How to Meet the Girl with Kaleidoscope Eyes

Jeannette Cooperman in The Common Reader:

Psychedelics were demonized, research was shut down, and mushrooms went underground. Their appeal lingered. I came of age at the end of the next decade, and while other drugs scared me, psilocybin always seemed like something that, someday, I might try. The prospect of a mystical state softened the sense of scary transgression, the warnings about nightmarish trips. Nibbling a magic mushroom sounded far more appealing than swallowing blotter paper soaked in acid.

Though I fancied myself Alice, no one appeared with a silver tray of ’shrooms. Years passed. Then I read about research at my own university and sat bolt upright. Emailed the principal researchers. Begged for interviews and dropped heavy hints about volunteering for their next study.

Meanwhile, maybe I could figure out the magic.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Sean Carroll’s Mindscape Podcast: Petter Törnberg on the Dynamics of (Mis)Information

Sean Carroll at Preposterous Universe:

A characteristic of complex systems is that individual components combine to exhibit large-scale emergent behavior even when the components were not specifically designed for any particular purpose within the collective. Sometimes those individual components are us — people interacting within societies or online communities. Studying the dynamics of such interactions is interesting both to better understand what is happening, and hopefully to designing better communities. I talk with Petter Törnberg about flows of information, how polarization develops, and how artificial agents can help steer things in better directions.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Mamdani’s New Birth of Freedom

Corey Robin at his own website:

Azra Raza with Zohran Mamdani

Zohran Mamdani is running now against Andrew Cuomo, a corrupt sexual harasser, who has been aided from the start by Donald Trump. Donald Trump is a corrupt sexual harasser who never met a law he didn’t want to break. Through pressure from Trump and Billy Ackman and a combination of real estate developers, financiers, pro-Israel forces, Cuomo is now being helped by the stepping down of Eric Adams, another corrupt politician whose bacon was saved only when Trump forced lower-tier federal prosecutors to drop the government’s corruption case against Adams in return for Adams’ helping Trump pursue his illegal and unconstitutional plan to deport immigrants.

Notice what Zohran, already blessed with so many political gifts, has going for him here. Not only is he completely untainted by corruption. He’s never broken the law. He’s as clean as a whistle.

There was a time when that wouldn’t have been remarkable. We’ve reached a moment in our political development when it is. What’s more, that steadfast legality and sense of lawfulness belongs to a democratic socialist, a critic of Israel, a man who wants to freeze the rent, make buses free and fast, childcare universal, and life in New York affordable.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Suzanne Duchamp Gets a Museum Retrospective, Finally

Andrew Russeth at Artnet:

Duchamp did leave behind some gnomic quips—“Intrinsic value has a greater density than relative value” (I don’t know what that means)—and some crisp writing. In a poem about Crotti, she declared, “He believes in everything—accepts everything—denies everything—sells 60 cylinder cars—loses and wins—makes games and invents reasons for living.” Another intriguing fact: Her compatriots adored her. Writing under a pseudonym, Picabia declared, “Suzanne Duchamp does more intelligent things than paint.” There can be no higher praise from him.

Was Duchamp a major artist? Her work mocks such a question. She made a few stunners—Dadaist riddles—and then proceeded to do as she pleased. Today, as artists are pressured to articulate their thinking, to please the market and to perform for curators, she models a different approach. In 1926, an interviewer asked her to explain her practice. Her reply was direct: “Why does one want to explain everything?”

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Raymond Geuss, Seeing Double

Espen Hammer at Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews:

While on paper an obvious insider, Raymond Geuss has for decades been criticizing contemporary philosophy as though he were an outsider, viewing it as an intellectually limiting practice too occupied with academically narrow, self-generated problems. He performs this critique with an eye to the past, returning often to canonical or more peripheral figures from the history not only of philosophy but adjacent fields such as literature and classics; accordingly, he aspires to occupy the position of the interdisciplinary critic and interpreter, highlighting exemplary achievements that inspire a more inclusive approach to philosophy.

To be sure, Geuss is also known for his cutting remarks on philosophers and politicians whose judgments depend on a commitment to some unifying principle that, in his view, tends to misrepresent our standing in the world. Moral and political ‘rule-first’ normativists, such as Kant, Rawls, and Habermas, and power politicians prone to speak in the name of pretentious moral ideals, such as Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair, have been the targets of some rather scathing treatment. If anything, Geuss’s impulse has always been nominalist, prioritizing particulars over generalities, perspectivism over objectivism, and to couch that within an equally decisive measure of realism.

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Thursday Poem

…..After He Left

When the children were small and sleeping,
the night warm and raining,

I would go out to a place under the broken
eaves. Naked, yes. And standing under,

wash my hair with rain and the dark of night.
I could hear cars on the other side

of the duplex. I could smell the sheets
upstairs. I still couldn’t touch anything

labeled future. Lonely in the rain,
the spirit is beautiful. It can marry

the heart for no one to see. As I said,
I washed my hair under the broken rain,

and stood there in the night, glistening.

by Jeanie Tomasko
from
Rattle Magazine #4- 20/14

 

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Jane Goodall’s legacy: three ways she changed science

From Nature:

Jane Goodall, a British primatologist known for her work with chimpanzees, died on Wednesday 1 October, aged 91. She was in California on a speaking tour and died of natural causes, according to the Jane Goodall Institute.

Goodall is best known for her work with chimpanzees in Gombe National Park in Tanzania. She was the first to discover that chimpanzees made and used tools1. She went on to become an advocate for conservation, human rights and animal welfare, including stopping the use of animals in medical research. She established the Jane Goodall Institute, a non-profit wildlife and conservation organization in Washington DC, in 1977.

Here are the ways in which Goodall’s legacy will endure.

Humanizing primates

While studying for her PhD at the University of Cambridge, UK, in the early 1960s, Goodall broke with the scientific convention of using numbers to identify animals, assigning them names instead. She named a male chimp with silver facial hair David Greybeard. This change upset senior scientists at the time, but it is now common practice to use animal names.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Wednesday, October 1, 2025

On The Art Of Ibrahim Mahama

Born in Tamale and primarily raised in Accra, Mahama chose to base his art studio, Red Clay, in the provincial city rather than in the nation’s capital. Tamale, an important trading hub in northern Ghana, is known for its fugu clothing, a type of smock with roots in the Malian and Songhai empires. Over the centuries, Muslim traders built mosques and schools in sedate Tamale, which was more inland and distant from the direct links of the transatlantic slave and colonial trade. By contrast, Accra, the nation’s capital, with its Parliamentary Building and Black Star Square, is enlivened by streams of mellow banter and commerce. The city’s nocturnal activity creates an electric pulse. Pentecostal revival meeting lights and condominium-sale advertisements illuminate the city, leaving a ruddy glow along the highway. Although both Accra and Tamale have influenced Mahama’s work insofar as he draws from the capital’s marketplace and the provincial city’s scrap metal, his talent emerged against the broader backdrop of the postindependence promise of industrialization and its failure to deliver prosperity to most Ghanaians. Mahama’s installations, which say something about societal deterioration, also dramatize the country’s inability to sustain robust funding in the arts or technology in its postindependence years.

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Days of Awe

Robert Zaretsky at The American Scholar:

“The Days of Awe are coming.” Rather than a tagline for a Netflix series modeled on Game of Thrones, the phrase is the literal translation of Yamim Nora’im, or Jewish High Holidays. These awesome days begin with Rosh Hashanah on September 22 and reach a crescendo with Yom Kippur on October.

As a freshly minted man by the grace of a bar mitzvah, I cowered from the awe inspired by the fierce god who, Moses reminds the Israelites in Deuteronomy, spoke to them, unseen, through fire. “The gate between heaven and earth cracks open,” I was reminded, and “the Book of Life and the Book of Death are opened once again, and your name is written in one of them.”

Words chiseled on tablets in the mists of the distant past seem to carry greater weight than do words appearing on screens today. And yet, even though I am no longer an observant Jew, I am still filled with a kind of dread when the Days of Awe approach. They remind me, I imagine, of the fragility, ephemerality, and sheer contingency of our lives. Hardly surprising, then, that both “fear” and “awe” are encompassed by one word in Hebrew, yirah.

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Young Almodóvar Versus Old Almodóvar in the World Series of Love

Cassandra Neyenesch at Public Books:

Martha, a journalist played by Tilda Swinton, has terminal cancer. She asks her friend Ingrid (Julianne Moore) to come away with her to a house in upstate New York and be in the room next door when she takes a suicide pill she bought on the dark web. Like all of Pedro Almodóvar’s films, The Room Next Door is gorgeous to look at, completely unsentimental, and staunchly uninterested in absolutes, rules, or dogmas. This is Almodóvar’s gift: moral gray tones painted in vibrant colors. When Martha says the gangster line, “Cancer can’t get me if I get me first,” we sense that it’s an expression of Almodóvar’s own defiant punk spirit.

Almodóvar is an artist of eros, in the sense that the dynamics between the characters tend to escalate into sex, not infrequently rape. The director is sex obsessed, but in earlier films like Talk to Her and Tie Me Up! Tie Me Down! he also uses sex to provoke discomfort, disgust, and titillation in the viewer. It works because he himself is a siren, and he is seducing us. His movies are so ravishing and hilarious that we find ourselves helpless to patrol our boundaries, and we just give in to their transgressive spell.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

AIs have quietly crossed a threshold: they can now perform real, economically relevant work

Ethan Mollick at One Useful Thing:

Last week, OpenAI released a new test of AI ability, but this one differs from the usual benchmarks built around math or trivia. For this test, OpenAI gathered experts with an average of 14 years of experience in industries ranging from finance to law to retail and had them design realistic tasks that would take human experts an average of four to seven hours to complete (you can see all the tasks here). OpenAI then had both AI and other experts do the tasks themselves. A third group of experts graded the results, not knowing which answers came from the AI and which from the human, a process which took about an hour per question.

Human experts won, but barely, and the margins varied dramatically by industry. Yet AI is improving fast, with more recent AI models scoring much higher than older ones. Interestingly, the major reason for AI losing to humans was not hallucinations and errors, but a failure to format results well or follow instructions exactly — areas of rapid improvement. If the current patterns hold, the next generation of AI models should beat human experts on average in this test. Does that mean AI is ready to replace human jobs?

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

The UN: Davos for Diplomats

Richard Haass at Project Syndicate:

Five years ago, I wrote a commentary about the United Nations as it turned 75. The title, “The UN’s Unhappy Birthday,” said it all. The UN is now 80, but my critique back then remains all too valid today. The UN’s slide into near-irrelevance continues unabated.

The annual September gathering of world leaders in New York, which has just ended, is less important for what the UN does (which is little in the realm of preventing or ending wars) than for what it provides, namely a venue for all sorts of bilateral and multilateral meetings among the high-level visitors. Think of it as Davos for diplomats.

But the UN itself is a victim of chronic malaise, owing above all to the resurgence of great-power rivalry. The state of international affairs today is a far cry from what it was in 1990 when the world came together through the UN in the aftermath of Iraq’s invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Wednesday Poem

In Broken Images

He is quick, thinking in clear images;
I am slow, thinking in broken images.

He becomes dull, trusting to his clear images;
I become sharp, mistrusting my broken images.

Trusting his images, he assumes their relevance;
Mistrusting my images, I question their relevance.

Assuming their relevance, he assumes the fact.
Questioning their relevance, I question the fact.

When the fact fails him, he questions his senses;
When the fact fails me, I approve my senses.

He continues quick and dull in his clear images;
I continue slow and sharp in my broken images.

He in a new confusion of his understanding;
I in a new understanding of my confusion.

Robert Graves,
from To Read a Poem
by Donald Hall
Harcourt Brace, 1992


Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Two Years After Cormac McCarthy’s Death, Rare Access to His Personal Library Reveals the Man Behind the Myth

Richard Grant in Smithsonian:

Cormac McCarthy, one of the greatest novelists America has ever produced and one of the most private, had been dead for 13 months when I arrived at his final residence outside Santa Fe, New Mexico. It was a stately old adobe house, two stories high with beam-ends jutting out of the exterior walls, set back from a country road in a valley below the mountains. First built in 1892, the house was expanded and modernized in the 1970s and extensively modified by McCarthy himself, who, it turns out, was a self-taught architect as well as a master of literary fiction.

I was invited to the house by two McCarthy scholars who were embroiled in a herculean endeavor. Working unpaid, with help from other volunteer scholars and occasional graduate students, they had taken it upon themselves to physically examine and digitally catalog every single book in McCarthy’s enormous and chaotically disorganized personal library. They were guessing it contained upwards of 20,000 volumes. By comparison, Ernest Hemingway, considered a voracious book collector, left behind a personal library of 9,000.

What makes McCarthy’s library so intriguing is not just its size, nor the fact that very few people know about it. His books, many of which are annotated with margin comments, promise to reveal far more about this elusive literary giant than the few cagey interviews he gave when he was alive. For as long as people have been reading McCarthy, they have speculated about which books and authors informed and inspired his work, a subject he was loath to discuss. They have wondered about his interests and true personality because all he presented to the public was a reclusive, austere, inscrutable facade.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

How Circulating Tumor Cells Can Help Diagnose Cancer Early

Rebecca Roberts in The Scientist:

Circulating tumor cells were first described in 1869 by Thomas Ashworth, an Australian pathologist who observed them in a peripheral blood sample taken from a patient with metastatic cancer.1 They have since been detected in a range of tumor types, including breast, prostate, colorectal, ovarian, lung, liver, gastric, and pancreatic cancers, as well as melanoma.2

Researchers and clinicians can use circulating tumor cells to study cancer in a non-invasive way, gaining valuable insights into the biology of tumors. In this article, we explore what these cells are, the challenges associated with studying them, and how they enable scientists to diagnose cancer early, predict clinical outcomes, understand metastasis, monitor the efficacy of treatments, and develop personalized medicines.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.