Transformative Experience and Pascal’s Wager

by Joseph Shieber One of the most famous philosophical arguments is Pascal’s Wager, an attempt by the 17th century French mathematician and philosopher Blaise Pascal to provide ammunition for religious believers in their struggles against nonbelief. The Wager works like this. First, there are two possible states of affairs that you’re to consider: either God…

Critique of Pure Nonsense: A Case Study in The Vacuousness of Contemporary Conservative Commentary on Critical Race Theory

by Joseph Shieber I first became aware of the historian Allen Guelzo’s work due to a mention in a recent newspaper column — just not the mention that, if you’re active on Twitter (and particularly philosophy Twitter), you might be expecting. In a glowing review in the Washington Post, George Will praised Guelzo’s new biography…

The Roots of Wittgenstein’s “Anthropological” Philosophical Perspective

by Joseph Shieber One of the pleasures of reading Amartya Sen’s new memoir, Home in the World, is stumbling upon little anecdotes that provide new perspectives on, or an opportunity for a deepening engagement with, major intellectual figures. One such occasion for me was Sen’s discussion of the influence of the economist Piero Sraffa, one…

What Should We Learn From Philosophy’s Neglect of the History of Ideas?

by Joseph Shieber The philosophical world has recently been abuzz about Susanne Bobzien’s argument that Gottlob Frege — often taken to be one of the founding figures of what became 20th century analytic philosophy — plagiarized many of his logical positions from the Stoics. Bobzien’s charge isn’t merely idle speculation. In her paper, descriptively titled “Frege Plagiarized the Stoics”,…