On a new history of pedantry

Hannah Katznelson at The Hedgehog Review:

At the beginning of On the Nature of Things, a sort of textbook of Epicurean philosophy, the Roman poet Lucretius explains his choice to write in verse by comparing his poem to a cup of bitter medicine whose rim has been smeared with honey. Just as young patients will heal quicker if they enjoy taking their medicine, young students will benefit from encountering Epicurus’s difficult but edifying doctrine in a form they find pleasurable, even if that pleasure is only “lip-deep.” Arnoud S.Q. Visser’s On Pedantry: A Cultural History of the Know-It-All, a book about how intellectuals ranging from Socrates to Dr. Strangelove have made themselves disliked, takes a similar view of intellectual effort and enjoyment. The book is full of useful considerations for pedants hoping to be less irritating, but Visser ultimately considers that irritation the cost of doing business: Worthwhile intellectual work is unavoidably challenging, and sometimes even unpleasant.

Visser, an intellectual historian and scholar of Renaissance humanism at Utrecht University who has been as prolific writing for popular audiences as for academic ones, does a wonderful job of candy-coating this bitter pill. On Pedantry is relaxed and inviting; it is economical but judicious with historical detail, and discreet in its erudition.

More here.

Enjoying the content on 3QD? Help keep us going by donating now.