Two Pigeons
Mary Jo SalterThey’ve perched for hours
on that window-ledge, scarcely
moving. Beak to beak,a matched set, they differ
almost imperceptibly —
like salt and pepper shakers.It’s an event when they tuck
(simultaneously) their pinpoint
heads into lavender vestsof fat. But reminiscent
of clock hands blandly
turning because they musthave turned—somehow, they’ve
taken on the grave,
small-eyed aspect of monkshooded in conferences
so intimate nothing need
be said. If some are chucklingin the park, earning
their bread, these are content
to let the dark engulf them—it’s all the human
imagination can fathom,
how single-mindedlymindless two silhouettes
stand in a window thick
as milk glass. They appearnever to have fed on
anything else when they stir
all of a sudden to pecksavagely, for love
or hygiene, at the grimy
feathers of the other;but when they resume
their places, the shift
is one only a painteror a barber (prodding a chin
back into position)
would be likely to notice.
James Longenbach at NYT:
Mary Jo Salter came of age as a poet in the 1970s when two tribes, the Language poets and the New Formalists, were sparring. The Language poets (named after a magazine called Language) represented a new surge of experimental writing, while the New Formalists (with whom Salter was associated) wanted to resist the influence of modernism, re-energizing poetry’s relationship not only to traditional form but to narrative. Like Salter, many of the New Formalists modeled their work on a strategically narrowed version of Elizabeth Bishop, a poet who wrote both free and formal verse with homespun virtuosity. But while Bishop continues to be read, the polemics associated with both the New Formalism and Language poetry feel dated, part of the niggling history of taste rather than the grand history of art.
More.