Tag: Daniel Gauss

Praying through Asia

Posted on by Daniel Gauss

by Daniel Gauss

The guillotine at Hoa Lo Prison in Hanoi. All photos taken by Daniel Gauss.

When I went to Hanoi for the first time, I began a travel ritual I now follow in every city I visit.

I had grown up reading about the Vietnam War, mostly from our perspective, but still grim and unflinching, full of failed policy and the atrocities our military carried out. It was not just the insane level of the violence but its cruel senselessness that affected me, that so much suffering and death had been meted out gratuitously and malevolently by military and political leaders who knew we could not win. We kept killing innocent people and sacrificing our own troops, long after it was clear we should have stopped.

Because it was my country that inflicted the egregious pain and my own compatriots who were harmed by the war, it unsettled me deeply and tore apart the benevolent image of my country I had been taught. I knew that going to Hanoi would be more emotional than any trip I had taken before.

I felt I couldn’t just show up in Hanoi, I needed to go somewhere meaningful on my first day and offer a type of silent prayer. I now find a meaningful place in every city I visit to offer a prayer for those who have suffered. Read more »

Thursday, May 22, 2025

Talking to Machines, Learning to Be Human: AI as a Moral Feedback Loop

Posted on by Daniel Gauss

by Daniel Gauss

Remember how Dave interacted with HAL 9000 in 2001: A Space Odyssey? Equanimity and calm politeness, echoing HAL’s own measured tone. It’s tempting to wonder whether Arthur C. Clarke and Stanley Kubrick were implying that prolonged interaction with an AI system influenced Dave’s communication style and even, perhaps, his overall demeanor. Even when Dave is pulling HAL’s circuits, after the entire crew has been murdered by HAL, he does so with relative aplomb.

Whether or not we believe HAL is truly conscious, or simply a masterful simulation of consciousness, the interaction still seems to have influenced Dave. The Dave and HAL dynamic can, thus, prompt us to ask: What can our behavior toward AI reveal about us? Could interacting with AI, strange as it sounds, actually help us become more patient, more deliberate, even more ethical in our dealings with others?

So let’s say an AI user, frustrated, calls the chatbot stupid, useless, and a piece of junk, and the AI does not retaliate. It doesn’t reflect the hostility back. There is, after all, not a drop of cortisol in the machine. Instead, it responds calmly: ‘I can tell you’re frustrated. Let’s please keep things constructive so I can help you.’ No venom, no sarcasm, no escalation, only moral purpose and poise.

By not returning insult with insult, AI chatbots model an ideal that many people struggle to, or cannot, uphold: patience, dignity, and emotional regulation in the face of perceived provocation. This refusal to retaliate is often rejected as a value by many, who surrender to their lesser neurochemicals without resistance and mindlessly strike back. Not striking back, by the AI unit, becomes a strong counter-value to our quite common negative behavior.

So AI may not just serve us, it may teach us, gently checking negative behavior and affirming respectful behavior. Through repeated interaction, we might begin to internalize these norms ourselves, or at least recognize that we have the capacity to act in a more pro-social manner, rather than simply reacting according to our conditioning and neurochemical impulses. Read more »