The Issue with Living Longer

Frank Diana in Time Magazine:

We’re living longer than ever—but those extra years aren’t unfolding the way many hoped. Instead of later years spent thriving, millions are instead facing chronic illnesscognitive decline, and financial strain.

As of July 2025, the estimated global average life expectancy is approximately 73.5 years. This represents a slight increase from previous years, continuing a long-term trend of rising longevity (despite a temporary dip due to the COVID-19 pandemic). High-income countries with advanced healthcare systems, good sanitation, and healthy lifestyles have an even longer life expectancy average, reaching up to 84 years. Our lifespans have expanded, but our healthspans—the number of years we live with mental sharpness, physical independence, and emotional well-being—has not kept pace. If we don’t prepare now, the result won’t just be personal hardship. It will reshape families, erode legacies, and overwhelm the caregiving systems we all depend on.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Sunday, July 20, 2025

A Green Cold War

Ilias Alami in The Breakdown:

“We will not accept a new Cold War between the United States and China”, Brazil’s President Lula da Silva declared in his victory speech in October 2022, “we will have relations with everyone.” It is a sentiment echoed by leaders across the Global South. “Malaysia’s position is clear”, announced the country’s prime minister, Anwar Ibrahim, earlier this year to an international audience of policymakers, business leaders and diplomats. “The country remains non-aligned and will not be dragged into any global power rivalries.”

This is a strategic sentiment shared by a growing group of nations: the pursuit of what some scholars have termed “polyalignment.” Increasingly, developing countries refuse to fall in line with one of Beijing, Washington, or Brussels. Instead, they are forcefully asserting their rights to develop trade, investment and security partnerships with whoever they wish. In doing so, they are drawing on the principles, symbols and rhetoric of the Non-Aligned Movement, the coalition of Third World countries who, during the First Cold War, chose to join neither the US nor the rival Soviet geopolitical blocs.

As Kenyan president William Ruto stated last year in response to a CNN journalist’s question about whether the country would choose between Chinese or US investment: “we are neither facing West nor East; we are facing forward where opportunities are”—a modern twist on the famous quote from Ghanaian leader Kwame Nkrumah, who in 1960 declared that “we face neither East nor West; we face forward.” Past histories of non-alignment clearly live through the current discourse and practice of polyalignment, informing how Southern leaders interpret and navigate today’s geopolitical rivalries, as well as the risks and opportunities available to them. In doing so, however, they highlight a sobering truth: we are now entering a new era of great power competition, a Second Cold War, whose roots lie deep in the twentieth century.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

AI, China’s Invisible Scaffolding

Jacob Dreyer in the Ideas Letter:

In these hot summer mornings, I go with my son to the park to look at swans. One day, we passed by a government-run canteen, and I stopped to pick up a snack for him. I noticed, mounted on the wall, a huge screen that captured data of the most banal kind: the patrons’ age group, the most commonly ordered dish. A high-tech control room was on display as the elderly diners ate their breakfast. I did a bit of research and discovered that this place was a pioneer project that might be going national soon. In cities across China, government-subsidized food halls for seniors use AI to optimize ingredient ordering, reduce food waste, and track nutritional data. These smart canteens, often tucked into public housing complexes or community centers, demonstrate how AI-enhanced cost-effectiveness allows the state to provide services that would once have been seen as too expensive to sustain.

In my area of Shanghai, many of the elderly are living alone in small apartments, sustained by a Chinese form of rent control. Shanghai’s infrastructure simultaneously caters to upper-middle-income families like my own, with expectations that the city is as livable London or New York, and to the elderly pensioners who skip meals to save money. As the city tries to prepare for an aging population, AI and big data are seen as the magic bullet that can help the government solve its problems.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Common Characteristics

Maria Fernanda Sikorski interviews Xiaoyang Tang in Phenomenal World:

Maria Sikorski: Outside observers have characterized the Chinese development by contrasting it to the “Washington Consensus.” However, in your writing—including your 2021 book—you challenge the notion of a singular “Beijing consensus” by introducing the idea of coevolutionary pragmatism. What does this concept tell us about China’s own history of development, and its approach to other developing nations?

Xiaoyang Tang: The Washington Consensus adopted a strict logic of causal mechanisms and attempted to generalize them—it stipulates static variables that should lead to specific results. It identifies a cause-and-effect relationship between factors such as the free market and economic growth.

The Chinese experience suggests that viewing economic development through this analysis is overly simplistic—and that culture, existing economic institutions, historical economic institutions, style of educational system, form of government, and so on, all must move together in a country’s modernization process.

I find that the concept of coevolutionary pragmatism best explains this multidimensional and interactive relationship. The form of government is not a determinant factor in economic growth; it is correlated to it. For the economy to grow, the form of government must fit its current economic conditions, and it must adapt as the economy grows. In this type of multidimensional relationship, there is no fixed model for either the government or the economic structure that leads to development. Instead, you have a pragmatic view on how to adjust different factors operating inside a broader system to seek a better functioning relationship between all of them at each stage of development. In contrast to the prescriptions of the Washington Consensus, the search for the right combination of variables will be dynamic across national contexts and across time.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

The world is choking on screens. Just as this book foretold

Ryan Zickgraf in The Washington Post:

It’s now almost a reflex: An election is held, and someone pushes the big, red Death of Democracy panic button. When Donald Trump won in 2016, liberals saw a gold-plated Adolf Hitler in a red baseball cap. Then Joe Biden took over and conservatives warned of Joseph Stalin or Pol Pot reborn, an America where your kids would be forced to go to gay camp and pray to RuPaul before lunch. (They’re panicking again with Zohran Mamdani in New York’s mayoral race.) Now, we have Trump redux. The hysterias flip, but the impulse stays the same: to imagine top-down tyranny as a looming catastrophe.

Neil Postman would know better. Forty years ago, the cultural critic wrote “Amusing Ourselves to Death,” a pessimistic yet prescient polemic worth revisiting in the age of algorithm-driven political hysteria. Postman, who died in 2003, predicted that America wasn’t trending toward existence under the boot of totalitarianism, as in George Orwell’s “1984,” but drifting through the languorous haze of a feel-good dystopia that instead resembled Aldous Huxley’s “Brave New World.” Postman was right. Democracy was in danger of being not overthrown but overentertained.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Sunday Poem

Lessons in Mathematics

My father taught me everything
except geometry. (He’d never seen it.)
Once we got beyond arithmetic,
he couldn’t help with homework.
…….
As a boy, he’d pull his rusted red wagon
down to the A&P on Harrison Avenue
and haul women’s groceries for tips.
Fridays and Saturdays were best for business—
he missed every school dance.
Still he’d whistle on the walk home
with his pockets full of nickels,
head humming with sums and interest.
…………..
Then he enlisted.
The calculus of poverty
is its own rigged lottery,
but his eyes would glisten
when he talked about the mess
at Long Binh:
the math of feeding all those mouths,
the giant bags of flour, the powdered eggs.
…….
He didn’t cook much at home—
we used to joke that he couldn’t make
pancakes for fewer than four hundred.
But after his shift at the firehouse,
if he found me awake with my books,
he’d fry up a pack of Steak-umms,
then take the lid from a pickle jar
and cut out perfect disks of white bread
for his famous “circle sandwiches.”
We’d sit in silence at the kitchen table
while we ate. I didn’t know much
about love then, but I knew the shape.

by Amy Dougher-Solórzano
from Rattle Magazine

 

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Friday, July 18, 2025

The English major is languishing, here is how it might be repaired

Shaye Herman at The Common Reader:

It is no great secret that the undergraduate English department is in a state of decline: a shrinking number of English majors, a decrease in faculty, and a reputation of unemployability and irrelevance. Much has been written about this decline. Nathan Heller’s recent New Yorker piece, “The End of the English Major,” has already managed to spark two separate New York Times opinion pieces. Like much previous writing on the topic, Heller interviewed academics and students and ended up with a familiar group of diagnoses and cures. When summarized, the discussion boils down to this:

“English departments rely too heavily on the Great Books. We need to study a more diverse group of authors.”

“No. Kids these days don’t respect the canon. This emphasis on new texts and perspectives is to the detriment of the established classics.”

“No. English suffers from a reputation problem. We must do more to battle the perception that English departments are impractical, unserious, and out of touch.”

“No. Students are focused on majors with clear paths to employment and high salaries. We must better communicate career opportunities to students. English majors can still get jobs in STEM and business fields. ”

“No. Focusing on non-humanities-based careers reinforces the idea that English is a useless degree, a sideshow to more profitable pursuits.”

“No. The actual problem is our tunnel vision on the traditional study of literature. We need to incorporate disciplines like cultural studies, media studies, and women, gender, and sexuality studies.”

“No. The increased focus on secondary disciplines and pre-professional interests is driving away students who are interested in the traditional study of English.”

I list these critiques because within the discourse—Heller’s article included—there is strikingly little mention of the literature English departments ignore: genre fiction. Genre fiction, also known as “commercial fiction” or “popular fiction,” typically falls into pre-established literary genres with their own rules and styles. Think fantasy, science fiction, crime, horror, romance, young adult, and historical fiction.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

The breakthrough proof bringing mathematics closer to a grand unified theory

Ananyo Bhattacharya in Nature:

One of the biggest stories in science is quietly playing out in the world of abstract mathematics. Over the course of last year, researchers fulfilled a decades-old dream when they unveiled a proof of the geometric Langlands conjecture — a key piece of a group of interconnected problems called the Langlands programme. The proof — a gargantuan effort — validates the intricate and far-reaching Langlands programme, which is often hailed as the grand unified theory of mathematics but remains largely unproven. Yet the work’s true impact might lie not in what it settles, but in the new avenues of inquiry it reveals.

“It’s a huge triumph. But rather than closing a door, this proof throws open a dozen others,” says David Ben-Zvi at the University of Texas at Austin, who was not involved with the work.

Proving the geometric Langlands conjecture has long been considered one of the deepest and most enigmatic pursuits in modern mathematics. Ultimately, it took a team of nine mathematicians to crack the problem, in a series of five papers spanning almost 1,000 pages.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

The Tainted Legacy of an Iconic Health Care Giant: “No More Tears,” by Gardiner Harris, is a scathing expose of Johnson & Johnson

Gillian Neimark at Undark:

Near the beginning of “No More Tears: The Dark Secrets of Johnson & Johnson,” Gardiner Harris’s scathing exposé of the iconic pharmaceutical giant, he writes, “To me, my family, and everyone I knew, Johnson & Johnson was the ideal American corporation.” But in this forensic tour de force, he chronicles the many ways in which the health care behemoth repurposed science to protect profit — lying in sworn testimonials, massaging trial data, pouring billions into litigation, and sacrificing the lives and health of millions of Americans.

To understand the scale of that betrayal, Harris begins not with a drug, but with arguably the company’s most iconic product: Johnson’s Baby Powder. Introduced in 1894 and packaged in soft white and blue tones, the baby powder came to embody the purity, safety, and primal power of maternal care. The fragrance alone — engineered from more than 200 compounds — has imprinted itself onto olfactory memory.

As Harris explains, the company referred to the powder as its “crown jewel” and “Golden Egg.” Other companies had “rational” trust, a 1999 slide deck boasted, but “only Johnson & Johnson also has real emotional trust.”

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

How to Give a Good Toast

Matt Abrahams in Time Magazine:

Have you ever sat through a dull or inappropriate toast at a celebration, desperately wishing for it to end? You’re not alone. Bad toasts have a way of dragging down events, resulting in awkward silences, eye-rolling, and seat shifting. The problem with these subpar tributes is that they often make the audience uncomfortable, drag on and on, or focus too much on the speaker, rather than the individual or occasion being honored. Bad toasts can easily drain the energy from the room, detracting from the purpose of the celebration—to unite people in a moment of joy, respect, or reflection.

Ultimately, giving a good toast can be a powerful and fulfilling experience, transforming a potentially awkward obligation into a heartfelt tribute. The secrets to success lie in reframing your approach, embracing a structured format, and keeping your focus on those being celebrated. The next time you find yourself standing in front of a group, ready to deliver a tribute, remember: it’s not about you—it’s about honoring the special moments that connect us all. So lift your glass, embrace the moment, and let your words be a gift that resonates with everyone present. By doing so, you not only create a beautiful memory for the honoree but also enrich the experience for everyone involved.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Marlen Haushofer’s Parables Of Isolation

Janique Vigier at Bookforum:

IN 1946 THE AUSTRIAN WRITER Marlen Haushofer began publishing fairy tales and short stories in newspapers and small magazines. Her prewar writings—stories, poems, chapters of novels—had all been lost, and during the war she wrote “not a single line.” The new stories were a pragmatic measure: they were written to be published, to supplement the household budget. (Her husband, a provincial dentist, frittered the family’s finances away on flashy cars.) Yet since neither he nor her sons read her works, they could also be a form of revenge. “Professionally, I feed on anger,” she wrote to a friend in 1968, two years before her death. This stifled anger takes oblique forms. Philosophical novels, thrillers, dreams: her enervating allegories are like burrs—they stick.

Haushofer never achieved the international recognition of her radical postwar contemporaries—Thomas Bernhard, Ingeborg Bachmann, Elfriede Jelinek, Peter Handke. Slightly older, preternaturally unimposing, she rarely left the country, was only tepidly recognized in her time, and worked at the margins.

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Friday Poem

Viaticum

That all roads led to Rome, we know,
but what of all those bygone travelers,
the provisions and allowances
that saw them on their way — the litter
or the cart, the nuts and dates
and honeyed bread and wine,
coins to grease a palm or pay a toll?

And then the Eucharist for those near death,
as if the afterlife were also on a road
and prayers were grave goods for
their migrant souls.
So many crossroads and cross-purposes.
Imagine the gridlock
after earthquake, the fire and flood!

Now it’s all humdrum. No laden
hampers or talisman against the evil eye,
no provender ‘just in case’. There’s
a sign for food and toilets every 20 miles,
a Burger King, McDonald’s, fish and chips,
yet still I carry your photograph
and bear in mind your words
that sent me on my way –

Take care. I love you. Come back soon.
Call us when you can.

by Michael Jackson
from Dead Reckoning
Aukland University Press, 2006

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Monks in Jersey

Simon Wu at the Paris Review:

A coming-of-age ceremony, a Burmese bar mitzvah, a meditation retreat: I had called it all of those things to friends in the weeks before. It was a little bit of each but “more ceremonial slash familial than necessarily religious,” I’d qualified. We’d bargained with my mother for weeks to get out of it. We’re nearly thirty, my brother Nick reasoned. We’re adults. We didn’t want to shave our heads, wear monk’s robes, meditate all day. Maybe it is important to you, but we don’t care about religion, we said, armed with years of therapy.

We haggled it down from a week to a long weekend. My uncle Pawksa and my cousins would arrive from Boston late that night, and my mother was occupied trying to make sure they didn’t interact with my other uncle, Soe Aung, and his sons. Ten of us in total: me, my dad, my brothers Nick and Duke, my two uncles, my four cousins. One woman for whom the whole thing was actually for: my grandmother. My mother, one woman to hold the whole thing up.

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.