After AI

Cédric Durand in Sidecar:

The stock market valuation of AI-related firms has increased tenfold over the past decade. As John Lanchester noted recently, all but one of the world’s ten largest companies are connected to the future value of artificial intelligence. All but one of those are American, and together their value is equal to well over half of the US economy. Over the past few years, anticipation of the AI ‘revolution’ has driven a surge in investment in these US tech companies. Promises of a radical breakthrough in post-human intelligence and miraculous productivity gains have captured the animal spirits of investors to the point where, as the FT’s Ruchir Sharma put it, ‘America is now one big bet on AI’. Fixed investment in the sector is so enormous that it was the primary driver of US growth in 2025. The training and operation of AI models requires a huge physical build-up of data centres, computing equipment, cooling systems, network hardware, grid connections and power provision. Tech firms are expected to spend a staggering $5 trillion on this costly infrastructure – which is still mostly concentrated in the US – to meet expected demand between now and 2030.

The problem is that the numbers do not add up. To meet its colossal financial needs the sector has shifted from a model dominated by cash-flow and equity financing to debt financing. In principle, this turn to debt could simply reflect growing profit opportunities and the anticipation of forthcoming prosperity. Increasingly exotic financial deals suggest otherwise. A large part of the hype is fuelled by financial loops in which suppliers invest in their clients and vice versa. OpenAI is a case in point. Its leading chip provider, Nvidia – the most valuable company in the world – is planning to invest $100 billion in OpenAI, effectively funding demand for its own products. OpenAI, meanwhile, is spending almost twice what it earns on Microsoft’s cloud platform Azure, which provides the computing power to run its services, thereby enriching its main backer while accumulating debt.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Where a Hundred Analogies Bloom

Christian Sorace in The Ideas Letter:

Current political discourse is haunted by a specter—the specter of Maoism. When conventional politics starts to spin away from the mainstream and arouses the passions of the people, Mao often is invoked. Commentators routinely analogize Trump to him, calling the two men kindred spirits in “chaos” who “would have got on well.” The China expert Orville Schell has written that the Chairman “must be looking down from his Marxist-Leninist heaven with a smile.”

But would Mao really have celebrated anything beyond disorder for the US empire?

Such easy analogies are not only incorrect; worse, they damage our capacity for critical thinking and political action. Relying on them inhibits imagining a democratic politics beyond liberal democracy.

During periods of uncertainty, historical analogies can convey familiarity. But as they do, they distract from what is new in the present. Trump has been compared not only to Mao, but also to Hitler—as well as to contemporaries such as Xi Jinping, Vladimir Putin, and the dictators of so-called banana republics. As we travel in that time machine, one moment we are in the kinetic interwar years; in the next, we glaciate in a new Cold War. Analogies seem to reassure us that we have been there before. In fact, they only confuse any real sense of where we are now.

Portraits of bad men—master manipulators with a sociopathic disregard for the havoc they wreak on their nations, peoples, and economies—may be accurate characterizations, but they say little about sociopolitical dynamics, which are larger than any personality. They do not make up for proper political analysis. When a leader’s actions are presented out of context, their only imaginable purpose appears to be the consolidation of power—power without politics.

Yet historical analogies themselves are rhetorical devices; they too are tellers and makers of tales, and they create political claims. They implicitly ask us to see the world in a certain way—usually from the perspective of the status quo, from which alternative modes of politics are passed over or pathologized. To compare Trump to Mao and the US culture wars to the Cultural Revolution is to reduce entirely different political visions to reified personalities.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Matrices of Empire

Fernando Rugitsky in Phenomenal World:

After giving the order for Nicolás Maduro’s kidnapping, Donald Trump declared that the United States was now planning to ‘‘run’’ Venezuela. “It won’t cost us anything,” Trump said,

because the money coming out of the ground is very substantial . . . The oil companies are going to go in. They’re going to spend money. We’re going to take back the oil that, frankly, we should have taken back a long time ago. A lot of money is coming out of the ground.

In the past, when Washington claimed to act in the name of humanitarianism, democracy, or freedom, it was up to us—political economists—to reveal its ulterior motives, the material interests beneath the media spin. Now, as TJ Clark has written, political hypocrisy itself seems to be under threat. If imperial resource-grabbing is openly acknowledged, what is left for us to analyze?

Over the last week, much of the debate on the US attack has questioned whether oil is really the determinant factor. Some argue that Venezuela’s heavy crude is too expensive to extract, and that—given the current state of the market and the unlikelihood of price increases in the near future—this would be an irrational investment for US corporations. Others, meanwhile, note that about half of Venezuela’s oil reserves are not of the heavy kind found in the Orinoco Belt, and claim that in oil fields in the Maracaibo and Monagas basins there is still the potential for “quick wins” for big oil companies and oil-service firms.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

How can we defend ourselves from the new plague of ‘human fracking’?

From The Guardian:

In the last 15 years, a linked series of unprecedented technologies have changed the experience of personhood across most of the world. It is estimated that nearly 70% of the human population of the Earth currently possesses a smartphone, and these devices constitute about 95% of internet access-points on the planet. Globally, on average, people seem to spend close to half their waking hours looking at screens, and among young people in the rich world the number is a good deal higher than that.

History teaches that new technologies always make possible new forms of exploitation, and this basic fact has been spectacularly exemplified by the rise of society-scale digital platforms. It has been driven by a remarkable new way of extracting money from human beings: call it “human fracking”. Just as petroleum frackers pump high-pressure, high-volume detergents into the ground to force a little monetisable black gold to the surface, human frackers pump high-pressure, high-volume detergent into our faces (in the form of endless streams of addictive slop and maximally disruptive user-generated content), to force a slurry of human attention to the surface, where they can collect it, and take it to market.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

In First Human Trial, Zombie Cancer Cells Train the Body to Fight Tumors

Shelly Fan in Singularity Hub:

Lights, vitamin, action. A combination of vitamin B2 and ultraviolet light hardly sounds like a next-generation cancer treatment. But a small new trial is testing the duo in people with recurrent ovarian cancer. Led by PhotonPharma, this first-in-humans study builds on decades of work investigating whether we can turn whole cancer cells into “vaccines.” Isolated from cancer patients, the cells are stripped of the ability to multiply but keep all other protein signals intact. Once reinfused, the cells can, in theory, alert the immune system that something is awry.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Sunday Poem

Autumn in Portage

You told me autumn in Michigan is revealing
hidden behind yards of transgeographic distance
watching out leaves muddled on pavements like
last season’s motifs jotted in a diary kept away from
others, you must have touched your hair lingering
around lobes, those cracked lips wanting more than
this feast of yellow and russet, the Red oak spilling
wine and the Aspen grieving over getting yellowed
birches standing like seasoned saints absorbing frosting
egos, this witchcraft of visuals, out of the car’s window
made the most of the sight, clicking images for a foreign
hand to touch your autumn, not you wrapped in warmers.

by Rizwan Akhtar

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Friday, January 16, 2026

The Case for Financial Crime Bounty Hunters

Miles Kellerman at False Positive:

It was just the type of document I was hoping to find.

Buried beneath endless layers of digital files, each poorly labelled and filled with unsearchable PDFs, was an organizational structure chart. The presence of this chart was not, in itself, surprising. It is one of the many documents financial institutions are required to collect when performing due diligence on new customers. What made this chart notable was who it named as the company’s owner. Namely: an individual with alleged ties to a ruthless terrorist group.1

I was not reviewing these files as a regulator. Nor was I a journalist chasing down some lead. Rather, I was supporting a corporate monitorship, an obscure but highly consequential tool of criminal enforcement. Monitorships arise when prosecutors determine that a company has broken the law at scale. Perhaps a bank has been failing to perform due diligence for years, allowing North Korean agents to launder stolen funds through riverboat casinos. Or maybe it’s a mining conglomerate bribing officials across central Africa. You know, that kind of thing.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Discarding the Shaft-and-Belt Model of Software Development

Steve Newman at Second Thoughts:

It’s often been observed that taking full advantage of AI will require changing work practices, just as taking full advantage of electric motors in manufacturing required changing the way factories were laid out. But what will those changes look like? Early answers are starting to emerge, coming (unsurprisingly) from the field of software development. Interestingly, the biggest impacts may not be cost savings!

My timeline is suddenly awash in engineers (including me!) reporting that Claude Code is revolutionizing their work. I can see the outlines of a new approach to software development, suited for the AI age. The implications may apply to other fields as well. The key ideas…

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Every Indian train is a moving referendum on the republic

Digvijay Nikam in Frontline:

S.N.S. Sastry’s 1967 documentary film I Am 20 opens with the whistle of a train and the words of T. N. Subramanian, a loquacious young man with a book of chemistry in front. In a nearly 20-minute film documenting the reflections, hopes, and fears of 20-year-old Indians regarding the equally old Indian republic, Subramanian begins with confessing his ambition, much like Mohandas Gandhi who had returned from South Africa, to “go through this country top to bottom” with “a pad and paper, a tape recorder, and a camera… seeing all kinds of people… their anguish and their anger, the fertile soil, the pastures, everything! So that one day when I could come back, I could open the book and remind myself of what I am part of and what is part of me.”

While Gandhi’s journey went on to transform the history of this country, whether Subramanian’s came to fruition is a mystery. But it at least became the inspiration for Amitava Kumar’s latest book The Social Life of Indian Trains: A Journey. In August 2024, Kumar found himself aboard the Himsagar Express with a pad and paper.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

On The Art Of Kerry James Marshall

James Meyer at Artforum:

The artist’s astounding success was by no means predictable when he started out. History painting, the highest of the classical painterly genres as defined by the Royal Academy’s founders, was a distant memory by the 1980s, when the revival of figurative painting and tired Expressionist formulas on both sides of the Atlantic inspired the passionate critiques of Benjamin H. D. Buchloh and his October compatriots. In his well-argued catalogue essay, Godfrey reckons with his own earlier skepticism of figuration, including Marshall’s. As he describes, a visit to the painter’s Chicago studio in 2012 instigated a process of internal interrogation. He came to believe that history painting—if refreshed by new techniques—would speak more directly to audiences, including viewers not typically drawn to museums, than the conceptualist formulas of a prior generation, embracing a position he ascribes to Marshall himself: “As [Marshall] knew, figurative paintings in museums attracted a large audience of experts, first-timers, tourists and schoolchildren, far broader than the niche audience for the lens- and text-based artworks I revered then.” The crowds of teenagers and children listening raptly to the lectures of identical-looking docents in the back-to-back galleries in Untitled (Underpainting), 2018, imagine an art world infinitely more inclusive than the one Marshall entered as a young artist.

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

The California Lineage Of Black Sparrow Press

Joshua Bodwell at the LARB:

JOHN MARTIN NEVER smoked cigarettes. He did not use drugs or drink alcohol. Martin’s vice was book collecting, which he began in earnest in the late 1930s after he dropped out of UCLA. His enrollment was brief: he left when he discovered that his favorite modern authors, such as Ezra Pound, D. H. Lawrence, and Wallace Stevens, were not on the curriculum.

Over the next decade and a half, Martin built a ranging collection of several thousand books—predominantly first editions of British and American fiction and drama, as well as contemporary poetry. In this massive collection, there was not, Martin said, “a single book that I would take out and say ‘No, this isn’t good.’ I had everybody from Henry James to Allen Ginsberg.” He collected pre–World War II books and postmodern literature with equal interest. Work by William Faulkner and Sherwood Anderson sat on his shelves alongside a complete run of all 13 issues of poet Ed Sanders’s short-lived and scarce 1960s mimeographed zine Fuck You/ A Magazine of the Arts. Through his friendship with Henry Miller, begun in the 1950s, Martin gathered a unique assortment of the author’s work. Most impressive of all was Martin’s D. H. Lawrence collection, which he believed was one of the finest in private hands. It included not only first editions and special editions but also original manuscripts and paintings by the author.

more here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Friday Poem

The World is a Beautiful Place

The world is a beautiful place
to be born into
if you don’t mind happiness
not always being
so very much fun

if you don’t mind a touch of hell
now and then
just when everything is fine
because even in heaven
they don’t sing
all the time

The world is a beautiful place
to be born into
if you don’t mind some people dying
all the time
or maybe only starving
some of the time
which isn’t half so bad
if it isn’t you

Oh the world is a beautiful place
to be born into
if you don’t much mind
a few dead minds
in the higher places
or a bomb or two
now and then
in your upturned faces
or such other improprieties
as our Name Brand society
is prey to

with its men of distinction
and its men of extinction
and its priests
and other patrolmen
and its various segregations
and congressional investigations
and other constipations
that our fool flesh
is heir to

Yes the world is the best place of all
for a lot of such things as
making the fun scene
and making the love scene
and making the sad scene
and singing low songs of having
inspirations

and walking around
looking at everything
and smelling flowers
and goosing statues
and even thinking
and kissing people and
making babies and wearing pants
and waving hats and
dancing

and going swimming in rivers
on picnics
in the middle of the summer
and just generally
‘living it up’

Yes
but then right in the middle of it
comes the smiling
mortician

by Lawrence Ferlinghetti
from
A Coney Island of the Mind
New Directions Publishing 

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

A ‘time capsule for cells’ stores the secret experiences of their past

Ewen Callaway in Nature:

Cells change constantly. Researchers tend to study their dynamics in two ways. One method is to watch them live under a microscope, where a limited number of types of molecules can be tracked for days with fluorescent tags. Another way is in test tubes at a single time point, usually the end of an experiment, where mRNA molecules can be measured and compared with those in other cells to reconstruct the past. Over the last decade, researchers have developed a bevy of ‘cell recorders’ — many using CRISPR gene editing — to create an indelible genetic ledger of transient events, such as the activity of a particular molecular pathway over time. This ledger can then be read by genome sequencing to identify the edits at a later point, creating a timeline of cellular events.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

This Is How Your Mind Works

David Brooks in The New York Times:

Who are you? What’s going on deep inside yourself? How do you understand your own mind? The ancient sages had big debates about this, and now modern neuroscience is helping us sort it all out. When my amateur fascination with neuroscience began, roughly two decades ago, the scientists seemed to spend a lot of time trying to figure out where in the brain different functions were happening. That led to a lot of simplistic shorthand in the popular conversation: Emotion is in the amygdala. Motivation is in the nucleus accumbens. Back in those days management consultants could make a good living by giving presentations with slides of brain scans while uttering sentences like: “You can see that the parietal lobe is all lit up. This proves that …”

But over the past several years the field of neuroscience seems to have moved away from this modular approach (each brain region has its own job). Researchers are more likely to believe that the brain is a network of interconnected regions. They are more likely to talk about vast and dynamic webs of neurons whose connections link disparate parts of the brain.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.

Thursday, January 15, 2026

On Life, Death, and Birding

Farah Naz Rishi at Literary Hub:

A few days after my brother died, I sat in the living room of a dead house and made eye contact with a bird.

It’d been raining that day: the world outside had been coated in a wet, pewter varnish, muted and hollow. My mother and I sat on the couch in a stunned stillness, each cradling a mug of chamomile tea we weren’t really drinking. Everyone who’d come to the funeral had left the night before. Now it was just us, trying to make sense of the quiet.

We were mid-sentence—trivial talk, the kind you resort to when anything real feels too sharp to touch—when a red-tailed hawk cut through the gray and landed on our deck railing. Five feet from us. Close enough that we could see the rain slicking its feathers, the slow expansion of its rib cage as it breathed.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.