by Kyle Munkittrick

Two types of people are very worried about global fertility — social conservatives and Silicon Valley weirdos. I have the rare privilege of having been both at one point in my life, neither at the same time, and, how apropos, I also have training in bioethics. This is my moment.
Pro-natalists want more babies. They argue that total fertility rates being below replacement level is really bad. They’re very probably right. Unfortunately, the conservatives and weirdos not only almost perfectly oppose and cancel out each other, but are also tying their own rhetorical shoelaces together.
The problem of low fertility is a combination of social and technological barriers. Social conservatives tend to want social solutions and oppose technological ones. The Silicon Valley weirdos tend to want the technological solutions and oppose the social options. Combined, both groups end up failing to convince each other and skeptical normies. Who needs anti-natalists when you’ve got pro-natalists like these?
As a result most normal people think the solution fertility problem is obvious. They are wrong. If you think it’s obvious, read Dr. Alice Evan’s interview with Ross Douthat, her blog on Substack, or these threads by @StatisticUrban. If it’s not obvious, what are the probable causes? Read more »
