the nature of such rules and how they are established or maintained. Despite the mountain of literature on social norms, Charlotte Witt’s Social Goodness not only makes an original contribution to the literature, but it also does so in a way that points toward important, underexplored regions of conceptual space.

The traditional philosophical question about social norms is: what is a social norm? In Social Goodness, Witt asks a different question: what is the source of social normativity? Alternatively put: what makes social norms binding on us? Witt specifically investigates what she calls social role norms. Teachers ought to teach. Students ought to do their homework. Parents ought to take care of their children. In each case, we have a norm that follows from a social role (teacher, student, parent).

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Wednesday, October 23, 2024

Fear And Loathing In Faulkner Country

Jennie Lightweis-Goff at The Point:

College towns are a little like Vegas. They’re fallen capitals, scourged by development and game-day apartments. The boomer professors got there and built the Museum of the American Rebel; soon after, they withered into Cadaver Bohemias. The Godfather, the department chair who hired me in 2016, was nonetheless confident that I’d assimilate to the sprawling “family” he had helped build there. “Faculty regard Oxford as a suburb of New Orleans,” he told me, referring to the city where I’d lived for more than a decade. “So it won’t be too much of a change.” It was an amiable conversation, in which he assured me he’d hired his first choices for the two posts they’d needed: me as an instructor, and the Superstar writer-in-residence, a bestselling novelist and infamous Twitter provocateur.

On the first day of my visit, I heard someone call Oxford “the Little Easy”; no one has said it to me since. To be fair, I’ve never heard its referent—the Big Easy—used in conversation down South in New Orleans, and I don’t think anyone calls Oxford “the Velvet Ditch,” its alleged nickname, without well-earned embarrassment.

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Why is academic writing so boring?

Samantha Laine Perfas interviews Leonard Cassuto in The Harvard Gazette:

You start your book by pointing out that all academic writers begin their careers writing for one person: their teacher. Why does that create problems?

This is the primal scene of academic writing: some student writing some paper for some teacher someplace. It happens again and again and is the process by which we are socialized into the community of academic writers.

The distinguishing feature of that primal scene is one that I think gets very little attention, namely that the reader (in this case the teacher) is being paid. You grow up as a writer where your audience is one who can never be bored or discouraged because they’re being paid to read to the end of it. You’re learning in some sense that the reader doesn’t matter that much and that they’re going to be with you no matter what.

This is inevitably the root of many potential bad habits, which can burst into flower as writers become more and more advanced.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Pull-Up Diary

Mitchell Morgan Johnson at The Paris Review:

Went back to the gym after ten days out of town. On vacation in Oregon, with my family, I didn’t work out a single time. On the plane home, I watched an episode of Succession with Alexander Skarsgård in it and thought, I’d like to look like him. He probably works out even when he’s on vacation. But he’s rich, of course, and likely does other extreme things like steroids and blending chicken into smoothies. Still I would like to look more like Alexander Skarsgård than I currently do. I’m 6’3, almost his height, but far skinnier.

Today I felt weaker than before the trip, but maybe that was in my head. I set the assisted pull-up machine to sixty pounds and could complete only four before my arms gave out. I moved on, humbled, to the leg press. I’ve googled “how to do a pull-up” a few times, which has inspired Instagram to start showing me Reels about it. One man with shoulders like cantaloupes explains proper technique. Arms no narrower than shoulder width, he says. You don’t want your body just dangling loosely in space.

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Sean Carroll’s Mindscape Podcast: Doyne Farmer on Chaos, Crashes, and Economic Complexity

Sean Carroll at Preposterous Universe:

A large economy is one of the best examples we have of complex dynamics. There are multiple components arranged in complicated overlapping hierarchies, out-of-equilibrium dynamics, nonlinear coupling and feedback between different levels, and ubiquitous unpredictable and chaotic behavior. Nevertheless, many economic models are based on relatively simple equilibrium principles. Doyne Farmer is among a group who think that economists need to start taking the tools of complexity theory seriously, as he argues in his recent book Making Sense of Chaos: A Better Economics for a Better World.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

The High Costs of the For-Profit American Healthcare System

From Literary Hub:

For the next few weeks, Literary Hub will be going beyond the memes for an in-depth look at the everyday issues affecting Americans as they head to the polls on November 5th. Each week at Lit Hub we’ll be featuring reading lists, essays, and interviews on important topics like Income Inequality, Climate Justice, LGBTQ Rights, Reproductive Rights, and more. For a better handle on the issues affecting you and your loved ones—regardless of who ends up president on November 6th (or 7th, or 8th, or whenever)—stay tuned to LitHub.com in October. Read parts one and two, Income Inequality, and The Importance of Labor.

Today we’ve gathered the best stories published at Lit Hub about one of the most important issues affecting Americans: the high costs (literal and figurative) of America’s for-profit approach to healthcare. With an introduction, below, from Maris Kreizman.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

A letter to my friend Hanif Kureishi after the terrible accident that changed his life forever

Robert McCrum in The Independent:

Dear Hanif,

You and I have been friends and sparring partners in the beaten way of the London book, theatre and media world for about half a lifetime – more than 40 years. At Faber’s in the 1980s, I published quite a bit of your early work (notably The Rainbow SignMy Beautiful LaundretteThe Buddha of Suburbia and The Black Album).

So when I heard, just after Christmas two years ago, that you’d fallen badly in Rome and been taken into intensive care with a broken neck, severe paralysis, and had almost died (there were many rumours: none of the stories about you were exactly the same), I was stunned and distressed.

When, finally, I was able to visit you in the Stanmore rehab centre on your return to the UK, you were already a veteran of many months of neuro-physiotherapy, acclimatising to a weird new world of disability. Possibly, I was more concerned on your behalf than some of your circle. As someone who is a long-term survivor of a stroke (in 1995), I know all about the brain injuries that induce paralysis, and the struggles, inner and outer, involved in getting back to health. I also understood, in my own way, the dreadful severity of your plight as a tetraplegic – in your words, “like a Beckett character”. At any age, the reminder that we live in our bodies can be a personal apocalypse, and a shock that many don’t get over.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

The US is the world’s science superpower — but for how long?

From Nature:

Science in the United States has never been stronger by most measures.

Over the past five years, the nation has won more scientific Nobel prizes than the rest of the world combined — in line with its domination of the prizes since the middle of the twentieth century. In 2020, two US drug companies spearheaded the development of vaccines that helped to contain a pandemic. Two years later, a California start-up firm released the revolutionary artificial-intelligence (AI) tool ChatGPT and a national laboratory broke a fundamental barrier in nuclear fusion.

This year, the United States is on track to spend US$1 trillion on research and development (R&D), much more than any other country. And its labs are a magnet for researchers from around the globe, with workers born in other nations accounting for 43% of doctorate-holders in the US workforce in science, technology, engineering and medicine (STEM).

But as voters go to the polls in November to elect a new president and Congress, some scientific leaders worry that the nation is ceding ground to other research powerhouses, notably China, which is already outpacing the United States on many of the leading science metrics. “US science is perceived to be — and is — losing the race for global STEM leadership,” said Marcia McNutt, president of the US National Academy of Sciences in Washington DC, in a speech in June.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Wednesday Poem

The Keeper of Sheep

—excerpt

I don’t believe in God because I’ve never seen him.
If he wanted me to believe in him,
He would doubtless come and talk to me
and walk in through my front door
Saying, Here I am!
(This may sound ridiculous to the ears
Of someone who, because he doesn’t know what it is to look at things,
Doesn’t understand someone who speaks of them
In the way that noticing things teaches us.)

But if God is the flowers and the trees
And hills and the sun and the moonlight,
Then I do believe in him,
I believe in him at all hours,
And my whole life is one long prayer and mass,
And a communion with the eyes and ears.

But if God is the trees and the flowers
And the hills and the moonlight and the sun,
Why do I call him God?

I call him flowers and trees and hills and sun and moonlight;
Because if, so that I might see him, he made himself
Sun and moonlight and flowers and trees and hills,
If he appears to me as trees and hills
And moonlight and sun and flowers,
It’s because he wants me to know him
As trees and hills and flowers and moonlight and sun.

And that’s why I obey him
(What more do I know of God than God knows of himself?),
I obey him, living spontaneously,
Like someone opening his eyes and seeing,
And I call him moonlight and sun and flowers and trees and hills,
And I love him without thinking about him,
And I think him by seeing and hearing,
And I walk with him at all hours.

by Fernando Pessoa
from
The Complete Works of Alberto Caeiro
New Directions Books, 2020

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Tuesday, October 22, 2024

Why Han Kang’s Nobel Matters

Yung In Chae at The Yale Review:

On October 10, 2024—the day after Hangeul Day, which celebrates the invention of the Korean alphabet—I and millions of other Koreans were able to do something we had never been able to do before: read a novel by a Nobel Prize laureate in our native language.

And what extraordinary grace that the laureate should be Han Kang. Last year, I had the honor of interviewing Han about Deborah Smith and e. yaewon’s English translation of her novel Greek Lessons. We became friends who now meet up whenever I’m in Seoul, and I can testify that she embodies in real life the gentleness she demonstrates in her books. Beyond her individual worthiness, it is significant that South Korea’s two laureates—former president Kim Dae-jung received the Peace Prize in 2000—have both led careers shaped by the long fight for democratization. For decades, conservatives have denied or dismissed the Gwangju Uprising, the atrocity in which the military dictator Chun Doo-hwan killed hundreds of pro-democracy protesters, and wounded or maimed thousands more. Because of Han’s Nobel win, more of the world will know that it not only happened, but also that it continues to matter.

The Gwangju Massacre is central to Han’s magnum opus, Human Acts—a harrowing and clear-eyed yet somehow tender look at the weeks-long uprising against Chun that began on May 18, 1980, resulting in exorbitant death and enduring collective trauma. The novel also means a great deal to me personally: For as long as I can remember, my mother, who is four years older than Han, has resisted thinking about life under Chun in the 1980s, so much so that she avoids TV shows and movies set in that decade.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.