The Manosphere in the Middle

by David Kordahl

A mid-century car ad.

After the first Cub Scouts meeting of the new year, I stood outside the Scout hut chatting with two other dads, both of them doctors. I am also called “doctor” at work, mostly by premed students who are enrolled in their required physics course, but it’s not the same—for many reasons, but only one that I think about.

It was dark outside, and chilly. Shreveport had experienced a week of snow, during which our unprepared city had shut down. We discussed what each of our families had done during the pause. Two of us had stayed home, venturing out only to sled, but the other doctor revealed that he had missed the entire ordeal.

He had been on vacation in Madagascar, after a short stop in Paris. He took out his iPhone and showed us how he and his wife, the surgeon, had posed with the tigers lounging harmlessly on the grounds of their resort.

First, a disclaimer. As a newly tenured professor at a small college, I do fine, but I’m not wealthy. My family’s winter trip had me, my wife, and our three children trekking up to Minnesota in a Toyota minivan. My household income is right around the American median, which makes me something like a global five-percenter. In objective terms, it’s unreasonable to complain about this.

But the doctor’s pictures got me thinking. When I was myself a college student, my mom, like many parents, had hoped for her son to become the right kind of doctor. I steadily refused. I sneered at the premeds, whose intellectual attitudes seemed to me boringly pragmatic. They were the dull drones, focusing on rote memorization and grade-grubbing, while I, dear reader—I was an intellectual.

Of course, one part of “being an intellectual” (and, of course, I would have never put it that way, back when I thought I really had a shot at it) is not to care too much about creature comforts. Consider Paul Erdős, proving theorems out of his suitcase, or Simone Weil, laboring in a factory to understand the working class. A certain level of self-abnegation should be tolerated for a decade or two.

Yet now, as I approach midlife (forty in October), I find myself having built no great theory, having written no great book. I am a respectable member of the local establishment, a reliable component of the academic infrastructure.

And I have to ask: what the fuck am I doing here? Read more »

Sunday, July 27, 2025

A Warmer View of The Disturbed Paternal Grandparents I Never Knew—The Memoir Continues

by Barbara Fischkin

Brownsville, Brooklyn, New York, 1930’s. “Pushcart Market,” similar to one frequented by the shared paternal grandmother of Barbara Fischkin and her Cousin Bernie.  Source:  Library of Congress. Photographer: Alan Fisher.

Cousin Bernie’s Own Memoir Surfaces Years After His Death

(a.k.a Cousin Bernie, Free-Range Professor-Part Three)

As much as I loved my late Cousin Bernie, I figured that in regard to my own memoir, I was done with him. Cousins are great but those two earlier chapters—on just one cousin—were more than enough.

Then… I heard from Bernie.

A heavenly nudge.

Years after his death, I believed I could identify his voice with its gravelly Brooklyn twang, slightly tempered by a slower drawl acquired during decades in the Midwest.

“There is a lot more to write about me. And if it is about me, then it is also about you.”

I wish I could report that this actually came from the afterlife.

Nope.

It came from the post office.

Joan Hamilton Morris, Cousin Bernie’s widow, mailed his unpublished memoir to me, after she found it while moving to a new assisted living residence. That was about a month ago. I never knew it existed. Now, I had it in hand—Cousin Bernie’s memoir, written quietly in an adult education class he took after retiring as an honored professor of Psychology and Mathematics at a public university in Indianapolis, Indiana.

I flipped through the typewritten, hard copy pages, stopping early at a description of my Grandpa Phillip. He had died before I was born and all I knew about him, from my parents, was that he had been a handsome, drunken, sporadically employed, womanizer who beat his sons and his long-suffering wife, Grandma Toby. Nice. Grandma Toby died young. Grandpa Phillip subsequently romanced a new bevy of women and then, sort of made up for past sins by marrying one of them.

Despite being decades apart in age, Bernie was my first cousin. This explains why we had the same paternal grandparents. Except, unlike me, he had known them. And so, thanks to Cousin Bernie, I read about a different version of Grandpa Phillip. And learned more about Grandma Toby, too. Read more »

Monday, May 22, 2023

Parenthood, Conservatism, and the Existing World

by David Kordahl

Portrait of the Family Hinlopen (Gabriël Metsu, c. 1663)

I’m writing this column in the cool semi-darkness of a municipal auditorium. I will be here for several hours, and my main duty is to stay put. This is the dress rehearsal for a dance recital where my daughters (ages four and six) will perform. When the time comes, I will take a video with my phone.

There is nothing especially noteworthy about this, as I am just one among the dozens of parents in this room, and the millions of Americans elsewhere, who regularly schlep their children from activity to activity. Recently, however, I came across a journal article claiming that these hours spent taking care of children may have political consequences reaching far beyond the cost of dance lessons. “Experimental and cross-cultural evidence that parenthood and parental care increase social conservatism,” a psychology study from 2022 by the international collaboration of Kerry et al., argues that, across the globe, parenthood makes people more conservative.

Specifically, the article claims that parents, on average, have more conservative attitudes than their non-parents on questions involving promiscuity, homosexuality, prostitution, and abortion. Moreover, the article suggests that this relationship may be causal, that parenthood might induce people to adopt conservative attitudes (though only on social issues—not on economics). Read more »